EVE Search - Turret Balance and the new Accuracy

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Turret Balance and the new Accuracy

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
monkeyman33	Posted - 2004.06.25 14:09:00 - [151] Originally by: Gariuys Originally by: monkeyman33 Originally by: Gariuys Originally by: monkeyman33 Originally by: Joshua Calvert monkeyman makes an interesting point about frigate modules affecting battleships. Josh, Thanks, but I proabably have to go to a different forum to have a devteam member not respond or just say no.......Not feeling love here lol, it's been like 3 hours since you posted the exact same thing as oh I don't know 50 or so other people in various threads all over these forums, and you're concerned that no actual dev ( which wouldn't happen period in any other game ) has replied to your particulair concern yet. Things don't work like that. Read this thread completely and you'll get some answers other then that you're forced to do the rest as most of us. Get a setup that works right now, and wait how the tweaks work out. ( But I wouldn't count on a mayor overhaul again ) Gratz on posting in the right forum and correct thread this time though. ;) Yeh I got a setup that works...called frigate..why did I waste all this time training large turrets and others when there is no tactical advantage anymore. If they don't rehaul this lots of players or going to leave. And thanks for the sarcastic comment about posting in the right forum...still haven't heard a logical reason from anyone why large turrest should have problems hitting a small target at rest.........anyone...anyone...beuller...bueller... monkeyman There are other options then getting into a frigate, experiment more, you didn't come up with your old battleship setup in 30 minutes did you? I have no problems downing frigates whatsoever in my battleship. Your welcome about the sarcastic comment, which wasn't actually sarcastic, geez people should lighten up a little, nothing we say or do here will end the world. The reason is quite simple, battleships shouldn't not be the end all do all end game ship, it makes for a boring game. A reason that might work for you, you're trying to hit a fly with a building sized turret which uses big cars as ammo. I actually spent a long time on a load out that works for my BS, I guess I am just expressing a long line of frustrations that I have had with the new patch....What further aggrivates it is that I am not sure anyone at CCP cares. I guess running three warp stabs is the only option for a BS which is enough to either run a weak weapon rig with target and damage assists, or not. The other frustrating thing is ok....I rig my ship now..but all the turret computations are in flux, so all testing I do now is eradicated by the next hotfix...... I still think the result is my interceptor or frigate will be a hell of a lot more fun to fly than a bs...and is that something we want in this game? monkeyman
Jorev	Posted - 2004.06.25 18:00:00 - [152] Yeah, given the changes to turrets and supposed tweaks to come, the game came to a standstill now. Should I but more named rails? Sell the ones I have? Train missiles? Who the heck knows? My megathron along with 3m of combat-turret-gallente combat skills are idle now and will be for a while. Thanks devs.
Shocky	Posted - 2004.06.25 18:23:00 - [153] I turned my tempest into a missile boat. Forget Projectiles, there as good as worthless now.
Rod Blaine	Posted - 2004.06.25 19:19:00 - [154] Edited by: Rod Blaine on 25/06/2004 19:24:50 Quote: I agree with you on the graphs, that's not what turrets are doing atm, and I do think some more checking and tuning is needed.:] Aside from the whole optimal and what turrets are supposed to be able to do discussions, them graphs are plain wrong indeed. I will hit for most damage when about 10km ABOVE the optimal+falloff anytime. I am using plutonium ammo (second shortest range one) at fecking 95+km and hitting for 600+ wreckings. Now at 60km (optimal) I hit for **** against NPC BS with a <10m/sec transversal speed. This is one helluva dissapointing post by Tomb which again shows HOW DAMN LITTLE TESTING IS ACTUALLY BEING DONE BY CCP _______________________________________________ Yes yes, blogging is passÚ I know. Rod's Ramblingz on Eve-Online Solutions to your issues.
Managalar	Posted - 2004.07.22 00:50:00 - [155] where did the graphs go? =======Abaddon======= =======Abaddon=======
Managalar	Posted - 2004.07.22 00:50:00 - [156] where did the graphs go? =======Abaddon======= =======Abaddon=======
Bral	Posted - 2004.08.23 20:32:00 - [157] The pics in the original message cannot be seen because their links are broken. Please restore them.
Bral	Posted - 2004.08.23 20:32:00 - [158] The pics in the original message cannot be seen because their links are broken. Please restore them.
Meatead	Posted - 2004.08.23 21:07:00 - [159] yup links broken....and nothing in the archive dev blog either - all graphs seems to have mysteriously vanished. This could obviously be a very simple mistake, or a cover up for broken 'balance'. Either way it doesnt inspire confidence
Meatead	Posted - 2004.08.23 21:07:00 - [160] yup links broken....and nothing in the archive dev blog either - all graphs seems to have mysteriously vanished. This could obviously be a very simple mistake, or a cover up for broken 'balance'. Either way it doesnt inspire confidence

Karrde CZ	Posted - 2004.10.13 20:24:00 - [161] Still broken!!!!! Restore them damn it! .............................. 2005.03.23 05:41:55combatYour 720mm Howitzer Artillery II perfectly strikes Mercenary Fighter, wrecking for 879.0 damage.
Karrde CZ	Posted - 2004.10.13 20:24:00 - [162] Still broken!!!!! Restore them damn it! .............................. 2005.03.23 05:41:55combatYour 720mm Howitzer Artillery II perfectly strikes Mercenary Fighter, wrecking for 879.0 damage.
Karrde CZ	Posted - 2004.12.01 14:32:00 - [163] Pictures please???? .............................. 2005.03.23 05:41:55combatYour 720mm Howitzer Artillery II perfectly strikes Mercenary Fighter, wrecking for 879.0 damage.
Karrde CZ	Posted - 2004.12.01 14:32:00 - [164] Pictures please???? .............................. 2005.03.23 05:41:55combatYour 720mm Howitzer Artillery II perfectly strikes Mercenary Fighter, wrecking for 879.0 damage.
Siddy	Posted - 2004.12.01 15:56:00 - [165] Who dears to bump this rotting old treadh! -------------------------------------------
Siddy	Posted - 2004.12.01 15:56:00 - [166] Who dears to bump this rotting old treadh! -------------------------------------------


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.