| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
757
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 16:49:00 -
[31] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:I think the OP has a good point about one-man minimum-skill alts taking up corp names. Their post wasn't about actual old corps, just one-man non-corps. Telling them to 'be more creative' to get around the issue doesn't make it any less of an issue. It's the same complaint that occurs about domain name squatting. What if you wanted to start a website for your deluxe peanut shop family business called Peanut House, but found that peanuthouse.com is taken by someone who is not even using it?
That person had the idea to get the domain name first, and paid money to do so, just as the guy in that one-man corp you're hating on did. In fact, the guy in the one-man corp likely paid more for his corp name legacy than the domain name squatter paid for the same amount of time holding peanuthouse.com. Why can anyone feel entitled to a corp name enough to boot someone else who paid for the same corp name?
Plus, just because it's a one-man corp and has been so since 2006 doesn't mean that the account is inactive, or even that the character is inactive.
That's why the solution is: be more creative. Rifterlings - Small gang lowsec combat corp specializing in frigates and cruisers (all races, not just Rifters!). US Timezone veterans and newbies alike are welcome to join. Come chat in the "we fly rifters" in-game channel. Free fitted frigates for members! |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
757
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 16:50:00 -
[32] - Quote
Asuka Solo wrote:Isha Aylet wrote:Put a . after it? Or put a . in front of it? Surround it with xX and Xx. If that doesn't work, try .xX and Xx. Rifterlings - Small gang lowsec combat corp specializing in frigates and cruisers (all races, not just Rifters!). US Timezone veterans and newbies alike are welcome to join. Come chat in the "we fly rifters" in-game channel. Free fitted frigates for members! |

Benny Ohu
The Lazy Dragoons True Apathy
49
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 16:56:00 -
[33] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:It's the same complaint that occurs about domain name squatting. What if you wanted to start a website for your deluxe peanut shop family business called Peanut House, but found that peanuthouse.com is taken by someone who is not even using it?
That person had the idea to get the domain name first, and paid money to do so, just as the guy in that one-man corp you're hating on did. In fact, the guy in the one-man corp likely paid more for his corp name legacy than the domain name squatter paid for the same amount of time holding peanuthouse.com. Why can anyone feel entitled to a corp name enough to boot someone else who paid for the same corp name?
That's true, and if making people buy corps from you for the name was a thing, I'd like it. If there was a game around it, if there was a reason in EVE to sit on a corp name... but there isn't :(
I mean, I hear you're allowed to continually bump a freighter if you have an actual reason for doing so. (Don't take my word on that, it's normally considered grief play)
I don't think corp names that belonged to actual corps that had members should be claimable, though. Those are a part of EVE history. |

Flaming Head
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 16:58:00 -
[34] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Flaming Head wrote:No actually, if I came back to eve after 5 years of not playing and found myself in a noob corp and someone else had my original corp name I would think 'fair enough', as I would imagine most rational people would.
I would say that perhaps the word 'played' is key here to describe someone who hasn't logged in for 5 years...you are likely uppity about the idea because you continue to play and assign social value to the name of your corp rather and those it, something that someone who comes back to Eve after 5 years is unlikely to do I should imagine given that there would be no one left in the corp in the situations I have described...).
If taking away a name from a legitimate player is such an issue, a simple fix would be to parse the database for corporations held by alts with no skillpoint development at all on accounts that have been inactive for >5 years. A number of legitimate players holding a corp in this way to be affected would be so miniscule to not merit mentioning compared with the number of forgotten faceless alts of people who tried eve, created a corp and decided not to bother. All this, so you can think of a name? You want them to datamine all the dead corps in Eve for you? Princess much?
No, I want to datamine all the dead corps in Eve for other people wanting to start a corp. I already have a suitable corp name now after placing some punctuation half way through the name I originally wanted which was a pretty obscure mix of pretty random words and something quite personal to me. To be honest I was VERY surprised it was taken.
I did not expect this much hostility towards an idea designed to clean up the database, and free up some names for the new spunk coming into the game. Fair enough taking names from established players on a 3 year 'break' might be out of the question, but shutting down 'corporations' held by completely undeveloped alts on 5 year inactive accounts?
Something like this could probably be quite easily be coded into a script/parser with some kind IF/THEN function to delete entries with perameters surrounding '>5 year account inactivity' and 'character development = 0' (I don't pretend to be a programmer so mock me if needs be but I'm sure CCP's data trackers have perameters like these that could be taken advantage of). I'm sure some kind of database failsafe already exists to dump characters into their original noob corps if a bug causes them to become corpless.
Meh, I've said my piece which is what these forums are for at the end of the day. I'll leave the thread to burn in the flames. |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
306
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 16:58:00 -
[35] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:It's the same complaint that occurs about domain name squatting. What if you wanted to start a website for your deluxe peanut shop family business called Peanut House, but found that peanuthouse.com is taken by someone who is not even using it?
That person had the idea to get the domain name first, and paid money to do so, just as the guy in that one-man corp you're hating on did. In fact, the guy in the one-man corp likely paid more for his corp name legacy than the domain name squatter paid for the same amount of time holding peanuthouse.com. Why can anyone feel entitled to a corp name enough to boot someone else who paid for the same corp name? That's true, and if making people buy corps from you for the name was a thing, I'd like it. If there was a game around it, if there was a reason in EVE to sit on a corp name... but there isn't :( I mean, I hear you're allowed to continually bump a freighter if you have an actual reason for doing so. (Don't take my word on that, it's normally considered grief play) I don't think corp names that belonged to actual corps that had members should be claimable, though. Those are a part of EVE history. All corps have at least one member. Fun fact, they're all also part of Eve history, for the same reason.
And you can sell corpnames. Where does it say that you cannot? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
758
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 16:59:00 -
[36] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:That's true, and if making people buy corps from you for the name was a thing, I'd like it. If there was a game around it, if there was a reason in EVE to sit on a corp name... but there isn't :( Sounds like an untapped niche. Why are you here whining about it instead of out there selling corp names?
Benny Ohu wrote: I mean, I hear you're allowed to continually bump a freighter if you have an actual reason for doing so. (Don't take my word on that, it's normally considered grief play)
I think "amusement" is considered an "actual reason". Rifterlings - Small gang lowsec combat corp specializing in frigates and cruisers (all races, not just Rifters!). US Timezone veterans and newbies alike are welcome to join. Come chat in the "we fly rifters" in-game channel. Free fitted frigates for members! |

Vetorept Fera
Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
28
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:00:00 -
[37] - Quote
MeestaPenni wrote:Look around...
"Mouse Melon Jesus Socks" will fit in quite well.
I think you should go with: Mouse Melon Jesus Socks DOT In pace requiescat |

Elena Melkan
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
15
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:09:00 -
[38] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:I think the OP has a good point about one-man minimum-skill alts taking up corp names. Their post wasn't about actual old corps, just one-man non-corps. Telling them to 'be more creative' to get around the issue doesn't make it any less of an issue. It is definitely annoying for a person who desperately wants a certain special name for their corp to see that the name has been taken by some unknown alt. Fastest ones get the best names. We could perhaps compare this, maybe not perfectly accurately but still, to internet companies reserving certain wanted domain names. Those, who want the domains badly, will buy them. Or well, those who can afford to.
Darn, maybe one could make ISK with reserving and selling corp names as well?
|

Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
50
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:10:00 -
[39] - Quote
Flaming Head wrote:So...the time has come to make a corp!
Name choosing...name choosing...name choosing. Oh...every name I think up appears to be taken by a one man corp whose CEO is a faceless placeholder alt sitting on a forgotten and long deactivated account!
Is there no way CCP can do some kind of corp purge and reset the names of corporations that have only 1 character on a deactivated account and haven't been touched for >5 years or something? (I'd say 2 or 3 years personally but those people 'might' come back to their no face alts with 5,000sp and 5,000ISK I suppose....../sarcasm).
I think it's safe to say that if someone hasn't logged in for 3/4/5 years and has no corp members left/was using an alt to keep a corp name 'safe', they aren't going to miss said corp even if they ever do resub (unlikely) and if they do miss it, so what they haven't been playing for 5 years???.
/dons flame retardant / tin foil hat / conspiracy cape / deceit diaper / troll t-shirt / pubbie pettiecoat / etc... Really interested in knowing what names you were going for and are taken. Will really help with the answers you are getting :)#
|

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
537
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:15:00 -
[40] - Quote
Try out - Mitten Kitten Tigers in Red Pyjamas - I think its still free. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Micheal Dietrich
Standards and Practices
239
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:18:00 -
[41] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:It's the same complaint that occurs about domain name squatting. What if you wanted to start a website for your deluxe peanut shop family business called Peanut House, but found that peanuthouse.com is taken by someone who is not even using it?
That person had the idea to get the domain name first, and paid money to do so, just as the guy in that one-man corp you're hating on did. In fact, the guy in the one-man corp likely paid more for his corp name legacy than the domain name squatter paid for the same amount of time holding peanuthouse.com. Why can anyone feel entitled to a corp name enough to boot someone else who paid for the same corp name? That's true, and if making people buy corps from you for the name was a thing, I'd like it. If there was a game around it, if there was a reason in EVE to sit on a corp name... but there isn't :( I mean, I hear you're allowed to continually bump a freighter if you have an actual reason for doing so. (Don't take my word on that, it's normally considered grief play) I don't think corp names that belonged to actual corps that had members should be claimable, though. Those are a part of EVE history. All corps have at least one member. Fun fact, they're all also part of Eve history, for the same reason. And you can sell corpnames. Where does it say that you cannot? Flaming Head wrote:No, I want to datamine all the dead corps in Eve for other people wanting to start a corp. I already have a suitable corp name now after placing some punctuation half way through the name I originally wanted which was a pretty obscure mix of pretty random words and something quite personal to me. To be honest I was VERY surprised it was taken.
I did not expect this much hostility towards an idea designed to clean up the database, and free up some names for the new spunk coming into the game. Fair enough taking names from established players on a 3 year 'break' might be out of the question, but shutting down 'corporations' held by completely undeveloped alts on 5 year inactive accounts?
Something like this could probably be quite easily be coded into a script/parser with some kind IF/THEN function to delete entries with perameters surrounding '>5 year account inactivity' and 'character development = 0' (I don't pretend to be a programmer so mock me if needs be but I'm sure CCP's data trackers have perameters like these that could be taken advantage of). I'm sure some kind of database failsafe already exists to dump characters into their original noob corps if a bug causes them to become corpless.
Meh, I've said my piece which is what these forums are for at the end of the day. I'll leave the thread to burn in the flames.
They may still have value. Those corps can be tradeable commodities. Simply stripping them away is bad for business.
What business do you get from a 6+ year old alt who has never logged in past corp creation? |

Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
223
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:18:00 -
[42] - Quote
I'm surprised I got my corp name despite it be a very very popular and awesome movie. And when all else fails. http://thesaurus.com/ |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
306
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:19:00 -
[43] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:It's the same complaint that occurs about domain name squatting. What if you wanted to start a website for your deluxe peanut shop family business called Peanut House, but found that peanuthouse.com is taken by someone who is not even using it?
That person had the idea to get the domain name first, and paid money to do so, just as the guy in that one-man corp you're hating on did. In fact, the guy in the one-man corp likely paid more for his corp name legacy than the domain name squatter paid for the same amount of time holding peanuthouse.com. Why can anyone feel entitled to a corp name enough to boot someone else who paid for the same corp name? That's true, and if making people buy corps from you for the name was a thing, I'd like it. If there was a game around it, if there was a reason in EVE to sit on a corp name... but there isn't :( I mean, I hear you're allowed to continually bump a freighter if you have an actual reason for doing so. (Don't take my word on that, it's normally considered grief play) I don't think corp names that belonged to actual corps that had members should be claimable, though. Those are a part of EVE history. All corps have at least one member. Fun fact, they're all also part of Eve history, for the same reason. And you can sell corpnames. Where does it say that you cannot? Flaming Head wrote:No, I want to datamine all the dead corps in Eve for other people wanting to start a corp. I already have a suitable corp name now after placing some punctuation half way through the name I originally wanted which was a pretty obscure mix of pretty random words and something quite personal to me. To be honest I was VERY surprised it was taken.
I did not expect this much hostility towards an idea designed to clean up the database, and free up some names for the new spunk coming into the game. Fair enough taking names from established players on a 3 year 'break' might be out of the question, but shutting down 'corporations' held by completely undeveloped alts on 5 year inactive accounts?
Something like this could probably be quite easily be coded into a script/parser with some kind IF/THEN function to delete entries with perameters surrounding '>5 year account inactivity' and 'character development = 0' (I don't pretend to be a programmer so mock me if needs be but I'm sure CCP's data trackers have perameters like these that could be taken advantage of). I'm sure some kind of database failsafe already exists to dump characters into their original noob corps if a bug causes them to become corpless.
Meh, I've said my piece which is what these forums are for at the end of the day. I'll leave the thread to burn in the flames.
They may still have value. Those corps can be tradeable commodities. Simply stripping them away is bad for business. What business do you get from a 6+ year old alt who has never logged in past corp creation?
Hyperbole. You cannot prove their login data. And if you can, disclosing it here is a violation of the TOS and EULA.
So the answer remains: Their right to it is as valuable as yours or the OP's. More, actually, because they got it first. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Micheal Dietrich
Standards and Practices
239
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:24:00 -
[44] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:
Hyperbole. You cannot prove their login data. And if you can, disclosing it here is a violation of the TOS and EULA.
So the answer remains: Their right to it is as valuable as yours or the OP's. More, actually, because they got it first.
Uh, I kind of did back on page 2. |

Benny Ohu
The Lazy Dragoons True Apathy
50
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:25:00 -
[45] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:All corps have at least one member. Fun fact, they're all also part of Eve history, for the same reason.
No. Freaking. Way. All corps having at least one member? Are you serious? Like, really? True? Damn you're so good at EVE.
A one-day-alt corp that didn't actually engage with any other part of the EVE community in any meaningful way cannot be considered part of the game's history.
Really, mate, stop posting.
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Sounds like an untapped niche. Why are you here whining about it instead of out there selling corp names?
I think the difference between domain names and EVE is that the people who do it with domain names register things like, "halo4.com", names that are definitely going to be wanted by someone with money. Although corp names theoretically could be a sellable commodity, I don't think it'd actually happen in this game.
Please also remember the OP is talking specifically about characters on inactive accounts from years ago... I doubt those are intending to sell the name anytime soon.
Petrus Blackshell wrote: I think "amusement" is considered an "actual reason".
I do not think so If you want to, confirm with a GM, it's probably something I heard some corpies talking about once
|

Smithwick O'Flaherty
Kung Fu Treachery
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:25:00 -
[46] - Quote
i went the obscure movie reference route
|

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
306
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:26:00 -
[47] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:
Hyperbole. You cannot prove their login data. And if you can, disclosing it here is a violation of the TOS and EULA.
So the answer remains: Their right to it is as valuable as yours or the OP's. More, actually, because they got it first.
Uh, I kind of did back on page 2. "Possibly Inactive"
Yeah that looks really definitive right there boy. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Benny Ohu
The Lazy Dragoons True Apathy
50
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:28:00 -
[48] - Quote
Smithwick O'Flaherty wrote:i went the obscure movie reference route
arrgh i don't get it  |

Mark Androcius
9
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:29:00 -
[49] - Quote
There's a lot of imagination out there, for when it comes to making up names, a lot of characters have very funny, nice, cool or just realistic yet special names, so why would coming up with a name for a corp be such a problem? Yes i am dutch, no i don't do drugs. |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
306
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:31:00 -
[50] - Quote
Mark Androcius wrote:There's a lot of imagination out there, for when it comes to making up names, a lot of characters have very funny, nice, cool or just realistic yet special names, so why would coming up with a name for a corp be such a problem? It isn't, people just want Rules Lawyer mechanics to do most of the gaming for them. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Micheal Dietrich
Standards and Practices
239
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:32:00 -
[51] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Micheal Dietrich wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:
Hyperbole. You cannot prove their login data. And if you can, disclosing it here is a violation of the TOS and EULA.
So the answer remains: Their right to it is as valuable as yours or the OP's. More, actually, because they got it first.
Uh, I kind of did back on page 2. "Possibly Inactive" Yeah that looks really definitive right there boy.
Yeah, also take note that the 1 character doesn't have a portrait. Can't get into game until you make one. Think McFly Think!
You also aren't taking into account for the people who are just too damn lazy to kill the corp. I say if someone wants a shot at a corp name that appears to be inactive,then CCP can send an email to the account holder of the corp. Even if he doesn't play the game currently and still wants it then he can say no, I won't release it. If he doesn't answer in 10 days or says yeah give it up, then the corp can be relinquished to somebody who will use it. One of the older mmo's used to do this but sadly I can't remember which one it was. |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
306
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:34:00 -
[52] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Micheal Dietrich wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:
Hyperbole. You cannot prove their login data. And if you can, disclosing it here is a violation of the TOS and EULA.
So the answer remains: Their right to it is as valuable as yours or the OP's. More, actually, because they got it first.
Uh, I kind of did back on page 2. "Possibly Inactive" Yeah that looks really definitive right there boy. Yeah, also take note that the 1 character doesn't have a portrait. Can't get into game until you make one. Think McFly Think! You also aren't taking into account for the people who are just too damn lazy to kill the corp. I say if someone wants a shot at a corp name that appears to be inactive,then CCP can send an email to the account holder of the corp. Even if he doesn't play the game currently and still wants it then he can say no, I won't release it. If he doesn't answer in 10 days or says yeah give it up, then the corp can be relinquished to somebody who will use it. One of the older mmo's used to do this but sadly I can't remember which one it was. That seems like a lot of overhead for Princess Corpname TBH. An alternate solution is the newer player can come up with something themselves even if it isn't the perfect seven-mattress sandwich sans-pea.
I think that's my biggest problem here. It's the Princess and the freaking Pea. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Smithwick O'Flaherty
Kung Fu Treachery
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:35:00 -
[53] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:Smithwick O'Flaherty wrote:i went the obscure movie reference route
arrgh i don't get it 
mission accomplished =)
ill throw you a bone and bless you with an awesome movie
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1190536/ |

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
127
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:35:00 -
[54] - Quote
namron 7 wrote:Im sure that this is one of the rules of the internet.
"All the best names will be taken"
Just if you try such brainless stuff like: - "Killing Death" - "Death Killers" - "Black Killer" - "Black Death Killers" - "Legion of Killers" - "Black Legion of Killers" - "Batmans" - "Supermans" - "Micky Mouse" - "Black killing suber Micky Batman"
;) Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
759
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:36:00 -
[55] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote: You also aren't taking into account for the people who are just too damn lazy to kill the corp. I say if someone wants a shot at a corp name that appears to be inactive,then CCP can send an email to the account holder of the corp. Even if he doesn't play the game currently and still wants it then he can say no, I won't release it. If he doesn't answer in 10 days or says yeah give it up, then the corp can be relinquished to somebody who will use it. One of the older mmo's used to do this but sadly I can't remember which one it was.
This would be a solution, but my bets are that a cost/benefit analysis would put it pretty low on the list of CCP's priorities. Rifterlings - Small gang lowsec combat corp specializing in frigates and cruisers (all races, not just Rifters!). US Timezone veterans and newbies alike are welcome to join. Come chat in the "we fly rifters" in-game channel. Free fitted frigates for members! |

Romar Agent
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:46:00 -
[56] - Quote
I'm feeling the urge to open a corporation with the epic name "Taken by Alts"...
I understand the OP.
Especially when you research some of the more renowned character names, say Paul Atreides or Han Solo and get a pictureless account. |

Killer Gandry
V I R I I Ineluctable.
248
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:48:00 -
[57] - Quote
Romar Agent wrote:I'm feeling the urge to open a corporation with the epic name "Taken by Alts"...
I understand the OP.
Especially when you research some of the more renowned character names, say Paul Atreides or Han Solo and get a pictureless account.
Well, it could be worse. Your corp name could be Science and Trade Institute.
|

Nura Taron
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
19
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:04:00 -
[58] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:I think the OP has a good point about one-man minimum-skill alts taking up corp names. Their post wasn't about actual old corps, just one-man non-corps. Telling them to 'be more creative' to get around the issue doesn't make it any less of an issue. Those people paid their in-game ISK to reserve the name, too. If I had the oldest corp in Eve, came back, found it gone and me in an NPC corp... ...I'd wonder why they datamined my corp for a half-wit's naming woes tbfh. First, if having the corp was important to them they wouldn't have left it empty on an untrained alt. Secondly, If they haven't played in 5 years they're not coming back. |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
309
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:06:00 -
[59] - Quote
Nura Taron wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:I think the OP has a good point about one-man minimum-skill alts taking up corp names. Their post wasn't about actual old corps, just one-man non-corps. Telling them to 'be more creative' to get around the issue doesn't make it any less of an issue. Those people paid their in-game ISK to reserve the name, too. If I had the oldest corp in Eve, came back, found it gone and me in an NPC corp... ...I'd wonder why they datamined my corp for a half-wit's naming woes tbfh. First, if having the corp was important to them they wouldn't have left it empty on an untrained alt. Secondly, If they haven't played in 5 years they're not coming back. I have accounts from more than five years ago which are not currently subbed and haven't been for five or more years.
Therefore this is not a post.
Oh wait I mean therefore you have no ******* point. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Micheal Dietrich
Standards and Practices
240
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:08:00 -
[60] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Micheal Dietrich wrote: You also aren't taking into account for the people who are just too damn lazy to kill the corp. I say if someone wants a shot at a corp name that appears to be inactive,then CCP can send an email to the account holder of the corp. Even if he doesn't play the game currently and still wants it then he can say no, I won't release it. If he doesn't answer in 10 days or says yeah give it up, then the corp can be relinquished to somebody who will use it. One of the older mmo's used to do this but sadly I can't remember which one it was.
This would be a solution, but my bets are that a cost/benefit analysis would put it pretty low on the list of CCP's priorities.
I wouldn't expect this to be on any priorities list anytime in the near or distance future either, but I still like the concept of doing the occasional cleanup. DAOC's name's got so bad that you could hit the random name generator and it would tell you that name was taken. It seriously took like 5 minutes to make the character and 45 minutes to think of something obscure enough to get in. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |