EVE Search - /me tries to FLAG DOWN A DEV/GM

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

/me tries to FLAG DOWN A DEV/GM

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Celestial Divinity B'haxed Productions	Posted - 2008.09.03 19:49:00 - [1] Me and someone else decided to have a 1 vs 1 in amarr via me dropping a can. The guy ws a bit new so didn't know game mechanics well. He grabbed the can and started shooting me before I could lock him :P His Punisher got concorded and we all had a good laugh. I quickly stopped laughing when I saw the logs. 19:42:46 Notify Largo d'Alba, Criminals are not welcome here. Leave now or be destroyed. 19:42:59 Combat Largo d'Alba aims well at you, inflicting 28.3 damage. It took over 13 seconds for concord to respond in a 1.0 system?
Celestial Divinity B'haxed Productions	Posted - 2008.09.03 19:49:00 - [2] Me and someone else decided to have a 1 vs 1 in amarr via me dropping a can. The guy ws a bit new so didn't know game mechanics well. He grabbed the can and started shooting me before I could lock him :P His Punisher got concorded and we all had a good laugh. I quickly stopped laughing when I saw the logs. 19:42:46 Notify Largo d'Alba, Criminals are not welcome here. Leave now or be destroyed. 19:42:59 Combat Largo d'Alba aims well at you, inflicting 28.3 damage. It took over 13 seconds for concord to respond in a 1.0 system?
Matalino Gallente Ki Tech Industries	Posted - 2008.09.03 19:53:00 - [3] Originally by: Celestial Divinity It took over 13 seconds for concord to respond in a 1.0 system? Cool! I guess that "CONCORD response times for aggressing a neutral player in High Security space have also been significantly reduced." means that they have been delayed by 30%. Last time I tested on Sisi it was 10 seconds in a true 1.0 security system. Or perhaps that was an earlier revision of these changes as I am not sure exactly which point during those revisions that I did my test.
Matalino Gallente Ki Tech Industries	Posted - 2008.09.03 19:53:00 - [4] Originally by: Celestial Divinity It took over 13 seconds for concord to respond in a 1.0 system? Cool! I guess that "CONCORD response times for aggressing a neutral player in High Security space have also been significantly reduced." means that they have been delayed by 30%. Last time I tested on Sisi it was 10 seconds in a true 1.0 security system. Or perhaps that was an earlier revision of these changes as I am not sure exactly which point during those revisions that I did my test.
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force	Posted - 2008.09.03 19:55:00 - [5] Edited by: Akita T on 03/09/2008 19:56:20 Sounds about right. What's the problem, do you honestly expect them to show up instantly ? P.S. @Matalino : I always assumed they meant "significantly reduced in lower highsec" _ SHOPS \|\| Mission rewards revamp \|\| better nanofix
Celestial Divinity B'haxed Productions	Posted - 2008.09.03 19:55:00 - [6] We all assumed reduced means less time not more :P SO now Suicide gankers can launch a good 2-3 Volleys at haulers instead of just 1
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force	Posted - 2008.09.03 19:55:00 - [7] Edited by: Akita T on 03/09/2008 19:56:20 Sounds about right. What's the problem, do you honestly expect them to show up instantly ? P.S. @Matalino : I always assumed they meant "significantly reduced in lower highsec" _ SHOPS \|\| Mission rewards revamp \|\| better nanofix
Celestial Divinity B'haxed Productions	Posted - 2008.09.03 19:55:00 - [8] We all assumed reduced means less time not more :P SO now Suicide gankers can launch a good 2-3 Volleys at haulers instead of just 1
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force	Posted - 2008.09.03 19:58:00 - [9] Who says they haven't been reduced OVERALL ? This could as well mean increased in 1.0 and severely decreased in 0.5, for a shorter average but a smaller spread. _ SHOPS \|\| Mission rewards revamp \|\| better nanofix
Piru Industrial	Posted - 2008.09.03 19:58:00 - [10] im a care bear and i am for suicide ganking. there should at least be some fear and thought in high sec. metal legs
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force	Posted - 2008.09.03 19:58:00 - [11] Who says they haven't been reduced OVERALL ? This could as well mean increased in 1.0 and severely decreased in 0.5, for a shorter average but a smaller spread. _ SHOPS \|\| Mission rewards revamp \|\| better nanofix
Piru Industrial	Posted - 2008.09.03 19:58:00 - [12] im a care bear and i am for suicide ganking. there should at least be some fear and thought in high sec. metal legs
Chainsaw Plankton IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE	Posted - 2008.09.03 20:01:00 - [13] Originally by: Celestial Divinity We all assumed reduced means less time not more :P SO now Suicide gankers can launch a good 2-3 Volleys at haulers instead of just 1 but I could already get off 2, and most of the time I forgot to overload given that I have tried twice, once with great success on a bestower, and once in fail fashion on a frigate, who knew torps would only hit for like 10 damage
Chainsaw Plankton IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE	Posted - 2008.09.03 20:01:00 - [14] Originally by: Celestial Divinity We all assumed reduced means less time not more :P SO now Suicide gankers can launch a good 2-3 Volleys at haulers instead of just 1 but I could already get off 2, and most of the time I forgot to overload given that I have tried twice, once with great success on a bestower, and once in fail fashion on a frigate, who knew torps would only hit for like 10 damage
Treelox Amarr Market Jihadist Revolutionary Party	Posted - 2008.09.03 20:17:00 - [15] Amazing, 4 hours ago you were "giving up", now you decieded to stay but biatch about something else. Sounds like a forum troll wannabe in training to me. --
Inara Subaka Caldari the united	Posted - 2008.09.03 20:17:00 - [16] Originally by: Chainsaw Plankton Originally by: Celestial Divinity We all assumed reduced means less time not more :P SO now Suicide gankers can launch a good 2-3 Volleys at haulers instead of just 1 but I could already get off 2, and most of the time I forgot to overload given that I have tried twice, once with great success on a bestower, and once in fail fashion on a frigate, who knew torps would only hit for like 10 damage Did you forget Target painters as well?
Alora Venoda GalTech Giant Space Amoeba	Posted - 2008.09.03 20:25:00 - [17] you do realize that can-baiting new players in a starter system can get you banned, right? ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ Take away the risk and it would make flying around in space utterly pointless. Take away the flying around part and you make EVE into a space themed spreadsheet application.
Artemis Rose Varion Galactic Accord Corporate Enterprise Syndicate	Posted - 2008.09.03 20:31:00 - [18] Originally by: Alora Venoda you do realize that can-baiting new players in a starter system can get you banned, right? You are right, but however, Amarr is not a starter system *** Currently Playing: Trolls from Outer Space Current Equipment: VISAcard chain mail, +2 Amulet of Epic Whine, Self Banstick +2 WTB: +666 E-peen killboard stats
Storms	Posted - 2008.09.03 20:36:00 - [19] how do you suicide nowadays? i took a break. still kestrels or cruise missiles are the shit now?
Celestial Divinity B'haxed Productions	Posted - 2008.09.03 20:38:00 - [20] Originally by: Alora Venoda you do realize that can-baiting new players in a starter system can get you banned, right? 1. It was in Amarr 2. The fight was agreed to before hand. The can was dropped so he could get aggro.
Storms	Posted - 2008.09.03 20:38:00 - [21] Originally by: Storms how do you suicide nowadays? i took a break. still kestrels or cruise missiles are the shit now?
Syringe Morphine Inc	Posted - 2008.09.03 20:40:00 - [22] Or... You could petition it and not post about it. --------- War isn't the answer. However, the objective isn't to provide answers rather than eliminate the question.
Chainsaw Plankton IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE	Posted - 2008.09.03 20:44:00 - [23] Originally by: Inara Subaka Originally by: Chainsaw Plankton Originally by: Celestial Divinity We all assumed reduced means less time not more :P SO now Suicide gankers can launch a good 2-3 Volleys at haulers instead of just 1 but I could already get off 2, and most of the time I forgot to overload given that I have tried twice, once with great success on a bestower, and once in fail fashion on a frigate, who knew torps would only hit for like 10 damage Did you forget Target painters as well? nope had 1
Storms	Posted - 2008.09.03 20:47:00 - [24] so what's the suicide set up? 0_o what ship that launches torps? O_O

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.