EVE Search - T3 ships quick question

All Channels

Ships and Modules

T3 ships quick question

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Rivur'Tam X10 Punishment	Posted - 2008.11.14 05:50:00 - [1] Ok so t3 is coming in march... will there be new hulls that you can customize OR will it just be modules that customize the hulls we already have ??????? .. I like teh secs and teh boobies
Lady Aja Caldari Ore Mongers Black Hand.	Posted - 2008.11.14 06:11:00 - [2] Originally by: Rivur'Tam Ok so t3 is coming in march... will there be new hulls that you can customize OR will it just be modules that customize the hulls we already have ??????? 5 sections to each ship. 5x5x5x5x5=3125 combonations giving different aspects to each race... not sure if that will be 3125 combotions per class of ship or not. but certianly 3125 per race at least... Many kudos to Foulque for my sig..
Dr Sheepbringer Gallente	Posted - 2008.11.14 06:18:00 - [3] Has it been confirmed that you can use ANy type of combo? for example: Hull module 5 and Armor Module 5 would mean that you couldn't use Speedmod 5, only Speedmod 1. Stop whining.
Rivur'Tam X10 Punishment	Posted - 2008.11.14 06:24:00 - [4] WOW!! Thats really going to give some serious options. I hope i will be able to make up some good looking ships with it. I really wish i could do somthing with the forehead of that domi, the rest of the ship is great but that dome LOL .. I like teh secs and teh boobies
Elhina Novae Sky's Edge	Posted - 2008.11.14 06:31:00 - [5] I am very excited... in the wrong way. I want to see CCP managing to Balance this oh boy ------------ Originally by: Boz Well Originally by: SurrenderMonkey ... There's an Amarr problem? Nothing that can't be solved by more Minmatar nerfs.
BiggestT Caldari Space Oddysey Pupule 'Ohana	Posted - 2008.11.14 06:34:00 - [6] Originally by: Elhina Novae I am very excited... in the wrong way. I want to see CCP managing to Balance this oh boy Hmm, are you sure they are mixing the hulls for new looks or is it just mixing the bonus's/attributes? EVE history Missiles post-nerf
Ekil Ix Omega Wing R.E.P.O.	Posted - 2008.11.14 09:12:00 - [7] Originally by: BiggestT Originally by: Elhina Novae I am very excited... in the wrong way. I want to see CCP managing to Balance this oh boy Hmm, are you sure they are mixing the hulls for new looks or is it just mixing the bonus's/attributes?
Mashie Saldana Sharks With Frickin' Laser Beams	Posted - 2008.11.14 09:18:00 - [8] Each hull section brings it's own slots/stats to the mix.
Lady Aja Caldari Ore Mongers Black Hand.	Posted - 2008.11.14 09:27:00 - [9] Originally by: Mashie Saldana Each hull section brings it's own slots/stats to the mix. I see some seriously nasty combos comming up.. and i may retrain to suit... depends really but i am happy being amarr specced for now Many kudos to Foulque for my sig..
HanRolo	Posted - 2008.11.14 09:33:00 - [10] is their a FAQ etc for this?
JS LiamElms Gallente Quantum Industries RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.11.14 10:09:00 - [11] from what i have heard... they wont be more powerful in anyway to t2. they will prob be same strength or even less than some of the t2 available at the moment. prob wont get t2 bonuses, and probably the bonuses will be geared towards fitting the modules together. To expand on this, i expect that your hull choice will give bonuses on been able to fit certain module element combination, while preventing you from fitting others. So you prob wont get the t2 ship bonuses, making them most likly less powerful than t2. But due to your ability to set up for one single highly directed job make them very interesting and good to use in 'gang' situations. from what i gather the main idea is customisable, which probably means you can arrange the bonus mods, the highs/lows, power/cpu etc. Which could potentially give us some highly spec'd ships with full 8 rack of large t2 blaster neutron set ups.... however paper thin prob due to having all the modules primairaly used for for the guns. a specilised jammer could prob be setup for 8 mids and no highs, or well atleast 1 for the cloak... however you might find it still dosen't have the full bonuses a falcon gets.... I forsee a tank set up... picking a hull that has high powergrid, adding modules to increase the lows and powergrid... using stupid amounts of 1600mm tungstons on it, jump it in and tank!!
Eldereye	Posted - 2008.11.14 11:41:00 - [12] Anyone know what size these ships are supposed to be? Frig, cruiser, BS?
Zaknussem Caldari Intrum Industria	Posted - 2008.11.14 11:47:00 - [13] The more I think about T3 ships, the more I am certain that the 3125 number is pulled out of thin air by marketing for the wow factor. Each module corresponds to a certain part of the ship, right? Front-, mid- and aftsections, you get the idea. Well, can you build a ship out of pure midsections? Most likely not. That limits the options considerably, as you can only make your choices on one axis of the "chart", not two. By my math (which I do not guarantee in any way to be correct) I can only see 425 possible ship configurations. It's still alot, but it's barely 1/8 of the claimed amount of versatility. Could someone help me verify this?
Jovienus	Posted - 2008.11.14 11:48:00 - [14] T3 ships and modules, would be glad to see modules that are more affordable to high skilled players that aren't faction based. At the minute most faction modules can be fitted by low skill players to offset players using t2 modules with high skills. I think this is somewhat odd considering that t2 is meant to be the bee's knees. Think of the different between t2 cruise missile launchers and ammo with say a caldari faction cruise launcher and faction missiles. The faction variation does massive amounts of damage for less penalties. Before the patch I was seriously considering not bothering with 2 lauchers and missiles for the faction versions instead. But for t2 versions to shine you need massive number of skills, where in the faction version requires very little skills to fit and use effectively. After all specialisation skills don't always affect faction modules and ammo. Just my view on the subject.
Blake Zacary Volatile Nature STYX.	Posted - 2008.11.14 11:49:00 - [15] http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=k-DPqnifEIg found this from Fanfest.
Furb Killer Gallente The Scope	Posted - 2008.11.14 12:03:00 - [16] Originally by: Zaknussem The more I think about T3 ships, the more I am certain that the 3125 number is pulled out of thin air by marketing for the wow factor. Each module corresponds to a certain part of the ship, right? Front-, mid- and aftsections, you get the idea. Well, can you build a ship out of pure midsections? Most likely not. That limits the options considerably, as you can only make your choices on one axis of the "chart", not two. By my math (which I do not guarantee in any way to be correct) I can only see 425 possible ship configurations. It's still alot, but it's barely 1/8 of the claimed amount of versatility. Could someone help me verify this? You got 5 different front sections, 5 different mid sections, 5 different aft sections and 5 different sections somewhere in between and another 5 different sections somewhere in between. So it is correct.
Mephistophilis Domination. Sc0rched Earth	Posted - 2008.11.14 12:29:00 - [17] Er... did i miss something? Was this mentioned at fanfest or is there info available?
Oliver G G Enterprises	Posted - 2008.11.14 13:17:00 - [18] Yeah seems like i have missed this info too. Can someone pls give us some enlightenment on where you got your infos on the tech3 and customizations please? Oliver G, Founder and CEO of G Enterprises.
Jacob Holland Gallente Weyland-Vulcan Industries	Posted - 2008.11.14 13:20:00 - [19] Originally by: Zaknussem The more I think about T3 ships, the more I am certain that the 3125 number is pulled out of thin air by marketing for the wow factor. Each module corresponds to a certain part of the ship, right? Front-, mid- and aftsections, you get the idea. Well, can you build a ship out of pure midsections? Most likely not. That limits the options considerably, as you can only make your choices on one axis of the "chart", not two. By my math (which I do not guarantee in any way to be correct) I can only see 425 possible ship configurations. It's still alot, but it's barely 1/8 of the claimed amount of versatility. Could someone help me verify this? For each front section you can fit 5 possible midsections, front section 1 + midsection 1, front section 1 + midsection 2...etc. So for the first pair of sections you have the choice of five midsections per frontsection, 5 x 5 = 25 = 5¦ For the engines you have five options per midsection option in the same way and therefore (5 x 5) x 5 = 125 = 5¦ For each component type available the power increases, with five available the possible combinations are ((((5 x 5) x 5) x 5) x 5) = 5^5 = 3125. -- Originally by: cordy Respect to IAC .Your one of the few people who truly deserve to own and live in the space you are in.
Judas Jung	Posted - 2008.11.14 14:00:00 - [20] Video on YouTube from FanFest
RedSplat Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service	Posted - 2008.11.14 14:35:00 - [21] I get to create a ship that suits my playstyle? FEAR MY SALVAGERS OF DESTRUCTION

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.