Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
vault22dweler
Gallente 8lack Wing Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 17:53:00 -
[1]
Alright I have seen many of the other POS topics floating around in the Assembly Hall Thread and see most of them floating away in to obscurity. So I am Making this thread to Share my ideas as well as incorporate others that I have seen.
Also with the uncovering of the reaction array exploit I think now would be a great time for CCP to take a good hard look at the POS system.
First of A great idea and post that already has a lot of support is Evelgrivion "Flogging The Dead Horse" He has some great Ideas and thread can be found Here
-Changes I would like to see- The ability to open containers in a corp hanger array Be able to repackage items in corp hanger array The POS Anchoring Queue (The ability to place all the structures for a POS and have them anchor one at a time(as it is already) without you having to be there) Do something about off lined POS's Alliance Hanger's / Ship Maintenance arrays The introduction of T2 POS modules Such as the T2 moon mining array (especially in the aftermath of the exploit bit) Medical Bay'sish ( This is one that would be nice but if it were implemented would have to have major drawbacks to control the kinda of advantage something like it would bring)
Alright well thats about all I have and If any or all of them were implemented it would make the Hell of running/Using a POS as your Home Much easier. Which in turn may make it so more corporation and alliance's look towards living in deep Low Sec and 0.0 as an option than it is currently.
So If you Find that you Like some of these Ideas and want CCP to DO SOMETHING about the current state of POS's Please support this thread. (seems like we need many pages in order to get noticed enough for them to even start considering stuff).
!LETS GET THIS ON THE NEXT MAJOR PATCH!
|
DEATHsyphon
8lack Wing Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 17:57:00 -
[2]
Supported m8 -------------------- I'm not not going to pod you! |
Illwill Bill
Svea Rike
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 17:58:00 -
[3]
POS clone vat? Hell yeah!
|
Drekmakriduv
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 18:01:00 -
[4]
- More detailed, or user programmable access control inside of Corporate arrays. The current structure is tied to a corporate structure, thus is very limited.
All other points above!! Agreed!
|
Marn Darniq
8lack Wing Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 18:02:00 -
[5]
Agreed. Would make our lives a lot easier!
|
Psyco Groupie
Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 18:03:00 -
[6]
AMEN! Great points Vault22
|
Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 18:09:00 -
[7]
yes, let's devalue outposts even more ---
Zombie Apocalypse Guitar-Wielding Superteam |
vault22dweler
8lack Wing Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 18:18:00 -
[8]
Edited by: vault22dweler on 12/12/2008 18:20:18
Originally by: Alekseyev Karrde yes, let's devalue outposts even more
The only Point that was made that could have a major affect on the value of outposts would be the medical bay module. Hence the whole if it was implemented would have to have major drawbacks to it. Example: Limited capacity, Being that it is a medical facility it would need lots of Power and CPU , but if implemented would like it to be a .3 Security rated system to 0.0 ( maybe even only to NPC 0.0) making it so controllable space would require an outpost to do such a thing, and again giving an incentive for corporations and alliances to move out of high sec without having to join a major power block.
The rest of them are more or less ease of use issues that have been around for a long time and that for those of us who dont have Sov space.
|
Davy Johnes
Caldari 8lack Wing Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 19:18:00 -
[9]
You have my full support =) << BLACK WING >> |
Janu Hull
Terra Incognita Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 19:40:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Alekseyev Karrde yes, let's devalue outposts even more
Outposts are already hideously overrated. I'll take a nice quiet, extremely well defended, POS any day of the week. In the event of an emergency, my ego may be used as a floatation device.
|
|
Brur
8lack Wing Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 19:50:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Brur on 12/12/2008 19:53:48 vault is gay, rational argument #1 and #2 and such and such and such and such and in samation i am right and by association vault is right as well making him less gay. so i guess i support this post after some divisive exchange. ------------- Techzer0 is my hero |
Marrkel
The Scope
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 19:54:00 -
[12]
SUPPORTED, CCP needs to take a good hard look at POS's
|
Stonie Bandit
8lack Wing
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 21:52:00 -
[13]
/signed without reading.
=====
* Your signature is too large. Please note: we do not allow signature files larger than 400x120 - Fallout |
Rob Vicious
|
Posted - 2008.12.13 02:54:00 -
[14]
Edited by: Rob Vicious on 13/12/2008 02:54:06
Quote: vault is gay, rational argument #1 and #2 and such and such and such and such and in samation i am right and by association vault is right as well making him less gay. so i guess i support this post after some divisive exchange.
Brur your the best diplomat ever :P seriously
AAAANNDD supported
|
Abio Genesis
|
Posted - 2008.12.13 02:55:00 -
[15]
Who are you people? Where am I? How in Eve do I get back?
|
Known Miner
|
Posted - 2008.12.13 02:58:00 -
[16]
I agree CCP should DO SOMETHING about the current state of POS's. |
BIGBRUMMIE
|
Posted - 2008.12.13 12:15:00 -
[17]
Good post, good suggestions
|
Pliauga
Federal Defence Union
|
Posted - 2008.12.13 13:43:00 -
[18]
Supporting this not because I like some of the particular ideas but because I agree that the POS system needs a capital rethink.
---------- DRONE love rulez!! 'mkay?! . |
Raven Krow
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 02:47:00 -
[19]
SUPPORTED
|
Rasai
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 03:23:00 -
[20]
POS's have needed to be actually fixed for a while Avalable Highsec research slots |
|
Syberbolt8
Gen Tec
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 05:40:00 -
[21]
/signed, the dead horse needs to rise again, and CCP need to reconsider it.
Pos queue needs to happen for setup, its a pain.
CSM needs to try these ones again, new CSM means another chance, lets get some support here please... Join Gen Tec |
evilphoenix
Beyond Divinity Inc
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 23:38:00 -
[22]
Some good ideas. --------
|
Jareck Hunter
Academy of Decadence Hereticus Aegis Communis
|
Posted - 2008.12.15 06:12:00 -
[23]
nothing to add, supported. ------------------------------------------------- Sorry for my bad english^^
Join public Channel "Decadence" or visit www.eve-decadence.de |
Gotrek65
Brimstone Order CryoGenesis Mining Syndicate
|
Posted - 2008.12.15 07:16:00 -
[24]
I support all but the medical bay would need some tweaking, like you can spawn there but you can't update your clone. or use it like a clone vat bay
|
Myra Rodan
Minmatar Es and Whizz Hedonistic Imperative
|
Posted - 2008.12.15 15:34:00 -
[25]
Edited by: Myra Rodan on 15/12/2008 15:34:34 EDIT: spacing
I agree, POSs need some lovin.
Definately agree with allowing containers and repackaging at corp hanger arrays.
Kinda meh on the anchoring queue. It always seemed to me that having someone to supervise was the point, even though you don't need to remain there after starting the process.
I like the unanchoring idea, though my favorite suggestion is Chribba's: Make a skill that works like salvaging that can be used on offline POSs.
The T2 moon mining array sounds like a good idea, but I don't know how to make it work well. If it can mine double from even an abundance 1 resource sounds broken to me, and all other mining truncates fractions so it couldn't just output 2 units every 5 hours or something.
I would like to see a medical bay, but as stated in this thread that would seriously impact on one of the important functions of outposts. Though I guess that allowing repackaging does too somewhat.
But overall, POSs need attention, and this looks like a good start to me.
Selling and delivering boosters anywhere in Eve. |
Cyd Vicious
8lack Wing Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.12.16 15:11:00 -
[26]
Yes, medical bay in POS would be awesome ^^ |
Victor Achur
|
Posted - 2008.12.16 16:55:00 -
[27]
/Signed big time
|
Smougg
|
Posted - 2008.12.16 16:57:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Victor Achur /Signed big time
Wrong char
/signed :P
|
Miss Xerox
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 00:45:00 -
[29]
Yes, they definately need to look at POS logistics.
I just abandoned a faction medium and 40 faction modules because I simply don't have 5 hours to unanchor everything one at a time.
IMO modules should be unanchorable en-masse and not take 10 minutes per single module. Or you should be able to unanchor the damn tower and just move it, and then unanchor all the other stuff at your liesure (at the current 60-seconds per item).
POS mechanics is just plain broken entirely.
|
galphi
Unitary Senate Unitary Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 05:26:00 -
[30]
The POS system is looking dated and needs some love. Definitely supported !
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |