| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Diego Sarmoti
AQUILA INC
Verge of Collapse
0
   |
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
did this thread get moved? Talk about throwing a lamb in the lions den. |
Diego Sarmoti
AQUILA INC
Verge of Collapse
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 16:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Qui Shon wrote:
It's a question of degree, naturally. Right now you can just look at the big blobfight kb reports and see that there's entirely too much isk floating around in W-space.
I want my blues nerfed, because I want your blues nerfed. Now seriously, would a 10% drop in npc buyorder price (in line with the rest of the PvE reward changes) really be so bad? I wouldn't care a bit, as far as my personal income is concerned.
How does kb reports support lowering isk payouts? That statement is mind-numbingly tenuous to your point and you could say the same about null and high sec (OMG look at that bling mission golem, guess it's time to nerf xyz). One could also point to the fact that people in wh's are going to be slightly more inclined to pvp more ( kb kills is due to more people that want pvp rather than an abundance of isk).
Cap escalations are risky, trust me. Not to mention all the dudes who SD rather than give the km. Plus all the caps lost trying to make their bearing "safe."
It's terribad that you guys are calling for less isk. I say add more pvp RISK if you think things need to be tweaked. Talking about an awful mindset. Think more pvp and less pve.
PS. CCRES I thought was well aware of the risk in wh's? |
Diego Sarmoti
AQUILA INC
Verge of Collapse
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 21:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
Qui Shon wrote:Again, there is no "you guys", just me. So I'm free to **** off much of W-space "community" by arguing for reduced isk and increased difficulty of operating large blobs, nobody else will suffer for my forum whoring 
First you say you've been doing cap escalations by yourself for years, then in the next sentence you've been away for two years. And yet you proclaim to have the current 411 on wh life. 
Self-destruction is still a ship loss = risk. You, being from CCRES are familiar with this function of the game, yes? Caps are lost all the time in w-space.. bunches of them are recorded... I'm guessing at least half aren't.
I don't know what la-la land you were in during your 2 year "omg we got rolfcurbstomped so bad we didn't want to show by aharm, now I'm quitting" hiatus, but wow CCRES talking about how non-risky wh space is... just too rich to bother with.
If anything you are just making the argument that there should be MORE isk and risk in wh's not less, so self-righteous four-account care-bears have everything to worry about each time the roll out their "bling" If they have one tower in a C5+, it should be worthwhile for people to kick them out. As it stands, it's marginal at best.
If you haven't found small gang warfare in (or from) wh's you simply aren't looking. There is no arguing that, it's just a fact. There are real risks and real rewards. |
Diego Sarmoti
AQUILA INC
Verge of Collapse
2
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 08:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
You have yet to make a valid point as to why wh blue isk needs to be nerfed. So far is been bitter vet diatribe against bling, lame (faulty) logic mixed with a dash of contradiction... so yeah I feel it's fair game to point out some history for other readers (poor souls) of this awful thread so they can have a point of reference.
|
Diego Sarmoti
AQUILA INC
Verge of Collapse
2
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 18:42:00 -
[5] - Quote
Qui Shon wrote:
Backpedaling already? It's too late for you to appear as a non-flamer now. I expected better flaming tbh.
Or none at all if it was discussion you wanted, but on page 20+ almost nobody will want that.
I told you why nobody takes you (and the op) seriously, if that is backpedaling in your book, fine by me. |
| |
|