EVE Search - Capitol Ships in High Security Space

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Capitol Ships in High Security Space

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Arco Aristo	Posted - 2009.01.21 17:56:00 - [1] What is your opinion on the subject? Mine is that they should but with most of there weapons disable and for Titans they should have there Doomsday Inactive while in High Security. I also beleive that they should only be allowed to come into 0.7 and lower. What is your opinion?, you heard mine, Please post your thoughts.
Cendaliaa	Posted - 2009.01.21 17:57:00 - [2] Originally by: Arco Aristo What is your opinion on the subject? Mine is that they should but with most of there weapons disable and for Titans they should have there Doomsday Inactive while in High Security. I also beleive that they should only be allowed to come into 0.7 and lower. What is your opinion?, you heard mine, Please post your thoughts. Why?
Veronica Waters	Posted - 2009.01.21 17:59:00 - [3] Doomsdays don't even work in low sec. What is the purpose behind this incredibly stupid idea?
LadyLubU2 Caldari	Posted - 2009.01.21 17:59:00 - [4] Originally by: Cendaliaa Originally by: Arco Aristo What is your opinion on the subject? Mine is that they should but with most of there weapons disable and for Titans they should have there Doomsday Inactive while in High Security. I also beleive that they should only be allowed to come into 0.7 and lower. What is your opinion?, you heard mine, Please post your thoughts. Why? So that every highsec carebear can get a capitol ship and use it to mine with it? ---
Chocratess	Posted - 2009.01.21 18:00:00 - [5] whats wrong with things how they are now? if you dont want caps in hi sec then just get 1000+ ppl to come help you suicide the few remaining cap ships in hisec and what good do they do in hisec anyways? Touch not the Cat bot a Glove
Cendaliaa	Posted - 2009.01.21 18:03:00 - [6] Originally by: LadyLubU2 Originally by: Cendaliaa Originally by: Arco Aristo What is your opinion on the subject? Mine is that they should but with most of there weapons disable and for Titans they should have there Doomsday Inactive while in High Security. I also beleive that they should only be allowed to come into 0.7 and lower. What is your opinion?, you heard mine, Please post your thoughts. Why? So that every highsec carebear can get a capitol ship and use it to mine with it? kinda worthless when there are better solutions.
LadyLubU2 Caldari	Posted - 2009.01.21 18:04:00 - [7] Originally by: Cendaliaa Originally by: LadyLubU2 Originally by: Cendaliaa Originally by: Arco Aristo What is your opinion on the subject? Mine is that they should but with most of there weapons disable and for Titans they should have there Doomsday Inactive while in High Security. I also beleive that they should only be allowed to come into 0.7 and lower. What is your opinion?, you heard mine, Please post your thoughts. Why? So that every highsec carebear can get a capitol ship and use it to mine with it? kinda worthless when there are better solutions. How about a carrier with 15x mining drone II afk mining? ---
Gnomes Rock	Posted - 2009.01.21 18:07:00 - [8] Yeah, lets give all capitals a safe-haven in high sec while prepping for attacks/being idiots.
Cendaliaa	Posted - 2009.01.21 18:11:00 - [9] Originally by: LadyLubU2 Originally by: Cendaliaa kinda worthless when there are better solutions. How about a carrier with 15x mining drone II afk mining? then its better mining in a hauler with perma shield. saves up on dead mining drones and has more space.4 But first good luck in finding big roids in high sec :)
Arco Aristo	Posted - 2009.01.21 19:30:00 - [10] Ok so if you thought it is stupid then dont reply bunch moron losers cant even have an opinion about any thing so if you have nothing good to say then dont post

Zhilia Mann	Posted - 2009.01.21 19:56:00 - [11] Originally by: Arco Aristo What is your opinion?, you heard mine, Please post your thoughts. Originally by: Arco Aristo Ok so if you thought it is stupid then dont reply bunch moron losers cant even have an opinion about any thing so if you have nothing good to say then dont post Just saying. And to be constructive... Why? There are plenty of things that are broken or could at least use improvement in EVE, but the hisec ban on caps doesn't seem to fit that category. Do you have a specific reason for change?
Neyro7830 Gallente Axxeon	Posted - 2009.01.21 19:59:00 - [12] Originally by: Arco Aristo Ok so if you thought it is stupid then dont reply bunch moron losers cant even have an opinion about any thing so if you have nothing good to say then dont post Translation: HURRRR DURRRRR YOU DON'T AGREE HURRRR TROLL HERRRR DERP DERP DERP Oh god how did this get here I am not good with computer
Arco Aristo	Posted - 2009.01.21 20:42:00 - [13] Well think of the options a titan for example could be used as a mobile station, just a thought I just asked for opinions nothing more
Mou'adib Gallente Fluffy Rabbit Killers	Posted - 2009.01.21 20:44:00 - [14] Originally by: Arco Aristo Ok so if you thought it is stupid then dont reply bunch moron losers cant even have an opinion about any thing so if you have nothing good to say then dont post we post because its a stupid idea. If no one post to call out the ppl with stupid ideas, then some may start to think they actually have good ideas. This one of course is not a good idea. There is no valid reason to have capitols in high sec other then for carebears to mine in security as was previously stated.
Mou'adib Gallente Fluffy Rabbit Killers	Posted - 2009.01.21 20:45:00 - [15] Originally by: Arco Aristo Well think of the options a titan for example could be used as a mobile station, just a thought I just asked for opinions nothing more i believe that last patch came out with a ship like that
Katy Karkinoff Minmatar Psycho Chicks	Posted - 2009.01.21 20:47:00 - [16] you asked for opinions, got some and said they were nonconstructive because they didn't agree with you. Bravo. As for caps in high sec for logistics? dude you already got your damn jump freighters. Be happy nao.
Mou'adib Gallente Fluffy Rabbit Killers	Posted - 2009.01.21 20:49:00 - [17] cough orca
Arco Aristo	Posted - 2009.01.21 20:53:00 - [18] Yeah we carebears do have the orca but it is not ment to be a mobile base and even if it was it would have to have a escort for protection Jerk
Mou'adib Gallente Fluffy Rabbit Killers	Posted - 2009.01.21 21:00:00 - [19] Originally by: Arco Aristo Yeah we carebears do have the orca but it is not ment to be a mobile base and even if it was it would have to have a escort for protection Jerk Its high sec, almost every system has a station. what extra are you looking for?
Arco Aristo	Posted - 2009.01.21 21:03:00 - [20] let me think some way to kill you idiots when you steal from us

Dau Imperius Amarr	Posted - 2009.01.21 21:04:00 - [21] Personally I'd like to have the ability to use a capital ship for mission running (especialy with the chages CCP might finally make to them in the upcoming patches expansion) in high sec. The same right every other pod pilot with the skillpoints have. Do I see CONCORD restricting say an Empires capital ships for being in a high sec system? (Where does the Amarr navy drydock thier capitals for instance surely not in low sec space.) No. And realisitcally considerinn the sizes of these new jumpgates I've been seeing that can jump something the mass of a freighter, a carrier and dreadnaught are not unrealistic to have in any space (IE: Space...endless big void where size doesn't matter.) The only responses I see here are: 'No, we want to blow the big ships up right where they are.' If missions are finally going to get some NPC love (harder?) it's only reasonable for every pilot to use all the tools at thier disposle, including ships they can use. And honestly they already made a prescedent when they first released capitals into high sec production. (The Veldnaught is not ther only cap ship in high sec space.) I've played this game for almost six years. Just because I choose to stay away from the freaks the rest of you all are in your 'lolz world' of low sec/0.0, doesn't mean I shouldn't be able to use ships for whatever rason I wish to. Isn't that a sanbox? (No that term doesn't apply to just PvP rubbish, so wake up.)
PARTOK TOMPSON	Posted - 2009.01.21 21:07:00 - [22] IBTH \o/
Mou'adib Gallente Fluffy Rabbit Killers	Posted - 2009.01.21 21:09:00 - [23] Edited by: Mou''adib on 21/01/2009 21:09:56 Originally by: Dau Imperius Personally I'd like to have the ability to use a capital ship for mission running (especialy with the chages CCP might finally make to them in the upcoming patches expansion) in high sec. The same right every other pod pilot with the skillpoints have. Do I see CONCORD restricting say an Empires capital ships for being in a high sec system? (Where does the Amarr navy drydock thier capitals for instance surely not in low sec space.) No. And realisitcally considerinn the sizes of these new jumpgates I've been seeing that can jump something the mass of a freighter, a carrier and dreadnaught are not unrealistic to have in any space (IE: Space...endless big void where size doesn't matter.) The only responses I see here are: 'No, we want to blow the big ships up right where they are.' If missions are finally going to get some NPC love (harder?) it's only reasonable for every pilot to use all the tools at thier disposle, including ships they can use. And honestly they already made a prescedent when they first released capitals into high sec production. (The Veldnaught is not ther only cap ship in high sec space.) I've played this game for almost six years. Just because I choose to stay away from the freaks the rest of you all are in your 'lolz world' of low sec/0.0, doesn't mean I shouldn't be able to use ships for whatever rason I wish to. Isn't that a sanbox? (No that term doesn't apply to just PvP rubbish, so wake up.) risk vs reward. Eve has always been about this. If CCP allows caps into missions(deadspace). It will be in low sec. there is no point in keeping more farmers in highsec. You want to make more cash, come and risk your ship with the rest of us. And yes High sec is a sandbox
Arco Aristo	Posted - 2009.01.21 21:19:00 - [24] Originally by: Dau Imperius Personally I'd like to have the ability to use a capital ship for mission running (especialy with the chages CCP might finally make to them in the upcoming patches expansion) in high sec. The same right every other pod pilot with the skillpoints have. Do I see CONCORD restricting say an Empires capital ships for being in a high sec system? (Where does the Amarr navy drydock thier capitals for instance surely not in low sec space.) No. And realisitcally considerinn the sizes of these new jumpgates I've been seeing that can jump something the mass of a freighter, a carrier and dreadnaught are not unrealistic to have in any space (IE: Space...endless big void where size doesn't matter.) The only responses I see here are: 'No, we want to blow the big ships up right where they are.' I like you thoughts and it is a good idea thanks for your opinion but I think Mou'Adib should shut up he is just being negative because he hates carebeares and anyone with common sense. If missions are finally going to get some NPC love (harder?) it's only reasonable for every pilot to use all the tools at thier disposle, including ships they can use. And honestly they already made a prescedent when they first released capitals into high sec production. (The Veldnaught is not ther only cap ship in high sec space.) I've played this game for almost six years. Just because I choose to stay away from the freaks the rest of you all are in your 'lolz world' of low sec/0.0, doesn't mean I shouldn't be able to use ships for whatever rason I wish to. Isn't that a sanbox? (No that term doesn't apply to just PvP rubbish, so wake up.)
Arco Aristo	Posted - 2009.01.21 21:20:00 - [25] sorry mesed that up I like you thoughts and it is a good idea thanks for your opinion but I think Mou'Adib should shut up he is just being negative because he hates carebeares and anyone with common sense.
Normin Bates	Posted - 2009.01.21 21:40:00 - [26] How many strip minerz can I fit on a Leviathan? Or maybe a veldspar DD? Can I park 10 Orcas and 50 Hulks in it? While we're at it fit it with a moon mining array too plz.
Imaos	Posted - 2009.01.21 22:46:00 - [27] Why a capitol ship in high sec? Do you want to perform an inauguration? Imaos
Dirk Magnum Royal Hiigaran Navy	Posted - 2009.01.21 23:45:00 - [28] Edited by: Dirk Magnum on 21/01/2009 23:52:13 Originally by: Dau Imperius Personally I'd like to have the ability to use a capital ship for mission running (especialy with the chages CCP might finally make to them in the upcoming patches expansion) in high sec. The same right every other pod pilot with the skillpoints have. Do I see CONCORD restricting say an Empires capital ships for being in a high sec system? (Where does the Amarr navy drydock thier capitals for instance surely not in low sec space.) No. And realisitcally considerinn the sizes of these new jumpgates I've been seeing that can jump something the mass of a freighter, a carrier and dreadnaught are not unrealistic to have in any space (IE: Space...endless big void where size doesn't matter.) The only responses I see here are: 'No, we want to blow the big ships up right where they are.' If missions are finally going to get some NPC love (harder?) it's only reasonable for every pilot to use all the tools at thier disposle, including ships they can use. And honestly they already made a prescedent when they first released capitals into high sec production. (The Veldnaught is not ther only cap ship in high sec space.) I've played this game for almost six years. Just because I choose to stay away from the freaks the rest of you all are in your 'lolz world' of low sec/0.0, doesn't mean I shouldn't be able to use ships for whatever rason I wish to. Isn't that a sanbox? (No that term doesn't apply to just PvP rubbish, so wake up.) This is assuming that high sec mission running isn't stupidly imbalanced in favor of reward already. It is though, and needs to have more risk injected into it stat. People replacing their CNRs with carriers so they can run the upcoming improved missions as easily as they run missions now just sets us back into the same idiotic state of risk-free ISK generation that high sec missions currently are. Yes the game is a sandbox, but the same people who are now asking for cap ships and their huge tank in High Sec are the same people who asked for (and received, several times) more CONCORD protection. In other words, the same ones who took some sand out of the box that the more aggressive players were using.
Foulque	Posted - 2009.01.21 23:57:00 - [29] lol Seriously cant think of anything else to say ________
achoura	Posted - 2009.01.22 00:37:00 - [30] wth would cap go back into high sec after ccp already took them out? *The EVE servers and their patches*



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.