Hisec is supposed to be safe rite? then i guess its best that you do all you can to protect the innocent carebearing community that dutifully pays their monthly subs that means you can continue living the life in $1,000 jeans.

I don't wear pants but I do play Eve. At the same time.

If you don't like the nerfs then maybe you should find a game that's more your style?
Or maybe change with the changes and find a way to keep doing what you're doing?
Aren't you innovative enough to think of ways to keep going?
Someone makes what you like doing a little bit harder and suddenly you can't cope?

Grow some balls man!

It just means you'll get really good at scanning.
Maybe you could start scanning down wormholes and start looking for treats there, instead of silly mission runners who don't understand that they shouldn't shoot at you?

Consider these recent changes that go against past notions and comments that CCP liked 'alternative gameplay'

1. Scanning nerf no1 - after they had made it accesable and usable by all, they nerfed it again so it took much longer to complete a scan
2. 'attempted' Orca nerf - breaking a macro so that you cant change ships in space while aggressed, but curiosly for hisec orcas only
3. Scanning nerf no2 - you now need anything scanned to 25% to see what class of ship it is

My initial suspicion is some CCP alt got ganked by some mission invading ninja and decided to make the game all warm and fuzzy again

Hisec is supposed to be safe rite? then i guess its best that you do all you can to protect the innocent carebearing community that dutifully pays their monthly subs that means you can continue living the life in $1,000 jeans.

Another thing, prior warning of changes that you are making i hope isnt classed as a breach of NDA, because it would be great to know in advance when and where you plan to break the game



gg bro

While using the system scanner scan results with less than 25% strength using three or more probes will now display the appropriate generic bracket for ships, structures, and anomalies.

your style however, i can do without

It depresses the hell out of me that I still don't know wtf I'm doing when I try to scan something even though they've apparently nerfed the whole scanning thing and dumbed it down a bunch of times. Damn I'm dumb :(

to answer a question with a question;

is it wrong to comment on CCP actively nerfing and placing hurdles in front of those who would be innovative and creative with the game in the name of protecting hisec carebears who initiate PVP and then die because of it?

whats next?

removal of hisec aggro mechanics?

this is usually the point where i lose interest and post ponies

Yup! You're what's bad for EVE.

Orca's were removing all highsec aggro mechanics. In a second, you could store your ship, jet your pod out and be completely safe. 100% consequence free.

this is usually the point where i lose interest and post ponies

also, im not sure i ever ship swapped with an Orca to AVOID combat, it was usually into a ship to kill the bully of a mission runner who picked on my little frigate with his battleship

Not so bad as that I still have no idea how to make a proper BM for a JF or the like at a gate or station. Real fun seeing them bumb off or land way too far to dock or jump instantly.

Why do self titled "tear collectors" themselves generate a lot of tears?

Come to 0.0 or lowsec for opponents instead of victims

Come to 0.0 or lowsec for opponents instead of victims

We weren't hugged enough as children so get very sad, to make ourselves feel better we make other people feel sad which makes our happiness grow stronger.

I thought it was because in a group of people when you pick on someone other people are less likely to pick on you. It's a way to ward off attacks against you. the side effect is that person's sadness. isn't it better that someone else is sad than feeling sad yourself when someone picks on you? I don't think people feel happy when they make others sad. I think its more that you feel safer, because you feel stronger?

I could be wrong tho, depends on the person.