| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Holy Lowlander
Comply Or Die
G00DFELLAS
   |
Posted - 2008.11.08 20:41:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Holy Lowlander on 08/11/2008 20:46:29
over 1500 votes against the nano nerf , 70 page post
How can something like this go trough ... ?
This post got the most votes ever in a CSM post and *greatly* outnumbers the amount of whines about the 'overpowered' nano's .
This is not a whine about the nano nerf , this is a whine about ccp not listening to their customers at all.
All those people have a clear opinion about something , but still the changes are made.
cleary ccp did listen to players on some rare ocasions and the csm did acomplish some things. But how can this just be so ignored....
|
Holy Lowlander
Comply Or Die
G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 20:46:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Miss CJB
because the nano nerf is a good thing?
I can think of 1500 people who dissagree ;)
|
Holy Lowlander
Comply Or Die
G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.11.10 06:36:00 -
[3]
CCP fixed a problem allmoast non existant. Their main argument was the ridicusly high speed one could reach. But to get your vagabond to wtfomg speeds you need to spend about 5-8 billion on it ..... and it will still get fried by a rapier + zealot.
And now they *fixed* that . You need that 8 billion to get a speed that was now about normal.
Siriously the only benifit nano had was that you could pick your fights so you where not forced to fight that 60 man gang that formed up to get you. Now speeds are going down like this ... Nano isn't viable anymore ... not because combat changed that much .. but because that 60 man blob is going to get you bubbled / scrammed/ webbed and fried ..,...
Wich comes to the next thing : Blobbing-online
wich will let alot of nanoers go and afk cloaking-*** in force recons in 0.0 station systems .. until the blobbers whine about that ofc...
|
Holy Lowlander
Comply Or Die
G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.11.10 19:09:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Dizeezer Velar
Originally by: Crackzilla
Originally by: Dizeezer Velar
I don't get all the love for small ships, I can see n00bs being happy about it because it doesn't take much dedicated training. Personally, i think a big badass battleship is much cooler.
The issue was that Eve had devolved so all you needed were nanos for roaming and battleships for large ops.
Dedicated training is for specializing in a specific role. Instead we had required training for general purpose nanos and battleships.
Originally by: Dizeezer Velar
Who the **** is going to use a 7.5km scram in a small gatecamp?
The 9km t2 scram is likely to be used in replacement of a web. So 24km disrupter + 9km scram. A few ceptors placed evenly around a 0.0 gate camp. Now you've got something.
Cool, now i just have to buy 3-5 accounts to do something i used to be able to do solo :)
you forgot the scouts and spying alts tbh.
|
| |
|