EVE Search - [AUCTION] Thanatos in 0,8 system

All Channels

Sell Orders

[AUCTION] Thanatos in 0,8 system

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Zefran Cochran Gallente White Nova Industries AAA Citizens	Posted - 2008.09.16 23:53:00 - [1] Up for an auction is a Thanatos fitted with 3x CCC rigs in Inaro 0.8 security system, 4 jumps from Jita and with 8 asteroid belts in system. Starting/minimum bid: 3bil Minimum bid increment: 100mil Reserve: 5bil Sniper rule: 15min Closing date and time: September 21st, 2008 @ 1800 EVE-Time Happy bidding.
AnnaJones	Posted - 2008.09.17 00:51:00 - [2] I'll start at 1B if not a free bump
Traxman	Posted - 2008.09.17 04:26:00 - [3] 1.1B To other buyers, the ship is only allowed to mine, any other activity fighting and/or support is not allowed. I guess podding corp members are ok
Aliedora	Posted - 2008.09.17 08:26:00 - [4] ratting?
JuGGeR Phantom Squad Axiom Empire	Posted - 2008.09.17 09:12:00 - [5] 2,5 Phantomsquad
Elaine Celeste Celeste Industries	Posted - 2008.09.17 10:47:00 - [6] Originally by: Traxman 1.1B To other buyers, the ship is only allowed to mine, any other activity fighting and/or support is not allowed. I guess podding corp members are ok Rather sure you're allowed to do missions with 'em (assuming there's no gates, of course). You're free to do whatever you want as long as it does not harm other players. CELESTE LOTTERIES: Where losing is almost harder than winning... almost.
Lucille Austero	Posted - 2008.09.17 11:55:00 - [7] Hrmm. How many mining drone IIs can it launch at once?
JohnnyGoofy Danish Trade and Mining Inc.	Posted - 2008.09.17 13:56:00 - [8] Originally by: Lucille Austero Hrmm. How many mining drone IIs can it launch at once? 15 with carrier lvl 5, drones lvl 5 and advance drone interfacing 5 + 5 drone control units in highslots. Realistic? 13-14 mining drones /JohnnyGoofy
Black Tangent Mega Corp Research	Posted - 2008.09.17 13:59:00 - [9] Originally by: JohnnyGoofy Originally by: Lucille Austero Hrmm. How many mining drone IIs can it launch at once? 15 with carrier lvl 5, drones lvl 5 and advance drone interfacing 5 + 5 drone control units in highslots. Realistic? 13-14 mining drones /JohnnyGoofy You don't own a carrier do you? The correct answer is 10 max
Peet Flosse Amarr	Posted - 2008.09.17 14:07:00 - [10] lol you own also no carrier or? he was complete right ... 10 without skills at 5 but without drone control units, so 14-15 is realistic. blub
Zefran Cochran Gallente White Nova Industries AAA Citizens	Posted - 2008.09.17 16:09:00 - [11] Dear bidders or interested parties, To answer some of the questions that were put forth, and to clarify any arguments: A carrier in empire can indeed deploy 15 Mining Drone IIs, or for that matter any drones including fighters, as long as the rules set fourth for Capital ships located in empire are not broken. These rules were, I believe first mentioned or set by GM Grimmi and quoting them: "We have therefore decided to set the following rules for capitals in high sec: 1. Capital ships may under no circumstances be used for aggression. 2. If at war, or with war declaration pending, you may not take your capital ship out of station. 3. You may not use your capital shipÆs attributes to gain any sort of advantage over other players while in high security space. 4. Breach any of the above and receive 2 weeks ban and off to low sec with your capital." Full transcript of this can be found here: http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=856260&page=30#888 Besides the fact that you have an opportunity to own a capital ship that can strip belts with very little effort (while you are watching a movie or perhaps playing with your other toon or even fragging mates in CS:S ), owning such a ship has a "collectors" value as well, as it is no longer possible to have your capital built in empire. For those who seek to be famous, this is a great toy that attracts our newer, to the game, pilots who have not seen such a ship before - it is a tourist attraction... we all know how Mr. Chribba got due to this. Thank you, -Zef

Chribba Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire	Posted - 2008.09.17 18:14:00 - [12] Sounds nice, however I wonder how it ended up in 0.8 seeing as carriers could never be built in systems above 0.7 - assume this was a reimbursed ship back in the days that then got moved back after the new capital rules? Secure 3rd party service ■ Veldspar

Sister Rebecca Amarr Imperial Academy	Posted - 2008.09.17 18:30:00 - [13] 3b for a unique ship If what Chribba says is true.
Zefran Cochran Gallente White Nova Industries AAA Citizens	Posted - 2008.09.17 21:13:00 - [14] Originally by: Chribba Sounds nice, however I wonder how it ended up in 0.8 seeing as carriers could never be built in systems above 0.7 - assume this was a reimbursed ship back in the days that then got moved back after the new capital rules? That is correct, it ended up being moved back to Inaro.
Dr Missy Fyre Industries	Posted - 2008.09.17 21:16:00 - [15] I've sent you an offer in game

Chribba Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire	Posted - 2008.09.17 21:49:00 - [16] Originally by: Zefran Cochran Originally by: Chribba Sounds nice, however I wonder how it ended up in 0.8 seeing as carriers could never be built in systems above 0.7 - assume this was a reimbursed ship back in the days that then got moved back after the new capital rules? That is correct, it ended up being moved back to Inaro. I can see some GM getting slapped for that then since reimbursed capitals afaik isn't allowed (and certainly not ones that never have been able to be built there). Good luck with the sale though. Secure 3rd party service ■ Veldspar

Lucille Austero	Posted - 2008.09.18 11:51:00 - [17] i'd love to get a piece of this. carebear to the max. lol. unfortunately i'm too far away from flying it. good luck though
MasterOfDDesaster Aliastra	Posted - 2008.09.18 13:31:00 - [18] whats the actual price? And a free bump
Antibac Wreckless Abandon	Posted - 2008.09.18 13:35:00 - [19] Originally by: ChribbaI can see some GM getting slapped for that then since reimbursed capitals afaik isn't allowed (and certainly not ones that never have been able to be built there). Good luck with the sale though.[/quote As I understand, reimbursed supercaps have never been awarded. "Normal" caps are definately reimbursed however, I've had first hand experience of this with a carrier in the past.

Chribba Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire	Posted - 2008.09.18 14:16:00 - [20] Originally by: Antibac Edited by: Antibac on 18/09/2008 13:35:04 Originally by: Chribba I can see some GM getting slapped for that then since reimbursed capitals afaik isn't allowed (and certainly not ones that never have been able to be built there). Good luck with the sale though. As I understand, reimbursed supercaps have never been awarded. "Normal" caps are definately reimbursed however, I've had first hand experience of this with a carrier in the past. edit: I R quoting n00b At least in the past, reimbursing a dread/carrier - and placing it in 0.8 or above has always been a no-no - unless the ship was destroyed in said system, hence my point, carriers have _never_ been able to be built in 0.8-1.0 systems, that's why I felt that this ship is a GM reimbursing said ship into the wrong system, and usually they get told that. Summer 2005, Dreads are introduced, could be built in any NPC station. Winter 2005, NPC building was nerfed, Carriers introduced, POSes in 0.4-0.7 introduced and allowed building of Dreads/Carriers in LSAA's. Summer 2007, High-sec LSAA's nerfed, Rorqual's introduced. Thus marking the end of all Dread/Carrier/Rorqual production in high-sec. Hence why carriers never have been able to be in systems above 0.7 unless reimbursed by a GM by misstake, atleast before they have been deemed an exploit no matter how it ended up there. Secure 3rd party service ■ Veldspar

waferzankko Caldari Bears Inc Violent-Tendencies	Posted - 2008.09.18 15:05:00 - [21] I would like to bid on this item, however is this just going to get moved to lowsec as it was not made in a 0.8 system?
Zefran Cochran Gallente White Nova Industries AAA Citizens	Posted - 2008.09.18 19:15:00 - [22] No, the carrier is not going to be moved anywhere as long as the owner does not violate the capital ship rules in high security space quoted by me earlier. The carrier is still being auctioned. The auction is still open. Thank you. -Zef
beatyouup	Posted - 2008.09.19 10:16:00 - [23] is'nt mining or doing missions in a carrier creating an advantage over other people aswell ?
Lucille Austero	Posted - 2008.09.19 11:49:00 - [24] Originally by: beatyouup is'nt mining or doing missions in a carrier creating an advantage over other people aswell ? From what i can tell earlier in the post the GMs are concerned about engaging other players in pvp in a cap ship, mining in a bigger ship than everyone else is not an advantage over other players.
Dr Missy Fyre Industries	Posted - 2008.09.19 20:07:00 - [25] Sale agreed pending confirmation as discussed :)
Zefran Cochran Gallente White Nova Industries AAA Citizens	Posted - 2008.09.19 20:12:00 - [26] Confirmed. Pending settlement.
Veritech knight	Posted - 2008.09.19 21:32:00 - [27] please contact me if the sale doesnt go thru. thanks vk
Zefran Cochran Gallente White Nova Industries AAA Citizens	Posted - 2008.09.20 22:00:00 - [28] I was considering a trade for this item but have been contacted by numerous parties asking for the auction to go through. So i'm extending the auction 48 hrs till Tuesday September 23rd 1800 EVE-Time. I apologize for mixed messages, and hope interested parties will continue to participate in this auction. -Zef
Lucille Austero	Posted - 2008.09.20 22:29:00 - [29] let the flames begin :) glad to see this is back on the block. i'm curious to see the outcome, although i don't think i'll be able to afford it.
matarkhan Soldi di Protezione	Posted - 2008.09.21 01:18:00 - [30] HEY, SELLING THIS THING FOR MAD PROFIT IS CLAIMING AN UNFAIR ADVANTAGE WITH IT. You know, over poor sods like myself. Anyway, just kidding, free bump, and GL.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.