| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

khosta
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 11:23:00 -
[1]
Right now i suspect that the staff in charge of balance changes dont play the game and/or have little knowledge of the game mechanics.
I suspect im not the only one with such doubts.
So please help restore our confidence that the current balancing team is working for the best interests of the game.
My challenge is for the balancing team to explain how they expect the proposed webifier nerf will affect blaster ships.
Thats all! Very easy. As things stand, I have the impression that the current balancing team is not even aware of the fact that a webifier is a necessary module to allow blasters to hit their intended targets.
Please prove me/us wrong.
|

Kano Sekor
Amarr The Movement
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 11:26:00 -
[2]
They dont have to play the game they can just introduce the changes on Sisi and wait for feedback, since ppl actually pay to play the game. And blaster pilots can still be up your arse imo even with the webber change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Desu Sigs |

Cpt Branko
Surge. NIght's Dawn
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 11:28:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 28/07/2008 11:28:19
Originally by: khosta
My challenge is for the balancing team to explain how they expect the proposed webifier nerf will affect blaster ships.
They won't be able to insta-**** anything smaller then them?
Doesn't it go precisely with the bigger != better mantra?
They'll still murder BS just fine.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

Todd Doughnut
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 11:33:00 -
[4]
put 2 webs on. Or a module to increase sig radius. Or a tracker. Or put a web drone on them.
|

Mr Sneaky
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 11:36:00 -
[5]
IMO its a nerf gallente and minmatar thing, as caldrai and amarr are getten eated in FW 
|

khosta
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 11:43:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Cpt Branko
They won't be able to insta-**** anything smaller then them?
If CCP believed blaster BS to be overpowered and needed a nerf, thats fine. I just want them to clarify that they intended to nerf them.
Since there was no mention of blaster BS being overpowered, it gives the impression they completely overlooked the issue.
I thought the intended changes were to eliminate 'ludicrous speeds', not to nerf blaster BS which dont go anywhere near this speed.
I repeat (for the flamers), if CCP feel blaster ships need a nerf, then TELL US. This nerfing without apparent reason just looks like incompetence to me.
|

Cpt Branko
Surge. NIght's Dawn
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 11:48:00 -
[7]
Originally by: khosta
Originally by: Cpt Branko
They won't be able to insta-**** anything smaller then them?
If CCP believed blaster BS to be overpowered and needed a nerf, thats fine. I just want them to clarify that they intended to nerf them.
Since there was no mention of blaster BS being overpowered, it gives the impression they completely overlooked the issue.
I thought the intended changes were to eliminate 'ludicrous speeds', not to nerf blaster BS which dont go anywhere near this speed.
I repeat (for the flamers), if CCP feel blaster ships need a nerf, then TELL US. This nerfing without apparent reason just looks like incompetence to me.
If they nerfed nanoing but did nothing, it'd be a obvious boost of turret BS, as they'd just have a easier time killing preety much everything, and BS are too good at ganking everything from frigates to other BS at the moment, imo. The situation certainly doesn't promote mixed gangs, unless you're expecting a nano-gang. With nano-gangs removed, and no changes done, wouldn't battleship groups be simply unbalanced in their ability to fight *everything*?
They DID say they want to leave guerilla warfare possible. If you look at the web+scram+AB changes, you'll notice that it is a big boost to small ships attacking bigger ones (which was preety broken when attacking turret ships before). You'll now be able to conduct guerilla warfare in smaller ships.
Furthermore, CCP has always stated that bigger!=automagically better, so now they're finally actually doing something about it. It's good.
And it won't affect turret BS fights much anyway.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |