EVE Search - CCP Awarded

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

CCP Awarded

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Rexthor Hammerfists The Movement	Posted - 2008.07.29 13:14:00 - [1] This one is for you ccp, and the ppl behind of one of the greatest and bravest emergency-brake-change since the Great Ol`Nerf of warp core stabs. Your Intentions to bring more diversity where cookiecutter setups have been only makes you more worthy of getting the BallZ of Steel. Now go ahead and change carriers into combat=!hauling as you were suggesting and cut the ecms range by 2/3 and were all set, no brownnosing without motives eh :) - Any good reason for gateguns shooting drones and thus removing dronebased ships from pirating?
Rexthor Hammerfists The Movement	Posted - 2008.07.29 13:14:00 - [2] This one is for you ccp, and the ppl behind of one of the greatest and bravest emergency-brake-change since the Great Ol`Nerf of warp core stabs. Your Intentions to bring more diversity where cookiecutter setups have been only makes you more worthy of getting the BallZ of Steel. Now go ahead and change carriers into combat=!hauling as you were suggesting and cut the ecms range by 2/3 and were all set, no brownnosing without motives eh :) - Any good reason for gateguns shooting drones and thus removing dronebased ships from pirating?
Aneu Angellus Caldari Revival.	Posted - 2008.07.29 13:16:00 - [3] Absolutley signed! ♥ ________________ REVIVAL
Aneu Angellus Caldari Revival.	Posted - 2008.07.29 13:16:00 - [4] Absolutley signed! ♥ ________________ REVIVAL
Theo Samaritan Gallente Eve-Academy	Posted - 2008.07.29 13:18:00 - [5] Originally by: Rexthor Hammerfists This one is for you ccp, and the ppl behind of one of the greatest and bravest emergency-brake-change since the Great Ol`Nerf of warp core stabs. Your Intentions to bring more diversity where cookiecutter setups have been only makes you more worthy of getting the BallZ of Steel. Now go ahead and change carriers into combat=!hauling as you were suggesting and cut the ecms range by 2/3 and were all set, no brownnosing without motives eh :) +1up ________________________ Lord WarATron: "To do the Abaddon Hadoken, you need to do the following manover with the joypad. ↓ .... ↓→ .... → + ●
Sir Substance Minmatar Sunspot Requisitions Worlds End Consortium	Posted - 2008.07.29 13:18:00 - [6] hardly that. the vocal majority on the forums has been begging. its more giving in then hardening up. although, last time i checked it was 600 against 200 for in the vote in assembly hall. - PvPers always say "GB2WoW". the message is that EVE is hard, and people just need to deal with it. wasn't it funny how when nano's started making it hard for them, that all went out the window?
Theo Samaritan Gallente Eve-Academy	Posted - 2008.07.29 13:18:00 - [7] Originally by: Rexthor Hammerfists This one is for you ccp, and the ppl behind of one of the greatest and bravest emergency-brake-change since the Great Ol`Nerf of warp core stabs. Your Intentions to bring more diversity where cookiecutter setups have been only makes you more worthy of getting the BallZ of Steel. Now go ahead and change carriers into combat=!hauling as you were suggesting and cut the ecms range by 2/3 and were all set, no brownnosing without motives eh :) +1up ________________________ Lord WarATron: "To do the Abaddon Hadoken, you need to do the following manover with the joypad. ↓ .... ↓→ .... → + ●
Sir Substance Minmatar Sunspot Requisitions Worlds End Consortium	Posted - 2008.07.29 13:18:00 - [8] hardly that. the vocal majority on the forums has been begging. its more giving in then hardening up. although, last time i checked it was 600 against 200 for in the vote in assembly hall. - PvPers always say "GB2WoW". the message is that EVE is hard, and people just need to deal with it. wasn't it funny how when nano's started making it hard for them, that all went out the window?
Winterblink Body Count Inc. The Requiem	Posted - 2008.07.29 13:20:00 - [9] Balls of Steel was a great game. Was a pinball game for those who don't know, and that's its logo. warp drive active \| nature vraie
Winterblink Body Count Inc. The Requiem	Posted - 2008.07.29 13:20:00 - [10] Balls of Steel was a great game. Was a pinball game for those who don't know, and that's its logo. warp drive active \| nature vraie
Lui Kai Perkone	Posted - 2008.07.29 13:23:00 - [11] Originally by: Sir Substance PvPers always say "GB2WoW". the message is that EVE is hard, and people just need to deal with it. wasn't it funny how when nano's started making it hard for them, that all wend out the window? In point of fact, nanos didn't affect anyone but PVPers, so "hard for who?" is a bit of a question here. But the real failing here is that nanos didn't make it harder for anyone. They just gave players who used it the ability to disengage at will. Which, in my book, is a checkmark in the "easier" column. ---------------- Ambulation Answers
Kelron Queldine Beyond Divinity Inc	Posted - 2008.07.29 13:23:00 - [12] I assume this is your sig as it didn't show when I hit quote, but it's still relevant. Originally by: Sir Substance PvPers always say to carebears "GB2WoW". clearly the message is that EVE is hard, and that carebears just need to deal with it. wasn't it funny how when nano's started making it hard for them, tha The fact that you're making a distinction between "PvPers" and "nanos" says something, doesn't it? I know how to kill nanoships, but these changes are needed and well done to CCP for introducing them. Not only is the use of speed tanking on non-specialised ships going to be greatly reduced, it's also going to be a nice boost to small ships and afterburners.
Lui Kai Perkone	Posted - 2008.07.29 13:23:00 - [13] Originally by: Sir Substance PvPers always say "GB2WoW". the message is that EVE is hard, and people just need to deal with it. wasn't it funny how when nano's started making it hard for them, that all wend out the window? In point of fact, nanos didn't affect anyone but PVPers, so "hard for who?" is a bit of a question here. But the real failing here is that nanos didn't make it harder for anyone. They just gave players who used it the ability to disengage at will. Which, in my book, is a checkmark in the "easier" column. ---------------- Ambulation Answers
Kelron Queldine Beyond Divinity Inc	Posted - 2008.07.29 13:23:00 - [14] I assume this is your sig as it didn't show when I hit quote, but it's still relevant. Originally by: Sir Substance PvPers always say to carebears "GB2WoW". clearly the message is that EVE is hard, and that carebears just need to deal with it. wasn't it funny how when nano's started making it hard for them, tha The fact that you're making a distinction between "PvPers" and "nanos" says something, doesn't it? I know how to kill nanoships, but these changes are needed and well done to CCP for introducing them. Not only is the use of speed tanking on non-specialised ships going to be greatly reduced, it's also going to be a nice boost to small ships and afterburners.
BostonGeorge	Posted - 2008.07.29 14:28:00 - [15] Originally by: Sir Substance hardly that. the vocal majority on the forums has been begging. its more giving in then hardening up. although, last time i checked it was 600 against 200 for in the vote in assembly hall. I vote where now?
Call'Da Poleece Minmatar	Posted - 2008.07.29 14:32:00 - [16] Originally by: BostonGeorge Originally by: Sir Substance hardly that. the vocal majority on the forums has been begging. its more giving in then hardening up. although, last time i checked it was 600 against 200 for in the vote in assembly hall. I vote where now? Where all the nano pilots and all their alts have been begging for the last couple of days
Slanty McGarglefist	Posted - 2008.07.29 14:48:00 - [17] __________________________________________________ Originally by: CCP Wrangler No Doh!
GallenteCitizen20080615 Gallente Federation War News	Posted - 2008.07.29 14:52:00 - [18] i dont mind if it goes through or not i dont speed tank my ship, i learned that this might be comming along time now i have made sure that my setup isnt nano i can kill nano's it much better when you ransom there pods as they have snakes in Originally by: CCP Wrangler We are pleased to aim! Or was that the other way around?

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.