| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nomakai Delateriel
Amarr
Ammatar Free Corps
   |
Posted - 2008.12.15 17:03:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Elsebeth Rhiannon
It is disappointing that CVA directly after the show of conciliation in the form of accepting a Gallentean executor would follow by a sign aggression.
Sign of aggression?
Where is the aggression in extending a defensive pact in response to changed policies of the Empire?
The mandate is back under direct the direct control of an Imperial house, and since it's a region where the CVA have strong political interests (in front of all securing the paths from 9uy4-H to High-Sec) it's only expected.
As for the Tribal Liberation Force. It isn't, and will never be, welcome in Derelik.
It's, as far as I know, primarily backed by the Brutor and Krusual tribes.
The Krusual will happily kidnap, mutilate and murder (with little or no justification) anyone with even a drop of Nefantar blood, and the Brutors are all too happy to let them do it.
______________________________________________
-My respect can not be won, only lost. It's given freely and only grudgingly withdrawn. |
Nomakai Delateriel
Amarr
Ammatar Free Corps
|
Posted - 2008.12.17 08:35:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Andreus Ixiris
But you're right, Vikarion, Heaven ****ing forbid I use Occam's Razor and suggest that a man with such a variable allegience and a known willingness to wiggle out of stated agreements might be untrustworthy?
Heaven forbit that the rest of use use Occam's razor and suggest that a man who is a long term enemy of the Amarr Empire and the Mandate is making baseless accusations against a prominent Ammatar pod-pilot in a last-ditch attempt to hurt the legitimacy of a growing pro-Amarrian league.
______________________________________________
-My respect can not be won, only lost. It's given freely and only grudgingly withdrawn. |
Nomakai Delateriel
Amarr
Ammatar Free Corps
|
Posted - 2008.12.17 09:04:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Andreus Ixiris
Originally by: Nomakai Delateriel
Heaven forbit that the rest of use use Occam's razor and suggest that a man who is a long term enemy of the Amarr Empire and the Mandate is making baseless accusations against a prominent Ammatar pod-pilot in a last-ditch attempt to hurt the legitimacy of a growing pro-Amarrian league.
That's an interesting choice of words, there, Nomakai - isn't it meant to be "pro-Ammatar"? Or has the mask finally come off?
I don't see how the concepts of being Pro-Ammatar and Pro-Amarr are in any way in opposition at this time.
Now if I said "Pro-Sarum" or "pro-Ardishapur" you might have an inkling (or less) of support.
When I say Pro-Amarr I mean Pro-Amarr. Supporting ALL the people of the Amarrian faith, supporting everyone who pledge their allegiance to the one true God and supporting everyone that accept the word of the scriptures into their hearts and minds.
______________________________________________
-My respect can not be won, only lost. It's given freely and only grudgingly withdrawn. |
Nomakai Delateriel
Amarr
Ammatar Free Corps
|
Posted - 2008.12.17 11:38:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Nomakai Delateriel on 17/12/2008 11:38:08
And once again you (Andreus Ixiris) show your (willful?) ignorance.
First of all. I'm a supporter of the Heideran policies and a progressivist. I've always been one and it has at times put me at odds with more traditionalist organizations. I don't remember seeing YOU at Liparer II and ready to suicide your ship against a Kor-azor fleet in order to make a last stand to protect the planetary population (luckily that was not necessary as the Speakers of Truth intervened).
As for Khanid.
Khanid is BOTH a Holder family, a people and a region. The region has little to do with the Khanid people, but is the domain of the Khanid Holder family (which happens to be pure-True Amarr).
The Khanid people were NEVER exiled and the demographics of the Khanid kingdom in relation to the Khanid people is not much different from anywhere else in the empire. Everywhere the Khanid people are respected and treasured allies, a people who have always been at the forefront of Amarr expansion and has ceaselessly supported the Amarr cause.
When people say "pro-khanid" they mean that they support the Khanid holder family, which is an entirely different deal.
And I can't recall the Ni-kunni ever coming up in a "pro" or "contra" discussion.
Also, "Pro-minmatar" and "pro-Ammatar" isn't the same thing either.
Not to mention that your view of the general slave situation in the Amarrian empire seems to have more incommon with gallentean holoreels than actual reality.
______________________________________________
-My respect can not be won, only lost. It's given freely and only grudgingly withdrawn. |
Nomakai Delateriel
Amarr
Ammatar Free Corps
|
Posted - 2008.12.23 15:54:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Wanoah
Originally by: Rustok
When CVA came out and helped the terrorist in UshraŠkhan.
I'm just going to assume that was a typo. CVA have done many things, but helping the Ushra'Khan is definitely not one of them!
Depends on how you interpret the events of the first Siege for 9uy4-h (between the Ushra'khan and the now dissolved Pirate Coalition).
At a few points there were CVA fleets operating in 9uy4-h while the siege was going on, primarily engaging Pirate Coalition vessels.
Though in my opinion it was more of a situation where the CVA had an opportunity to kill some reds that were conveniently gathered and shooting each other. Two flies with one stone. The pirate coalition fleets though were simply more exposed to outside interference.
______________________________________________
-My respect can not be won, only lost. It's given freely and only grudgingly withdrawn. |
| |
|