Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Tuomas Arturi
Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 20:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
In light of all the 'new proposed' changes for high sec security, I'd like to throw an idea.
"Sanctuary" space -- This would work like advanced 1.0GǪ.. or be 1.1 space.
-All to those rules for safety apply that are being suggested -It would occupy an area of 5-6 systems (sorta like a little cosmos space) -Each race would have 1-2 zones of this -New players would enter the game here -New corps could get established -New players could gain confidence with there eve skills -No PvP (well, not without great sec. loss)
*Rewards for missioning would be low (but totally safe) *Mining would be poor (but totally safe)
other idea: - limits on ship size - limits Character skill points - Agent level limits |

Katja Faith
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 20:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
How about the game be renamed to "Ponies and Carebears In Space?"
Nice attempt at a troll, tho... 1/10 |

Vladimir McSquizzle
Noli Me Tangere Pirate Coalition
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 20:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
And all ships will leave pretty rainbow sparkly trails behind them... |

Bernie Nator
Talocan Hive Talocan United
151
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 20:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
Vladimir McSquizzle wrote:And all ships will leave pretty rainbow sparkly trails behind them...
Sounds good if we use our
IMAAAAAAAAGINAAAAAAATION! |

Tuomas Arturi
Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 20:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
Well, I'm definitively part of the HtFU crowd.
In the end, CCP is going to cater to the "new paying players" who want something like what I proposed. My thoughts are if we don't come up with something good, we all (high sec. people) are going to have some crazy changes. |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1954
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 20:41:00 -
[6] - Quote
How about you stop being a noob in high sec and do something that requires competence. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Tuomas Arturi
Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 20:44:00 -
[7] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:How about you stop being a noob in high sec and do something that requires competence.
Glad you are here Lady..... solve the problem. 
|

Jack Miton
Lapse Of Sanity Exhale.
154
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 21:12:00 -
[8] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:How about you stop being a noob in high sec and do something that requires competence.
QFT. pirate tears, best tears.
(i do agree that ccp are going to **** up highsec ganking but your corp needs to stop whining about it like little girls.) |

Gnaw LF
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 21:57:00 -
[9] - Quote
Tuomas Arturi wrote:In light of all the 'new proposed' changes for high sec security, I'd like to throw an idea.
"Sanctuary" space -- This would work like advanced 1.0GǪ.. or be 1.1 space.
-All to those rules for safety apply that are being suggested -It would occupy an area of 4-5 systems (sorta like a little cosmos space) -Each race would have 1-2 zones of this -New players would enter the game here -New corps could get established -New players could gain confidence with there eve skills -No PvP (well, not without great sec. loss)
*Rewards for missioning would be low (but totally safe) *Mining would be poor (but totally safe) - limits on ship size - limits Character skill points - Agent level limits
The Hugs and Kisses forum section is that way ------->>>>> |

Gnaw LF
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 21:59:00 -
[10] - Quote
Tuomas Arturi wrote:Well, I'm definitively part of the HtFU crowd.
In the end, CCP is going to cater to the "new paying players" who want something like what I proposed. My thoughts are if we don't come up with something good, we all (high sec. people) are going to have some crazy changes.
Those crazy changes can be summed up as "More PvP". Imagine that. |
|

Evil Market
Suddenly Violence Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 23:41:00 -
[11] - Quote
The interesting thing is, this is not so far from what is suggested... just tweaked a little bit and moved to a select few systems rather than all of high sec...
think about that... This is a idea to give a way of having that not happen to all of high sec, yet still appealing to the crowed that apparently cant handle being killed. |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
321
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 23:55:00 -
[12] - Quote
Evil Market wrote:The interesting thing is, this is not so far from what is suggested... just tweaked a little bit and moved to a select few systems rather than all of high sec...
think about that... This is a idea to give a way of having that not happen to all of high sec, yet still appealing to the crowed that apparently cant handle being killed.
Indeed...But given the increasing carebear mentality I've been seeing of late, watch those systems get up to 1500+ in local from day one!
[/cynicism]
In irae, veritas. |

Tuomas Arturi
Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 01:28:00 -
[13] - Quote
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:Evil Market wrote:The interesting thing is, this is not so far from what is suggested... just tweaked a little bit and moved to a select few systems rather than all of high sec...
think about that... This is a idea to give a way of having that not happen to all of high sec, yet still appealing to the crowed that apparently cant handle being killed. Indeed...But given the increasing carebear mentality I've been seeing of late, watch those systems get up to 1500+ in local from day one! [/cynicism]
Im becoming cynical myself. While I am part of the HtFU crowd, I think CCP is moving away from the cool 'sandbox idea' that got me into the game in the first place and CCP currently is moving away from the GÇÿeve is hardGÇÖ tuff universe. These proposals I'm listing, I really don't like them, but see them as a tourniquet to keep high sec. tolerable. |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
868
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 03:02:00 -
[14] - Quote
Tuomas, i am dissapoint
|

Florestan Bronstein
United Highsec Front The 99 Percent
486
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 08:46:00 -
[15] - Quote
I, too, miss Shattrath and Dalaran. |

Plaude Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 09:44:00 -
[16] - Quote
We already have this. It's called "Rookie Systems". Way to suggest something we already have. If you attack a player in a Rookie System, you can get banned, regardless of how old your victim is. Just look up Rookie System Griefing.
|

Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
489
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 11:08:00 -
[17] - Quote
Why is this in C&P.. shiptoastin' liek a baws |

Tuomas Arturi
Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 14:55:00 -
[18] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:Tuomas, i am dissapoint
Me too. ..... Skip you have a better answer? Before the CCP begins to code all of Eve to rainbowland? |

I Accidentally YourShip
Amarrian Parasylum Brushie Brushie Brushie
156
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:00:00 -
[19] - Quote
Katja Faith wrote:How about the game be renamed to "Ponies and Carebears In Space?"
Don't be associating ponies with carebears. Ponies > carebears, any day of the week.
Vladimir McSquizzle wrote:And all ships will leave pretty rainbow sparkly trails behind them...
I would sell my family for a rainbow trail. |

Miranda
Eternal Profiteers Empire Persona Non Gratis
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 17:15:00 -
[20] - Quote
They could just as easily make the sec standing acutaly mean something in this game. As the factions have acepted concord policeing so they just need to tweek it a bit more so that the gates do not function for negative sec status.
Bring back in the black market tradeing skills so the -sec status people can buy through a npc corp agent the stuff they want in high sec but at an increased cost.
Personaly id like to see stations refuse docking to negative standing players but still let them run around.
ps bring on the trolls, i fully expect this to get flamed but they cant come up with proper replys so they have to whine. |
|

Rivur'Tam
the united Negative Ten.
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 17:35:00 -
[21] - Quote
Tuomas Arturi wrote:In light of all the 'new proposed' changes for high sec security, I'd like to throw an idea.
"Sanctuary" space -- This would work like advanced 1.0GǪ.. or be 1.1 space.
-All to those rules for safety apply that are being suggested -It would occupy an area of 4-5 systems (sorta like a little cosmos space) -Each race would have 1-2 zones of this -New players would enter the game here -New corps could get established -New players could gain confidence with there eve skills
-No PvP (well, not without great sec. loss)
*Rewards for missioning would be low (but totally safe) *Mining would be poor (but totally safe) - limits on ship size - limits Character skill points - Agent level limits
that would be an acceptable suggestion
like me if u agree Cry moar faggots |

Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
426
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 18:17:00 -
[22] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:How about you stop being a noob in high sec and do something that requires competence.
like bot in nullsec |

Sir John Halsey
GWA Corp
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 18:39:00 -
[23] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:How about you stop being a noob in high sec and do something that requires competence.
Why not telling this to all the wannabe pirates crying rivers every time changes are made to highsec (notice the 'high' and 'security')
|

prolix travail
Blue Mountain Trails
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 21:13:00 -
[24] - Quote
You're missing the point that 'high security' isn't 'total security'. ya dig? |

Skjordr Longfang
Tactical Knightmare
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 21:51:00 -
[25] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:Tuomas, i am dissapoint
QFT, This is a terrible idea, and against the Ethos of EVE. |

Sir John Halsey
GWA Corp
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 22:00:00 -
[26] - Quote
prolix travail wrote:You're missing the point that 'high security' isn't 'total security'. ya dig?
Of course not, this is why you can still shoot everyone in there. Total security will be if your guns won't lock on other players  |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
873
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 11:50:00 -
[27] - Quote
Katja Faith wrote:How about the game be renamed to "Ponies and Carebears In Space?"
Nice attempt at a troll, tho... 1/10
this aint no troll
SN need to protect their new recruits who keep dying My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1989
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 11:53:00 -
[28] - Quote
Thrill yourself (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
873
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 11:54:00 -
[29] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Thrill yourself pass me the rope My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
874
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 12:20:00 -
[30] - Quote
David Carradine was onto something here....
cant... ..... ... breathe..... .... ...
My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |