EVE Search - "Sanctuary" space

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Crime and Punishment

"Sanctuary" space

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Tuomas Arturi Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service 1	Posted - 2012.03.27 20:28:00 - [1] - Quote In light of all the 'new proposed' changes for high sec security, I'd like to throw an idea. "Sanctuary" space -- This would work like advanced 1.0GÇª.. or be 1.1 space. -All to those rules for safety apply that are being suggested -It would occupy an area of 5-6 systems (sorta like a little cosmos space) -Each race would have 1-2 zones of this -New players would enter the game here -New corps could get established -New players could gain confidence with there eve skills -No PvP (well, not without great sec. loss) Rewards for missioning would be low (but totally safe) Mining would be poor (but totally safe) other idea: - limits on ship size - limits Character skill points - Agent level limits
Katja Faith Republic Military School Minmatar Republic 0	Posted - 2012.03.27 20:31:00 - [2] - Quote How about the game be renamed to "Ponies and Carebears In Space?" Nice attempt at a troll, tho... 1/10
Vladimir McSquizzle Noli Me Tangere Pirate Coalition 0	Posted - 2012.03.27 20:34:00 - [3] - Quote And all ships will leave pretty rainbow sparkly trails behind them...
Bernie Nator Talocan Hive Talocan United 151	Posted - 2012.03.27 20:36:00 - [4] - Quote Vladimir McSquizzle wrote: And all ships will leave pretty rainbow sparkly trails behind them... Sounds good if we use our IMAAAAAAAAGINAAAAAAATION!
Tuomas Arturi Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service 1	Posted - 2012.03.27 20:41:00 - [5] - Quote Well, I'm definitively part of the HtFU crowd. In the end, CCP is going to cater to the "new paying players" who want something like what I proposed. My thoughts are if we don't come up with something good, we all (high sec. people) are going to have some crazy changes.
Lady Spank Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED 1954	Posted - 2012.03.27 20:41:00 - [6] - Quote How about you stop being a noob in high sec and do something that requires competence. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â)
Tuomas Arturi Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service 1	Posted - 2012.03.27 20:44:00 - [7] - Quote Lady Spank wrote: How about you stop being a noob in high sec and do something that requires competence. Glad you are here Lady..... solve the problem.
Jack Miton Lapse Of Sanity Exhale. 154	Posted - 2012.03.27 21:12:00 - [8] - Quote Lady Spank wrote: How about you stop being a noob in high sec and do something that requires competence. QFT. pirate tears, best tears. (i do agree that ccp are going to **** up highsec ganking but your corp needs to stop whining about it like little girls.)
Gnaw LF 26	Posted - 2012.03.27 21:57:00 - [9] - Quote Tuomas Arturi wrote: In light of all the 'new proposed' changes for high sec security, I'd like to throw an idea. "Sanctuary" space -- This would work like advanced 1.0GÇª.. or be 1.1 space. -All to those rules for safety apply that are being suggested -It would occupy an area of 4-5 systems (sorta like a little cosmos space) -Each race would have 1-2 zones of this -New players would enter the game here -New corps could get established -New players could gain confidence with there eve skills -No PvP (well, not without great sec. loss) Rewards for missioning would be low (but totally safe) Mining would be poor (but totally safe) - limits on ship size - limits Character skill points - Agent level limits The Hugs and Kisses forum section is that way ------->>>>>
Gnaw LF 26	Posted - 2012.03.27 21:59:00 - [10] - Quote Tuomas Arturi wrote: Well, I'm definitively part of the HtFU crowd. In the end, CCP is going to cater to the "new paying players" who want something like what I proposed. My thoughts are if we don't come up with something good, we all (high sec. people) are going to have some crazy changes. Those crazy changes can be summed up as "More PvP". Imagine that.

Evil Market Suddenly Violence Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service 0	Posted - 2012.03.27 23:41:00 - [11] - Quote The interesting thing is, this is not so far from what is suggested... just tweaked a little bit and moved to a select few systems rather than all of high sec... think about that... This is a idea to give a way of having that not happen to all of high sec, yet still appealing to the crowed that apparently cant handle being killed.
Tarryn Nightstorm Hellstar Towing and Recovery 321	Posted - 2012.03.27 23:55:00 - [12] - Quote Evil Market wrote: The interesting thing is, this is not so far from what is suggested... just tweaked a little bit and moved to a select few systems rather than all of high sec... think about that... This is a idea to give a way of having that not happen to all of high sec, yet still appealing to the crowed that apparently cant handle being killed. Indeed...But given the increasing carebear mentality I've been seeing of late, watch those systems get up to 1500+ in local from day one! [/cynicism] In irae, veritas.
Tuomas Arturi Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service 2	Posted - 2012.03.28 01:28:00 - [13] - Quote Tarryn Nightstorm wrote: Evil Market wrote: The interesting thing is, this is not so far from what is suggested... just tweaked a little bit and moved to a select few systems rather than all of high sec... think about that... This is a idea to give a way of having that not happen to all of high sec, yet still appealing to the crowed that apparently cant handle being killed. Indeed...But given the increasing carebear mentality I've been seeing of late, watch those systems get up to 1500+ in local from day one! [/cynicism] Im becoming cynical myself. While I am part of the HtFU crowd, I think CCP is moving away from the cool 'sandbox idea' that got me into the game in the first place and CCP currently is moving away from the GÇÿeve is hardGÇÖ tuff universe. These proposals I'm listing, I really don't like them, but see them as a tourniquet to keep high sec. tolerable.
Skippermonkey Tactical Knightmare 868	Posted - 2012.03.28 03:02:00 - [14] - Quote Tuomas, i am dissapoint VOTE SKIPPERMONKEY FOR CSM - TERRIBAD AT EVE BUT GREAT AT FORUMS show your support for me here
Florestan Bronstein United Highsec Front The 99 Percent 486	Posted - 2012.03.28 08:46:00 - [15] - Quote I, too, miss Shattrath and Dalaran.
Plaude Pollard Aliastra Gallente Federation 14	Posted - 2012.03.28 09:44:00 - [16] - Quote We already have this. It's called "Rookie Systems". Way to suggest something we already have. If you attack a player in a Rookie System, you can get banned, regardless of how old your victim is. Just look up Rookie System Griefing.
Misanth RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE 489	Posted - 2012.03.28 11:08:00 - [17] - Quote Why is this in C&P.. shiptoastin' liek a baws
Tuomas Arturi Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service 2	Posted - 2012.03.28 14:55:00 - [18] - Quote Skippermonkey wrote: Tuomas, i am dissapoint Me too. ..... Skip you have a better answer? Before the CCP begins to code all of Eve to rainbowland?
I Accidentally YourShip Amarrian Parasylum Brushie Brushie Brushie 156	Posted - 2012.03.28 15:00:00 - [19] - Quote Katja Faith wrote: How about the game be renamed to "Ponies and Carebears In Space?" Don't be associating ponies with carebears. Ponies > carebears, any day of the week. Vladimir McSquizzle wrote: And all ships will leave pretty rainbow sparkly trails behind them... I would sell my family for a rainbow trail.
Miranda Eternal Profiteers Empire Persona Non Gratis 2	Posted - 2012.03.28 17:15:00 - [20] - Quote They could just as easily make the sec standing acutaly mean something in this game. As the factions have acepted concord policeing so they just need to tweek it a bit more so that the gates do not function for negative sec status. Bring back in the black market tradeing skills so the -sec status people can buy through a npc corp agent the stuff they want in high sec but at an increased cost. Personaly id like to see stations refuse docking to negative standing players but still let them run around. ps bring on the trolls, i fully expect this to get flamed but they cant come up with proper replys so they have to whine.

Rivur'Tam the united Negative Ten. 11	Posted - 2012.03.28 17:35:00 - [21] - Quote Tuomas Arturi wrote: In light of all the 'new proposed' changes for high sec security, I'd like to throw an idea. "Sanctuary" space -- This would work like advanced 1.0GÇª.. or be 1.1 space. -All to those rules for safety apply that are being suggested -It would occupy an area of 4-5 systems (sorta like a little cosmos space) -Each race would have 1-2 zones of this -New players would enter the game here -New corps could get established -New players could gain confidence with there eve skills ~~-No PvP (well, not without great sec. loss)~~ Rewards for missioning would be low (~~but totally safe~~) Mining would be poor (~~but totally safe~~) - limits on ship size - limits Character skill points - Agent level limits that would be an acceptable suggestion like me if u agree Cry moar faggots
Herping yourDerp Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 426	Posted - 2012.03.28 18:17:00 - [22] - Quote Lady Spank wrote: How about you stop being a noob in high sec and do something that requires competence. like bot in nullsec
Sir John Halsey GWA Corp 0	Posted - 2012.03.28 18:39:00 - [23] - Quote Lady Spank wrote: How about you stop being a noob in high sec and do something that requires competence. Why not telling this to all the wannabe pirates crying rivers every time changes are made to highsec (notice the 'high' and 'security')
prolix travail Blue Mountain Trails 3	Posted - 2012.03.28 21:13:00 - [24] - Quote You're missing the point that 'high security' isn't 'total security'. ya dig?
Skjordr Longfang Tactical Knightmare 0	Posted - 2012.03.28 21:51:00 - [25] - Quote Skippermonkey wrote: Tuomas, i am dissapoint QFT, This is a terrible idea, and against the Ethos of EVE.
Sir John Halsey GWA Corp 0	Posted - 2012.03.28 22:00:00 - [26] - Quote prolix travail wrote: You're missing the point that 'high security' isn't 'total security'. ya dig? Of course not, this is why you can still shoot everyone in there. Total security will be if your guns won't lock on other players
Skippermonkey Tactical Knightmare 873	Posted - 2012.03.29 11:50:00 - [27] - Quote Katja Faith wrote: How about the game be renamed to "Ponies and Carebears In Space?" Nice attempt at a troll, tho... 1/10 this aint no troll SN need to protect their new recruits who keep dying My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny
Lady Spank Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED 1989	Posted - 2012.03.29 11:53:00 - [28] - Quote Thrill yourself (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â)
Skippermonkey Tactical Knightmare 873	Posted - 2012.03.29 11:54:00 - [29] - Quote Lady Spank wrote: Thrill yourself pass me the rope My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny
Skippermonkey Tactical Knightmare 874	Posted - 2012.03.29 12:20:00 - [30] - Quote David Carradine was onto something here.... cant... ..... ... breathe..... .... ... My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.