EVE Search - pos offline idea

All Channels

Assembly Hall

pos offline idea

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Tonkin D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.09.09 17:14:00 - [1] gm told me it would be great if i posted this in here to being to the devs offline towers can be a problem if they are on a moon that you want easy solution is to blow it up, get some buddys together and give it some hurt after 4-10 hours (depending on the pos) you killed it. taking that amount of time on a unused stucture in space is frankly a waste of time, if the tower has been abandend its no loss to the owner of it the owner has left eve. what i suggest is that towers have a time for being offline before they get set a to a abandend tower on which you can unanchor or refuel for yourself or corp use. currently my allaince has conquered a allaince and they have alot offline towers which they cannot recover, it would be fun to destroy them but even better after a while that you can steal that asset and re-use it against them. im not complaining about them if i wanted i nuke them but i think in future it will make better use out of offline towers that reducing them to dust. so here are the rules i suggest with offline towers 1. tower goes offline timer starts 2. 2 week or month down the line the tower changes to a abandend tower on which you can unanchor, or refuel and it will change into your corps name. 3. if 1 or 2 is not possible after time the tower becomes weaker having no power and hitpoints are reced dramaticly so you can kil them quickly and if they are put back online they regain their strengh instantly what you think guys edit this will work in low sec and high sec aswell so you dont need to wardec to kill them. tonkin
Tonkin D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.09.09 17:14:00 - [2] gm told me it would be great if i posted this in here to being to the devs offline towers can be a problem if they are on a moon that you want easy solution is to blow it up, get some buddys together and give it some hurt after 4-10 hours (depending on the pos) you killed it. taking that amount of time on a unused stucture in space is frankly a waste of time, if the tower has been abandend its no loss to the owner of it the owner has left eve. what i suggest is that towers have a time for being offline before they get set a to a abandend tower on which you can unanchor or refuel for yourself or corp use. currently my allaince has conquered a allaince and they have alot offline towers which they cannot recover, it would be fun to destroy them but even better after a while that you can steal that asset and re-use it against them. im not complaining about them if i wanted i nuke them but i think in future it will make better use out of offline towers that reducing them to dust. so here are the rules i suggest with offline towers 1. tower goes offline timer starts 2. 2 week or month down the line the tower changes to a abandend tower on which you can unanchor, or refuel and it will change into your corps name. 3. if 1 or 2 is not possible after time the tower becomes weaker having no power and hitpoints are reced dramaticly so you can kil them quickly and if they are put back online they regain their strengh instantly what you think guys edit this will work in low sec and high sec aswell so you dont need to wardec to kill them. tonkin
Tesseract d'Urberville Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord	Posted - 2008.09.09 18:43:00 - [3] Makes sense to me. Supported. --------------------------------- Thomas Hardy is going to eat your brains.
c4 t	Posted - 2008.09.09 19:26:00 - [4] Edited by: c4 t on 09/09/2008 19:26:49 reasonable idea but unnecessary plus i like the idea of something that i anchored in space is mine till it dies ____________________________________________________________________ mostly harmless
Drake Draconis	Posted - 2008.09.09 19:51:00 - [5] If you set up a POS and it runs out of fuel... it should be easily destroyed or should self destruct over time. It's ridiculous to see this problem cropping up because its likening to trashing up space. I'm in favor of any solution that makes it easier to remove offline'd stations.
Gone'Postal Warped Mining	Posted - 2008.09.10 10:54:00 - [6] It could be a use for the hacking skill personaly, Supported. Boost SISI VOTE NOW!
Archetype02 Comply Or Die G00DFELLAS	Posted - 2008.09.10 14:06:00 - [7] you can steal abandoned ships but not abandoned towers.. Supported. Signature needs to be resized to conform to the forum rules of no larger than 400 x 120 pixels with a maximum filesize of 24000 bytes. Navigator
Akiba Penrose The Movement	Posted - 2008.09.10 15:35:00 - [8]
Matrixcvd Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.09.10 22:27:00 - [9] definitely supported, after 3 days of being offlined the tower unanchors itself, nuff said
Tonkin D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.09.14 20:03:00 - [10] bump for great justice
NanDe YaNen The Funkalistic	Posted - 2008.09.14 20:06:00 - [11] Edited by: NanDe YaNen on 14/09/2008 20:06:25 Good idea on more than a few points. Tower capture == less tower production necessary == less boring grinding BS and more playing the game. --------------------------------------- Originally by: Red Raider A happy gamer isnt on the forums, they are playing the game unless they have an idea that they honestly think is helping out.
marie blueprint	Posted - 2008.09.15 09:06:00 - [12] you stole my i dea i posted this idea weeks ago still supported tho
Dana Serenity Guerillaz	Posted - 2008.09.15 09:24:00 - [13] Totally supported... Offline towers that take ages to blow up is stupid and the idea of being able to steal these assets is very appealing. The only change I would make is that I would make the timer much shorter before a tower gets tagged as abandoned, maybe 24 or at a push 48 hours. By doing this, an extra layer of depth would be added to 0.0 territoral conflicts as aggressors of territory would now have the ability to attack space by holding gates preventing fuel from getting to such poses until the POS is labeled abandoned, then simple going up and switching ownership (Though obviously this would be only done in weaker held territory such as systems where only 1-2 poses are claiming sov)
Venkul Mul Gallente	Posted - 2008.09.15 11:06:00 - [14] Simply no. You want the moon? You wardec the corporation and destroy the tower (in high sec) or you can destroy the tower even without a wardec in low sec/0.0. Towers of closed corporations are removed from the game but as long as the corporation exist the tower should stay anchored. As a added note CCP love you for destroying towers, as they are sold by NPC and so a isk sink.
Matrixcvd Caldari Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.09.16 17:21:00 - [15] Originally by: Venkul Mul Simply no. You want the moon? You wardec the corporation and destroy the tower (in high sec) or you can destroy the tower even without a wardec in low sec/0.0. Towers of closed corporations are removed from the game but as long as the corporation exist the tower should stay anchored. As a added note CCP love you for destroying towers, as they are sold by NPC and so a isk sink. why should you encourage the stationary shooting of objects for people who have not tended to their mess? why have a simple anchoring function not work both ways? why allow people to drop assets anywhere they feel like it where they know that only boredom can save them from being destroyed, not PVP prowess, not combat effectiveness but BOREDOM. I am sorry but this attitude of the most vile and useless carebear lot in this game needs to be cut out like stink rot from flesh. For too long the sick carebear has been allowed to clog up the gang with mechanics that favor boredem as the only defense tool.. You should be required to defend you assets not let some stupid game mechanic come to your aid
xDOTHEDEWx School of Applied Knowledge	Posted - 2008.09.24 19:00:00 - [16] I agree totally. A change in the game like this would help the small corps who don't have the firepower to go kill abandend towers. I support this!!!
DEATHsyphon IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE	Posted - 2008.09.24 19:14:00 - [17] Supported, Its a wast of isk just blowing them up. -------------------- I'm not not going to pod you!
Elhina Novae Sky's Edge	Posted - 2008.09.24 20:14:00 - [18] Leaving your POS without caring for it should be punished. ------------ Originally by: Boz Well Originally by: SurrenderMonkey ... There's an Amarr problem? Nothing that can't be solved by more Minmatar nerfs.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.