| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Atari Sakura
Minmatar INTERNET HARBLRAGE
|
Posted - 2008.12.13 22:44:00 -
[1]
I know most of us are sci-fi nerds or else we wouldn't be on a internet spaceships forum. What do you think the most likely future for humanity is based on what you've seen/read/played? Personally I think our society will either turn into a society like The Culture from the novels of Iain M. Banks, or be absorbed into a culture like theirs that discovers us. --- This forum is problematic.
Desu Sigs
|

Arianhod
|
Posted - 2008.12.13 22:47:00 -
[2]
Haruhiists - Overloading Out of Pod discussions since 2007. Haruhiists - Supporting Linkification since 2008
|

Dantes Revenge
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.12.13 22:52:00 -
[3]
The only way the world could go -- There's a simple difference between kinky and perverted. Kinky is using a feather to get her in the mood. Perverted is using the whole chicken. All this has happened before and will happen again |

MooKids
Caldari Dark Echo Engineering
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 00:08:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Dantes Revenge The only way the world could go
Or better yet, someone will discover the true purpose of the universe. -------------------------------- CCP can patch away bugs, but they can't patch away stupidity. |

Karrade Krise
Galatic P0RN Starz
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 00:12:00 -
[5]
Humans have a history of violence.
I predict in the distant future aliens will visit our planet, discover we killed each other and essentially, finished ourselves off.
We shall be known as the primitive suicidal species.
Voluntold, New Webcomic
|

soldieroffortune 258
Gallente Trinity Council.
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 00:30:00 -
[6]
i think it would be awesome if we evolved into a Star Trek OR Star Wars type universe, i could live in either one to be honest
Originally by: soldieroffortune 258
"Eve is about making yourself richer while making the other guy poorer"
|

Dantes Revenge
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 01:30:00 -
[7]
Originally by: soldieroffortune 258 i think it would be awesome if we evolved into a Star Trek OR Star Wars type universe, i could live in either one to be honest
So say we all.
However, unless someone manages to perfect cryogenic suspension, I doubt we'll ever live to see it.
-- There's a simple difference between kinky and perverted. Kinky is using a feather to get her in the mood. Perverted is using the whole chicken. All this has happened before and will happen again |

P'uck
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 02:25:00 -
[8]
Edited by: P''uck on 14/12/2008 02:25:07 I think we'll succumb to greed. (edit: and then nothing, just scorched earth and ****roaches)
Other than that, maybe some of the stuff leary predicted... like... well... actually some sort of borglike collective only existing in a big computer, i just hope it wont be an apple, their design makes my ego look fat.
|

Madius
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 02:53:00 -
[9]
Well, if humanity doesn't mature as a whole there might not be much of a future to look forward to. I do remain optimistic about it, though.
Also, I have to wonder at the idea that we're comparatively violent or primitive or the like... compared to what, exactly? We're the only sapient species we know of. It might be comforting to think that there could be "daddy aliens" out in the universe to protect and guide us, but there's also the chance we're alone (or at the top) and have to take care of ourselves.
|

F'nog
Amarr Celestial Horizon Corp. Celestial Industrial Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 06:04:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Madius Well, if humanity doesn't mature as a whole there might not be much of a future to look forward to. I do remain optimistic about it, though.
Also, I have to wonder at the idea that we're comparatively violent or primitive or the like... compared to what, exactly? We're the only sapient species we know of. It might be comforting to think that there could be "daddy aliens" out in the universe to protect and guide us, but there's also the chance we're alone (or at the top) and have to take care of ourselves.
This raises a point that I've seen Clarke poke fun at: the idea that any sufficiently advanced species that could travel between stars would have to be peaceful and benevolent.
Why? Why can't warlike species be advanced as well? A totalitarian, war-focused species could focus its resources on conquering space. So we could end up being screwed no matter what.
Originally by: Kazuma Saruwatari
F'nog for Amarr Emperor. Nuff said
Originally by: Chribba Go F'nog! You're a hero! Not a Zero! /me bows
|

soldieroffortune 258
Gallente Trinity Council.
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 07:07:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Dantes Revenge
Originally by: soldieroffortune 258 i think it would be awesome if we evolved into a Star Trek OR Star Wars type universe, i could live in either one to be honest
So say we all.
However, unless someone manages to perfect cryogenic suspension, I doubt we'll ever live to see it.
OPTIMISM PEOPLE! ! !
Originally by: soldieroffortune 258
"Eve is about making yourself richer while making the other guy poorer"
|

Atomos Darksun
Quantum Industries RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 07:11:00 -
[12]
Battlestar Galactica.
But only if I survive the whole series - considering 99.99% of the population dies in the first 10 minutes of the show, and over 1/5 of the remainder dies throughout the series.
But TBH, a sentient self improving machine is supposed to be invented by 2036, by current calculations of technological advancement. I don't believe that takes into account the various jumps in technology we've had in the past. (Read: Microprocessor). At that point we're SCREWED.
Originally by: Amoxin My vent is talking to me in a devil voice...
CONVERT TO LINKIFICATION! http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameb |

Ka Jolo
The Tuskers
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 07:27:00 -
[13]
The Lord returns. Bad people are punished by being exiled somewhere where they can't mess things up. God's children are taken with him into the heavens, where everyone has a great time, masters new technologies, and gets to do things with real purpose.
|

HankMurphy
Minmatar Pelennor Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 08:34:00 -
[14]
i'm going to go with either:
A) post apocalyptic fallout world like Roadwarrior. Except all the gas has dried up (no cars all over the ****ing place). Eventually a kid's crank music box becomes a shocking technological find.
B) science attempts to overcome all our shortcomings and eventually an AI takes over (first our chores, then our planet). See: matrix / backstory to dune / etcetcetc. (They either kill us off or enslave us, not that we should worry, most of us will die in the first wave) ---------- Seasons Greetings and have a Happy Alvis Time |

Irish Whiskey
Caldari Warped Mining
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 09:15:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Ka Jolo where everyone has a great time, masters new technologies
great time as in getting laid?
new technologies as in robots?
if heaven has sex robots i really need to get on that wagon.
|

Eran Laude
Gallente The Aduro Protocol
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 10:09:00 -
[16]
I believe that fundamentally the human race is too selfish to let itself die out - we will persevere whatever the cost, but the cost for the developed nations to survive may be too high for us to have any conscience left, i.e. reverting to Darwinism, ceasing aid to the LEDW in the coming times and letting the LEDCs duke it out between each other for a few years while we use our enormous, highly professional and well armed militaries to guard our and our allies borders - such as deploying the US Army to lock down the Mexican border or the EU battlegroups and navies to lock down the EU side of the Mediterranean and the Eastern borders. I fear this is the most likely future, but I wish it was not so.
However, the kind of future I would like to see are those proposed by Peter F. Hamilton in his works - where in the next 30-50 years a technological singularity or major breakthrough permits us to expand across the Galaxy with wild abandon, providing unlimited resources and trash worlds. It may not be a healthy pattern of expansion on one planet, but there's enough resources in the Solar System alone, let alone the Galaxy, to support an incredibly long stretch of human expansion. I think AI and/or Fusion power are likely to be the major breakthroughs that we need - fusion shuttles with a technically unlimited range and much faster speeds than the to-be-retired shuttles of our era could certainly make space expansion a lot more feasible.
|

Shanzem
Minmatar DarkStar 1 GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 10:42:00 -
[17]
Originally by: HankMurphy i'm going to go with either:
A) post apocalyptic fallout world like Roadwarrior. Except all the gas has dried up (no cars all over the ****ing place). Eventually a kid's crank music box becomes a shocking technological find.
B) science attempts to overcome all our shortcomings and eventually an AI takes over (first our chores, then our planet). See: matrix / backstory to dune / etcetcetc. (They either kill us off or enslave us, not that we should worry, most of us will die in the first wave)
Pretty much B, Hay blame the Japanese!
Man will be merged with machine. the human body can only support itself for xxx numbers of years. But the human mind if correctly looked after out of its body can live a VERY long time.
If you really want to know were this world is going you better keep tabs on the news and science articals of the next 5000 days.
Do not believe me? i can start a new thread with large amount of detail and new sources.
And on the note of machine killing man. its happened already many of times, it just was sentient. Accidents from machines (CNC etc) happen alot and people do die.
But its always due to human error. -------------------------------------------
|

Shanzem
Minmatar DarkStar 1 GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 10:43:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Atomos Darksun Battlestar Galactica.
But only if I survive the whole series - considering 99.99% of the population dies in the first 10 minutes of the show, and over 1/5 of the remainder dies throughout the series.
But TBH, a sentient self improving machine is supposed to be invented by 2036, by current calculations of technological advancement. I don't believe that takes into account the various jumps in technology we've had in the past. (Read: Microprocessor). At that point we're SCREWED.
Ding ding. IBM is already working on it, and was also proposed at the TED convention. -------------------------------------------
|

Shanzem
Minmatar DarkStar 1 GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 10:46:00 -
[19]
Originally by: soldieroffortune 258
Originally by: Dantes Revenge
Originally by: soldieroffortune 258 i think it would be awesome if we evolved into a Star Trek OR Star Wars type universe, i could live in either one to be honest
So say we all.
However, unless someone manages to perfect cryogenic suspension, I doubt we'll ever live to see it.
OPTIMISM PEOPLE! ! !
Then why limit yourself to your body? why is everyone obsessed with limiting them selfs to flesh and bone when you can surpass that??
Sure you could keep it until you have raised a family etc but once you hit a certain age you should be ported. we have the technology already.
-------------------------------------------
|

ReaperOfSly
Gallente Zetsubou Corp
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 11:50:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Shanzem once you hit a certain age you should be ported. we have the technology already.
orly_owl.jpg  ____________________
|

Shanzem
Minmatar DarkStar 1 GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 12:01:00 -
[21]
Edited by: Shanzem on 14/12/2008 12:05:51 Edited by: Shanzem on 14/12/2008 12:03:07
Originally by: ReaperOfSly
Originally by: Shanzem once you hit a certain age you should be ported. we have the technology already.
orly_owl.jpg 
Well yeah.
neurosky for control without any contact with the brain do a good read up its awesome stuff.
Brain: wiki for power consumption
End of the day, your sensory organs could be removed and artificially kept alive by a machine. your eyes and ears are the most important. those are very difficult to recreate
we can already create artificial lungs, hearts livers etc in plastic. they have been tried and tested and work.
then its just a matter of designed a system or flow control to move required chemicals etc around the brain. you onsume food for chemicals that your blood moves around your body. to your brain ETC in fact i bet if i put my brain to it i could come up with a small invention or atleast a step closer to you understanding what i mean.
ok limmie grab a coffee and load slashdot up i will grab you all the news sources aswell
 
we technically on a very basic level can use the brain for control and read dreams. -------------------------------------------
|

HankMurphy
Minmatar Pelennor Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 12:53:00 -
[22]
oh man i almost forgot my personal favorite: Death by Grey goooooo ---------- Seasons Greetings and have a Happy Alvis Time |

Mary Makepeace
Caldari Neh'bu Kau Beh'Hude Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 12:56:00 -
[23]
I personal would love The Banks like Culture society however i think things are more likely to go the Stross Transhuman/post-scarcity model as seen in Accelarando, (bring on our saviors, the space lobsters) and the solar system being turned into a Dison sphere of non-linear computational cantor dust.
|

Szent AdamKiraly
Banana.
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 13:06:00 -
[24]
I we turned into the culture i would eat my hat.
Would be so awesome though.
|

Davina Braben
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 15:35:00 -
[25]
None of the above.
It'll be the same old, same old but higher tech.
|

Stitcher
Caldari Duty.
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 15:56:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Arianhod On a more serious note - Alastair Reynolds.
History rhymes on a bigger scale, Moon colonized, solar system colonized, blood bath ensues. People recover after war much more advanced than they would have been given a century of peaceful progression but don't want to admit that from a technical point of view they came out the war better off than they went in.
People recover, peace ensues and they expand.
That has happened on Earth for god knows how long on ever larger scales and if we would be deluding ourselves if we thought otherwise for the next few centuries at least.
Mankind is driven and inspired by conflict and competition. the reason we saw such massive leaps in technology during the 20th century boils down to the fact that we had two huge wars, and nearly a third one.
I can't imagine that pattern being broken any time soon.
Still, it's a safe bet that any future colonization beyond our planet will be defined (at least at first) by primarily Western cultures, meaning democracies, and democracies don't war with each other, as a rule. It's only ever happened once, in fact, due to one of the countries involved being obligated to assist an allied nation that was at war with the other. Nobody actually fired a single shot.
What that means is that mankind's space colonies (I'm convinced they will happen) will most likely eventually become sovereign territories of their own with democratic systems of government. Off of Earth, you probably wouldn't see much in the way of warfare and if you did, it'd mostly involve unmanned vehicles. -
Captain Verin "Stitcher" Tarn-Hakatain. |

Hyveres
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 16:02:00 -
[27]
Well I tend a bit toward either the firefly variant or falloutishness.
Either we start terraforming , colonizing and spreading out among the stars with the earth & the first few colonies being rich and technologicly advanced while the frontier are semilow tech stuff to be exploited for resources or WW3 with very few survivors :)
"Subtlety is a thing for philosophy, not combat. If you're going to kill someone, you might as well kill them a whole lot." - Vulcan Raven, The Last Days Of Foxhound |

Arianhod
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 16:08:00 -
[28]
Hmm... with the colonies, I suspect that they will not be sovereign entities in and of themselves, but an expansion of the existing entities. Taking the USA and EU as main examples, make a cluster of Colonies then admit them to Washington/Brussels respectively as member states. Space colonization will occur only when NASA/ESA get down and build an orbital elevator or one of them has the balls to build a nuclear powered rocket. Till then it's a pipe dream.
I can't see India or China doing it anytime soon. Haruhiists - Overloading Out of Pod discussions since 2007. Haruhiists - Supporting Linkification since 2008
|

HankMurphy
Minmatar Pelennor Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 16:13:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Arianhod
I can't see India or China doing it anytime soon.
if there were a clear and urgent NEED for space colonization, i wouldn't count china out they have MASSIVE potential ---------- Seasons Greetings and have a Happy Alvis Time |

Arianhod
|
Posted - 2008.12.14 16:23:00 -
[30]
Originally by: HankMurphy
Originally by: Arianhod
I can't see India or China doing it anytime soon.
if there were a clear and urgent NEED for space colonization, i wouldn't count china out they have MASSIVE potential
Oh they need it the most, but I doubt they can. The amount of resources needed to build an Elevator is staggering but the EU and USA could finance one between them if they wanted and probably one each. The difference is that we have the technological expertise to build them in the near future given our investment into carbon nano tubing.
I am increasingly skeptical as to just how powerful China is as the economic incidents occur. That and China has problems building crap we ask them to design that we build, I can't see them solving carbon nanotube manufacturing and a heavy lift veichle to get the payload to GSO.... That said NASA ****ed up epicly with the Shuttle. Sure it looks nice and it's a nice soundbite that they have a "reusable" craft, but the correct term should be "mostly salvageable". Haruhiists - Overloading Out of Pod discussions since 2007. Haruhiists - Supporting Linkification since 2008
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |