EVE Search - [CMS Intervention REQUEST] Save the blasters

All Channels

Assembly Hall

[CMS Intervention REQUEST] Save the blasters

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Kyung Tsiung	Posted - 2008.10.30 16:23:00 - [31] supporting this thread for all galentean pilots out there
Aurelio Baran Caldari	Posted - 2008.10.31 04:32:00 - [32] This thread. I support. ---
Dizeezer Velar Caldari League of Disgruntled Fast Food Employees	Posted - 2008.10.31 20:55:00 - [33] Edited by: Dizeezer Velar on 31/10/2008 20:55:23 Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=905797 What do you guys think about this testing? How should battleships be able to handle smaller ships, and to what extent? I love it the way it is right now! (on tranq not sisi)
Danton Marcellus Nebula Rasa Holdings	Posted - 2008.10.31 22:06:00 - [34] I'd hate for it to get all sniping cowards. Should/would/could have, HAVE you chav! Also Known As
redtalonn 42 Inc	Posted - 2008.11.01 14:06:00 - [35] -redtalonn
Ankhesentapemkah Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2008.11.02 16:37:00 - [36] I'm affraid this just got voted down 2-7 with just me and Inanna Zuni in favor. The CSM believes that CCPs balancing department will catch this issue before it goes live, and that it is not constructive to nag them when balance changes are still being made. --- NEW MOVIE! CSM Campaign Thread
Malcanis RuffRyders Eradication Alliance	Posted - 2008.11.02 17:45:00 - [37] Supported. Blasters shouldn't become as horribly useless for PvP as missile were for a long time.
Malcanis RuffRyders Eradication Alliance	Posted - 2008.11.02 17:46:00 - [38] Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah I'm affraid this just got voted down 2-7 with just me and Inanna Zuni in favor. The CSM believes that CCPs balancing department will catch this issue before it goes live, and that it is not constructive to nag them when balance changes are still being made. I admire the CSM's sunny optimism.
Ankhesentapemkah Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2008.11.02 19:11:00 - [39] Originally by: Malcanis I admire the CSM's sunny optimism. I suppose I could relay the concerns unofficially while I'm at the fanfest, at least that would be something. --- NEW MOVIE! CSM Campaign Thread
Chi Quan Perkone	Posted - 2008.11.03 20:29:00 - [40] blasters still need their tracking looked into, come on. ---- You don't have to like it - I don't blame you for not liking it.
Arithron Gallente Gallente Trade Alliance	Posted - 2008.11.03 23:04:00 - [41] Originally by: MalcanisI admire the CSM's sunny optimism. Quote: I suppose I could relay the concerns unofficially while I'm at the fanfest, at least that would be something. Do you stand by the decisions of the CSM at all, or is this statement and quick post to show you voted for the blasters (with no real explanation of why it was voted down) for election purposes? In my book, a CSM should have a united front; picking out issues for personal kudos is unprofessional IMO. The position of the majority of the CSM was that CCP statements (esp. in light of Zulupark's epic replies) combined with the thread of concerns by players (being actively read by devs), in addition to the live dev blog statements, meant that this issue was already being actively dealt with by CCP. Additionally, these changes are not yet live in game, but being changed on Sisi with some regularity! Take care, Arithron Vote Arithron for CSM! Check out my thread: http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=899358
LOL56	Posted - 2008.11.04 04:15:00 - [42] this is for for all my friends who fly blaster ships.
Kazuiman	Posted - 2008.11.13 04:13:00 - [43] Edited by: Kazuiman on 13/11/2008 04:13:33 I agree, I have finally gotten to use t2 blasters and this nerf has been devastating. i feel like i'm in a game of tug and pull where CCP leads you to go this way with skill training then switches the game up suddenly on ya.. i dont know a whole lot of the math involved but i do know that CCP should take a look into their very own customers concern about the product they purchase from CCP - and the comments i have heard from ccp regarding it are dissapoiting, especially coming from them! I sure hope they got looked at because this is very frustrating I now dont have a super 1337 ship..
HeIIfire11	Posted - 2008.11.13 10:46:00 - [44] Edited by: HeIIfire11 on 13/11/2008 10:47:44 I myself am a huge fan of the megathron hull..infact,its the only ship I like...and ive been working on it since I saw it. Im not a gallente..but if ccp lets blasters die..they let gallente die. On top of that..the vindicators bonus to large dps is useless if you have bs lvl 5...now,with the new mwd stats..any mega can have all the same bonus of my bill isk ship for 60-80 mill. This thread. I support.
eliminator2 Fatality. Heretic Nation	Posted - 2008.11.13 11:12:00 - [45] we need blasters boosted we got the speed boost (a very very small one) but that isnt enough i think eve was fine with the nano stuff and how missiles and blasters and everything else were i have adapted to it though by training amarr but 2 years 5 months of training gallente down the drain tbh and soon amarr will be kicked in teeth
Gaelenus Society of the Crimson Flame	Posted - 2008.11.13 16:46:00 - [46] fully supporting this
Bellum Eternus Gallente Death of Virtue	Posted - 2008.11.13 17:34:00 - [47] Originally by: Malcanis Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah I'm affraid this just got voted down 2-7 with just me and Inanna Zuni in favor. The CSM believes that CCPs balancing department will catch this issue before it goes live, and that it is not constructive to nag them when balance changes are still being made. I admire the CSM's sunny optimism. I don't. What is on TQ now, with QR, shows just how incompetent the CSM is in judging CCP's capacity to **** things up. Bellum Eternus Inveniam viam aut faciam. Originally by: Horza Otho [06:36:47] Horza Otho > its all good, everytime i fit a mega i play some mariah carey in the backround
Musashibou Benkei Combined Imperial Fleet	Posted - 2008.11.13 17:38:00 - [48] I'm a torp man myself but I still support this thread completely. We, the missile users, got hit very hard with this new patch (notice how everyone's saying patch and not expansion? hint, hint, nudge, nudge to CCP). But I must say that the insane nerf-batting that gallente ships have received is also unfair. Thumbs up
Anig Browl	Posted - 2008.11.14 01:38:00 - [49] Edited by: Anig Browl on 14/11/2008 01:38:44 Originally by: Liang Nuren Nerfing battleship mass/acceleration/velocity and the web nerf was just out of left field though. Point. The nano nerf was supposed to eliminate large-ish ships going at insane speeds. I had no strong opinion, but I could see the point, cruisers at 8000m/s was sort of wacky. Haven't flown with blasters for a long time, but finding my battleship crawling along at 112m/s yesterday wasn't fun, especially not on top of all the other changes. As for the web nerf, it might make sense if it was related to mass or so, but you can still web a battleship or whatever with a frigate which I have always thought was stupid.
Mister Xerox	Posted - 2008.11.14 06:18:00 - [50] As little as I use blasters, I am forced to support this thread simply because of the changes that now make blasters a dangerously impractical system (i.e. Web changes). Scramblers need to be extended in range and strength if they're expected to be used at all. Currently all a MWD ship has to do is the same thing they've always done: Run to the edge of disruptor range and orbit. Current changes = no change at all. Everything does just as it has always done in the past, just at a slower speed.
Suitonia interimo	Posted - 2008.11.16 00:58:00 - [51] Still an issue.
Sparrowhawk Cooper	Posted - 2008.11.16 09:24:00 - [52] I concur.
Dariah Stardweller	Posted - 2008.11.17 10:38:00 - [53] Blasters need to get some lovin after this patch, agreed.
Zhula Guixgrixks Increasing Success by Lowering Expectations Vanguard.	Posted - 2008.11.20 12:37:00 - [54] Edited by: Zhula Guixgrixks on 20/11/2008 12:40:09 I'm flying a blaster Taranis. I can assure, blasters doing fine in QR. All BS-pwnmobile guys, just socialize a litte bit, having friends is a GOOD thing.

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.