EVE Search - ZLZ-1Z TCF offical battle report

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

ZLZ-1Z TCF offical battle report

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 10:45:00 - [1] Edited by: Butter Dog on 08/10/2008 10:52:12 Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam I'm amazed and sorry that for once you only brought so few numbers (~100?) to the fight, so that we could chop you down 1 by 1 while you were stuck loading your screen. why dont you deploy caps against a small offline tower and lose 25 dreads about it ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 11:20:00 - [2] Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 08/10/2008 10:52:12 Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam I'm amazed and sorry that for once you only brought so few numbers (~100?) to the fight, so that we could chop you down 1 by 1 while you were stuck loading your screen. why dont you deploy caps against a small offline tower and lose 25 dreads about it Why don't you actually be in local and get a clue. because its more fun to troll your stupidity on CAOD? ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 11:30:00 - [3] Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam Resorting to calling people names when all your arguments fail is your most common "troll", shall we say. Please, continue. you are TCF's best poaster ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 11:40:00 - [4] Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam Resorting to calling people names when all your arguments fail is your most common "troll", shall we say. Please, continue. you are TCF's best poaster Is that suppose to mean anything? why dont you deploy caps against a small offline tower and lose 25 dreads about it ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 11:47:00 - [5] Originally by: Norsey Not having highend moonmining as an excuse for not holding your own is a poor excuse in my opinion, FDN doesnt have highend moon mining, we managed to hold our own against TCF and Red allianse on many occasion. This is an incredibly poorly thought out statement. TRI are fighting a vastly numerically and resource superior opponent. Calling them out as making 'excuses' for not holding their own is ridiculous. Why the hell should they? You could at best describe them as a 'medium sized' alliance. An alliance with the resources of TCF should be able to take them on alone. That they bring KIA/Daisho/Goons along is fine, if thats what they want to do. But no-one of any sensible disposition could possibly complain that TRI get a little helping hand every so often from Uncle BoB. The logic behind your arguement (and that of all the other TRI detractors moaning that they're not getting uberblobbed alone) is so flawed I can't understand how they even have the nerve to articulate it. To paraphrase a great philosopher: get real. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 11:52:00 - [6] Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Norsey Not having highend moonmining as an excuse for not holding your own is a poor excuse in my opinion, FDN doesnt have highend moon mining, we managed to hold our own against TCF and Red allianse on many occasion. This is an incredibly poorly thought out statement. TRI are fighting a vastly numerically and resource superior opponent. Calling them out as making 'excuses' for not holding their own is ridiculous. Why the hell should they? You could at best describe them as a 'medium sized' alliance. An alliance with the resources of TCF should be able to take them on alone. That they bring KIA/Daisho/Goons along is fine, if thats what they want to do. But no-one of any sensible disposition could possibly complain that TRI get a little helping hand every so often from Uncle BoB. The logic behind your arguement (and that of all the other TRI detractors moaning that they're not getting uberblobbed alone) is so flawed I can't understand how they even have the nerve to articulate it. To paraphrase a great philosopher: get real. Why don't you grow up and get a clue? why dont you deploy caps against a small offline tower and lose 25 dreads about it ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 11:55:00 - [7] Originally by: Alekanderu aren't you that iss navy guy who made an ass out of himself on these forums a while ago you must be getting confused with another butter dog PS - nice corp ticker, always a mark of forum quality ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 12:01:00 - [8] Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam Ran out of arguments? Ran out of names? Come on dude, you're much better than this. I feel you can do it. Given that you responded to my logical arguement with a 'grow and get a clue' troll, perhaps you need to follow your own advice in this instance? Just saying... ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 12:14:00 - [9] Originally by: joshua cane butter stay in empire we are fighting KIA/Daisho/Goons vs tri/bob/axion/executive/interdiction/rionna/southern cross Don't try and spin it. You're attacking TRI space, and TRI specifically. That is your stated goal. They get the odd roaming gang from Goodfellas to help out. They get the odd cap hotdrop from GBC. 99% of the time it is you V's TRI. The other entities you menion aren't involved in the slightest. Apart from once when they hotdropped you. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 12:34:00 - [10] Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam Originally by: NokNok Originally by: joshua cane and all tcf dreads are replaced and we aren't like 90 % eve alliance : omfg they have a cap fleet: warp out!! warp out !!dock!! dock!! like tri :) Anyway cya soon in space. You mean 'Oh, they cynoed in their caps, cya' Why don't you grow up and get a clue? ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 13:33:00 - [11] Originally by: Thodoros The TCF/Goons fleet leave the field having lost the battle but having inlfict more damage to their enemies? Did Fred0 tell you this or are your fantasies coming from within? ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 13:36:00 - [12] Originally by: Black Jumper Edited by: Black Jumper on 08/10/2008 13:26:23 What began as a nice thread, was shred apart by butter dog the internet Whorum warrior and a few pubbies too shy to post with their main. Excuse me, but TCF started this shitposting and bullcrap. I just hightlighted that, and the flames they burned ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 14:09:00 - [13] Originally by: Goberth Ludwig Originally by: Deva Blackfire Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam To be honest, hearing TRI cap fleet cynoed out after ours cynoed in (while having equals size and composition) around 15 TRI dreads vs around 30 TCF dreads is not "equal composition" even when total number of caps is similiar. Even at fights with 100 caps per side having 10 dreads advantage can win it easily so it has to say something about 50 man cap fleets and 15 dread advantage. What he really meant is: why didnt our fc cyno on top of the tri caps while bubbling them instead of using a POS and letting them all get away? - Gob Perhaps their capital FC gave MM/RZR consultancy in M-O that time they 'hotdropped' BoB by waiting for them to finish destroying a tower, THEN cyno'ing in 80 caps at a random gate. That sure worked well. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 14:22:00 - [14] Originally by: Zynch So, when facing an even numbered capital fleet, you're knit picking about capital ship types to justify your escape, but when your capital fleet succeeds against an outnumbering conventional fleet, that's because they're noobs? Er, the ship types are rather important in cap v cap fights. Dreads > Carriers. By a very large degree. Didn't you know that? Sure explains the 'caps at a gate' thing... ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 18:00:00 - [15] Edited by: Butter Dog on 08/10/2008 18:01:16 Originally by: titanstory yesterday, your and us cap fleet was the same, but anyway you didn't fight again. you asked help to bob for hotdrop us. you just use your cap when we are in bs, but anyway after the nanoland, its the no-balls-land TRI. You're calling a single alliance, smaller than yours, 'no balls'... and yet you are the who is fighting them with Goons/KIA/Daisho/MM/RZR etc If you had balls, you'd fight Tri 1v1. Then maybe the GBC wouldn't need to get involved. But oh no, you have to bring the blob along don't you. What does that say about your confidence in your own abilities? Are you jealous that TCF have never and will never accomplish anything alone? Honestly, I've rarely read such pathetic and groundless comments. Grow up, TCF. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.08 19:16:00 - [16] Originally by: titanstory dude who are you ? when you didnt know how this fight have started, dont speak about, thx. we were just TCF vs TRI whith the same numbers of caps. Repeately stating a lie does not make it a truth. This fight is not TCF V TRI and we all know that. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.09 05:10:00 - [17] Originally by: Mylea Tenebrae so Tri and TCF are agree : in 1vs1 TCF is more powerful than Tri If you really believed this, you wouldn't have Goons/Kia/Daisho holding your hand. And although you have more members, I don't think 1v1 you would beat them. At all. You might have the resources to replace dreads, but what you don't have are 100% hardcore pvpers with lots of experience, and your typical gang make up of random crap ships reflects this. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.09 22:04:00 - [18] Originally by: Lasakywa Edited by: Lasakywa on 09/10/2008 21:57:16 Originally by: Darknesss ummm not us? 150? lol. Moar like 100 ok Trolling them based on events which took place over a year ago just show how desperate for material you are. PS - love the mix of short/long range BS fittings, very 'avant garde' ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.10 07:21:00 - [19] Originally by: Fish Brain Originally by: KIAEddZ Originally by: Goberth Ludwig HEY HANDS OF MY **ING DYSPRO Your dyspro mining arrays are already dead Gob, they just don't know it yet. ;) x Did you say the same thing about our tech mining arrays too? ;) x quite a nice burn there I'm still waiting for the TCF battle report where they claim victory... or did I miss that post already? ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog'** Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.10 09:13:00 - [20] Originally by: Lasakywa well the tower was not the problem, it could have been a med, large or megalarge, idiot..The problem was the hotdrop, you know, the one you didn't bring coz you were too "omg, i dont wana get owned by tcf" edit for waaga : no stront left, we shooted a pos and some stuff before your hotdrop. If you're going to hotdrop, try actually cyno'ing in on their capitals, rather than a random POS. Might find it works better for you. Thought you might have learnt that after the epic NC 'hotdrop' of M-O which involved cynoing in at a gate, then not entering siege, and then dying. I see a pattern emerging here...
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.10 13:26:00 - [21] Originally by: bulabuba You guys really should listen to this guy. When you have the FC of the mighty ISSN telling you that you're doing it wrong, it's time to listen. I've heard that talking about a corp I was in 2 years ago makes your posts somehow relevant. I'm not convinced. Try harder
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.10 14:44:00 - [22] Sorry, I must be getting confused here. People are saying TCF could beat TRI 1v1? Then why have they lost every single fight so far? And thats with the help of KIA/Daisho/Goon/MM/RZR
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.10 15:12:00 - [23] Originally by: KIAEddZ Edited by: KIAEddZ on 10/10/2008 15:02:12 Originally by: Wesley Baird stuff But TCF would gang **** Tri so hard if you didnt have BoB holding your hand right now Wesley. Wether you like it or not, you are living under their capital umbrella. Form up 60 bs at alarm clock, jammer goes down in any system they choose, TCF caps in, Tri dead. You do not have the cap fleet to contend with them on any level, and tbh you are fearful of losing yours which isnt a great start. For you to call them out, to get rid of their "meatshields", is just plainly ridiculous. ps. blah blahon ya KIA summation, we are very happy right now :) If it were so easy, why the hell havent they done it? Never mind the fact that dowing a jammer is a small part of a system takedown and the exit of reinforced time is what counts. Seriously you are so full of bullshit these days. I used to quite enjoy your posts but now you're a bigger CAOD joke than me. Enjoy the crown.
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.10 15:24:00 - [24] Originally by: KIAEddZ Originally by: Butter Dog sluuuurp sk mr tri ck tbh I've made posts which are anti-TRI recently (in their failed MM scam thread). Though I do like them (mostly because they make CAOD really entertaining). I'm just calling you out on bullshit where I see it. Your silly retort above pretty much convinces me you've lost the discussion.
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.10 15:46:00 - [25] Originally by: Sasha Lyre Yes, you're as perfectly neutral as me. Quite possibly, you are the worst poster thats ever posted on here. Your rhetoric, grammar and punctuation would lead us to believe you have had an education (of sorts), but your amoebic, one sided, cosmic string diatribe has rendered your character the laughing stock of this 'public discussion forum'... Making the alt army very angry is a sign of success, in my eyes
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.10 15:50:00 - [26] Originally by: Sasha Lyre At least eddz has the guts to post on his main, unlike you or me. Also, you can't really call 'bitter dog' a main anymore can you ? In all seriousness, where could he go in eve with that character, come one, someone tell me... Not everyone takes COAD so seriously they have to post with silly alts like you. For that reason, my corp have never had an issue getting offers from alliances. Thats probably because we're a pretty good little corp, and most people, as I've said, don't give two shits about this forum. But you wouldn't understand that. Hence posting behind an alt.
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.10 15:52:00 - [27] Originally by: Sasha Lyre We're not angry man, we think it's hilarious that you spend xx amount of dollars each month to type in here, lol Wheras you don't pay for your subscription?
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.10 15:53:00 - [28] Originally by: KIAEddZ Originally by: Butter Dog You're posting on a public dicusssion forum. If you don't want 'outsiders' commenting, keep it to a private forum. You have no legitimacy complaining about anyones contribution to any dicussion. Don't like it? Don't post. Discussion.. lol I am not complaining, you post as much as you like, just pointing out what a complete twt u r. You're right, it's not a discussion when you call someone a **** or tell them they are sucking someones c*ck. Just because you're incapable of an intelligent discussion, doesn't mean I'm not open to it.
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.10 15:57:00 - [29] Originally by: Sasha Lyre Name 1 alliance, just one who would take you in, after your performance on here, over the last few weeks.. Go on... We're not currently looking for an alliance AFAIK (though I'm not the leader of my corp, so you'd have to ask Algey). We're happy with the one we have. But thanks for your concern all the same
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.10 15:58:00 - [30] Originally by: KIAEddZ Originally by: Butter Dog You're right, it's not a discussion when you call someone a **** or tell them they are sucking someones c*ck. Truth is as truth does Butter, it cant be silenced forver, now go brush your teeth. I'm not even sure what that means...
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.10 16:06:00 - [31] Originally by: Sasha Lyre Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Sasha Lyre We're not angry man, we think it's hilarious that you spend xx amount of dollars each month to type in here, lol Wheras you don't pay for your subscription? I do pay for my subscription, like you, the difference is I don't have to log onto a character that thousands of people think is a cross between Forrest Gump and a ****roach.. Oh, you'd be suprised. I'm not as hated as you might like to think. The people I don't like, and post negatively about, yes, they hate me Being a well known NC alt, you definately fall into that category. But projecting your opinions onto others is generally not a good idea.
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.10.10 17:41:00 - [32] Originally by: Waagaa Ktlehr Edited by: Waagaa Ktlehr on 10/10/2008 17:34:15 Given that it is pretty funny seeing Butter Dog and KIAEddz trying to argue such a thing as "credibility", given both their track records... I'd say if I had to choose, given my own experience with both, I would always side with Butter Dog over Eddz. Mainly because Eddz is even more stubborn than Butter Dog, but he can not back it up with intelligence. You know I'm nice really, I'm just an annoying little **** on the forums

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.