| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Naomi Knight
Amarr
Imperial Academy
   |
Posted - 2009.01.02 10:09:00 -
[1]
Nighthawks role :1 gang module support + battlecruiser role which is dps support
oh and you cant fit it for that so it is clearly broken
!!!its role is not mission running with passive tank!!!
|
Naomi Knight
Amarr
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2009.01.02 10:24:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Xanos Blackpaw
it fits
pvp support NH:
5 HML T2
1 seige harm link
2 large shield extenders T2
1 EM shield hardener T2
2 Invu fields T2
2 PDU T2
1 DCU T2
2 BCU T2
2 shield extender rigs.
1 +5% PG rig and max skills.
this is a pretty nice anti support NH.
mwd?
need for implant? why other races command ships dont need it?
low dps?
still medicore tank?
why would anybody use this instead of another command ship?
|
Naomi Knight
Amarr
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2009.01.02 10:31:00 -
[3]
3 rigs worth more than the whole bc with the fit ....
|
Naomi Knight
Amarr
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2009.01.02 10:42:00 -
[4]
Originally by: PsychoBones
Edited by: PsychoBones on 02/01/2009 10:40:02
Originally by: Naomi Knight
3 rigs worth more than the whole bc with the fit ....
No more expensive than the Purger rigs Drake pilots are so fond of. If you can afford them, why not? If you can't afford them, don't fit them. But just because somebody can't afford/ won't fit rigs on a BC doesn't mean the BC sucks. And it doesn't change the fact that the Nighthawk can't do that. A similar Nighthawk fit requires an RCU and does only 60 DPS more, while having 4000 less shields (with slightly higher resists), and only a scram, no web. For 4x the cost.
1 thing is to fit for pve and one thing it to pvp. While in pve items worth the high price because in the long run they will get back the isk you spent on them ,but in pvp possibly you will loose the ship.
|
Naomi Knight
Amarr
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2009.01.02 11:21:00 -
[5]
No reason to bring a nighthawk over a drake if you dont want to use a command module,but fitting one is nearly impossible on a nighthawk. It needs a boost to be able to do what it meant to do.
|
Naomi Knight
Amarr
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2009.01.02 23:27:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Colonel Xaven
Originally by: ArmyOfMe
well, show me pvp setups for a nighthawk (both solo and small gang) that can compete with the drake setups posted in this thread then
There are various in this thread already. The point is that most people see the NH as better battlecruiser. I'm afraid to say it, but it isn't. A BlackOps is not a battleship, an AF is not a tackler, a logistics is not a damage dealer and so on. I hope you understand my point.
So why the other 3 field command ships are way better than their battlecruiser variants, even when they fit a command module?
|
Naomi Knight
Amarr
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2009.02.09 09:43:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Napro
If you fly Caldari, your ship is gimped 
How can you not know this yet? Just deal with it. Stay away from 1v1s in PvP and you'll be fine.
every race is fine in many vs lone situations ala ganks,but only caldari sux at 1vs1 :( |
Naomi Knight
Amarr
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2009.02.09 14:42:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Naomi Knight on 09/02/2009 14:42:44
So because some agent runnesrs prefer the nighthawk then it is acceptable it is weak in pvp with command mod? |
Naomi Knight
Amarr
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2009.02.09 20:12:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Derrios
You will receive no empathy from an Eos pilot:
Let the tears flow forever.
Eos is comparable to the vulture not the nighthawk...
Maybe thats why eos pilots failed to accept that balance change back then. |
| |
|