|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Packtu'sa
Nabaal Construction and Industrials Corp
   |
Posted - 2008.08.06 19:50:00 -
[1]
I think this will hurt fund managers in the long run, because it will reduce the effective return they are able to offer and it puts them under additional pressure to meet even more investor demands. If we had a plethora of viable offerings with some scams mixed in, this would work, but as it is we've too few public offerings to work with.
Packtu'sa [NCIC]
Founder/CEO, Nabaal Construction and Industrials Corp |
Packtu'sa
Nabaal Construction and Industrials Corp
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 20:37:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Mr Horizontal
@Packtu'sa
Actually, this would enable more funds to float easier and safer, so it'd create more competition. What'd hurt managers is that they'd have to adapt to deal with competition potentially in the same business they're in themselves.
Funds would float easier for the offerings that get posted, yes, but will more viable offerings be posted? As it is, any offering even close to viable gets funding anyway. Why would this lead to more funds invested? It helps the investor and harms the fund manager, and therefore the present problem we havełtoo much money looking for investment opportunities and too few offeringsłwill only be made worse.
Packtu'sa [NCIC]
Founder/CEO, Nabaal Construction and Industrials Corp |
Packtu'sa
Nabaal Construction and Industrials Corp
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 21:26:00 -
[3]
Originally by: YouGotRipped
We definitely need more lemmings here.
Could you not?
Packtu'sa [NCIC]
Founder/CEO, Nabaal Construction and Industrials Corp |
Packtu'sa
Nabaal Construction and Industrials Corp
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 23:40:00 -
[4]
This could maybe work for investors as insurance, but not as a policy for fund managers. If 18% is true, you might see investors willing to chalk up a 25% premium; on the other hand, you'll see more reckless investing as a result.
I don't see a way until the available offerings begin to match the available funds.
Packtu'sa [NCIC]
Founder/CEO, Nabaal Construction and Industrials Corp |
Packtu'sa
Nabaal Construction and Industrials Corp
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 06:37:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Khrillian
A lot of IPOs went to 0 value. ISSO for example had several stations, each which cost 50bil that all became 0. That's quite a bit of money compared to most IPOs today.
ISS also offered an exchange where investors in the outpost funds could trade in their shares for their equivalent value in ISSO shares. Remember that those six public outposts were three individual IPOs based on region, and then the ISSO IPO (500bn) was launched shortly before the public outposts were lost.
Packtu'sa [NCIC]
Founder/CEO, Nabaal Construction and Industrials Corp |
|
|
| |
|