| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Gantor Tesla
   |
Posted - 2008.12.05 14:44:00 -
[1]
A few ideas. All of them revolve around sub capital siege module use.
Field Combat: (I have two ideas here)
Spec A
Per (Race) BS lvl: (Tier 1 BS Bonus)
Per T2t3BS lvl: -20% to Siege Module Max velocity penalty; +5% (Race Bonus)
Role Bonus: Ability to fit Siege Mod
Spec B
Per (Race) BS lvl: (Tier 1 BS Bonus)
Per T2t3BS lvl: -15% Siege Module Activation time/fuel consumption
Role Bonus: Ability to fit Siege Mod; -50% Siege Mod Velocity Penalty
Field Logistics
Spec A
Per (Race) BS lvl: (Tier 1 BS Bonus)
Per T2t3BS lvl: -20% to Triage Module Max velocity penalty; -10% Remote(Shield/Armor) Rep Cap usage
Role Bonus: Ability to fit Triage Mod; 500% Bonus to remote (shield/armor) repair range
Spec B
Per (Race) BS lvl: (Tier 1 BS Bonus)
Per T2t3BS lvl: -15% Siege Module Activation time/fuel consumption; .5 additional links (3 at lvl 4)
Role Bonus: Ability to fit Triage Mod; -50% Siege Mod Velocity Penalty; Can fit Warfare Links
All ships would need a dedicated Strontium bay or a role bonus for consumption. Adjustments would probably be needed for some of the t1 BS bonuses, but this is a rough draft. Please feel free to post other suggestions / tweaks, this is a discussion.
|
Dhejay Centrix
Caldari
The Wailing Doom
|
Posted - 2008.12.05 15:36:00 -
[2]
Actually I think the idea of a t2 variant of the tier 3 BS would be excellent. Not sure about siege mods on them though as I think balancing them would be impossible.
The question is what would it be for? I think logistics should remain a function of just the logistics cruisers otherwise the incentive to use them would vanish, the blackops are there already and the marauders are great for missioning so what role would this leave for the new class of ship? Surely this escalation of hostilities between the empires should have resulted in them constructing new classes of BS to fight each other? Care would have to be taken to ensure that we are not just given battleship size HACs which would be very very bad for EvE.
|
Gantor Tesla
|
Posted - 2008.12.05 15:53:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Dhejay Centrix
Actually I think the idea of a t2 variant of the tier 3 BS would be excellent. Not sure about siege mods on them though as I think balancing them would be impossible.
The question is what would it be for? I think logistics should remain a function of just the logistics cruisers otherwise the incentive to use them would vanish, the blackops are there already and the marauders are great for missioning so what role would this leave for the new class of ship? Surely this escalation of hostilities between the empires should have resulted in them constructing new classes of BS to fight each other? Care would have to be taken to ensure that we are not just given battleship size HACs which would be very very bad for EvE.
Well Logistics Modules did not make carriers replace the Basilisk. WHy? Mobility / cost to field. a T2 BS (prob heavier and slower than the already lethargic BS themselves) is never going to do hit and run like the logistics cruisers can. Furthermore, it's self webbing / scramming so you have to dedicate yourself to a fight to get the module bonuses. Not to mention the 35 mil cost for JUST module.
|
Dhejay Centrix
Caldari
The Wailing Doom
|
Posted - 2008.12.05 15:55:00 -
[4]
no the carriers didn't replace the basilisk because one is a carrier and one is a logistics cruiser.
|
Joe Starbreaker
Starbreaker Frigateers
Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
|
Posted - 2008.12.05 16:27:00 -
[5]
I just want a Khanid battleship that shoots torpedoes. I don't care what its role is. Maybe create a new class of ships called wtfbbqpwnmobiles?
.............
Now recruiting like-minded pilots. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |