EVE Search - Remote skill manager

All Channels

EVE New Citizens Q&A

Remote skill manager

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
The Truckdriver Minmatar	Posted - 2009.01.28 13:06:00 - [1] Hi there, Is there somewhere a tool based on API, where I can remotely change skill training without logging into eve, or put a que on it so it auto executes. Possibly through the web, or based from a mobile phone? Thx.
Snasty Caldari The Hippies House of Mercury	Posted - 2009.01.28 13:35:00 - [2] Originally by: The Truckdriver Hi there, Is there somewhere a tool based on API, where I can remotely change skill training without logging into eve, or put a que on it so it auto executes. Possibly through the web, or based from a mobile phone? Thx. Simple answer is no.
Lothros Andastar Gallente	Posted - 2009.01.28 21:44:00 - [3] Originally by: Snasty Originally by: The Truckdriver Hi there, Is there somewhere a tool based on API, where I can remotely change skill training without logging into eve, or put a que on it so it auto executes. Possibly through the web, or based from a mobile phone? Thx. Simple answer is no. The more complex answer is No, and trying it will get you banned.
Elysarian Minmatar dudetruck corp	Posted - 2009.01.28 22:41:00 - [4] Originally by: The Truckdriver Hi there, Is there somewhere a tool based on API, where I can remotely change skill training without logging into eve, or put a que on it so it auto executes. Possibly through the web, or based from a mobile phone? Thx. It's called a laptop (with Shader Model 2 support) and a WiFi connection so you can log into Eve from a hotspot
bitters much Nekkid Inc.	Posted - 2009.01.29 09:33:00 - [5] I use a program called: Wife 1.0 , its abit expensive though but with they right config it is doing quite well.
Dark Pict	Posted - 2009.01.29 10:37:00 - [6] Edited by: Dark Pict on 29/01/2009 10:36:53 Originally by: bitters much Edited by: bitters much on 29/01/2009 09:58:35 I use a program called: Wife 1.0 , its abit expensive though but with the right config it is doing quite well. Just don't instal Wife 1.0 onto the same system as Mistress 1.0 as they have severe compatibility problems
Tzar'rim	Posted - 2009.01.29 11:49:00 - [7] Originally by: Dark Pict Edited by: Dark Pict on 29/01/2009 10:36:53 Originally by: bitters much Edited by: bitters much on 29/01/2009 09:58:35 I use a program called: Wife 1.0 , its abit expensive though but with the right config it is doing quite well. Just don't instal Wife 1.0 onto the same system as Mistress 1.0 as they have severe compatibility problems Don't run either for too long cause they drain your battery like mad.
Nader Hoth	Posted - 2009.01.29 14:34:00 - [8] Edited by: Nader Hoth on 29/01/2009 14:34:32 The problem with any version of Wife (1.0 - n) is that while it is a major resource hog it has a tendency to not draw on the battery significantly. This tends to require that you initiate a manual battery discharge prior to onset of damage to the internal power systems. Mistress 1.0 or later will manage the battery system but is also a major resource user as well. Furthermore, if Wife 1.0+ and Mistress 1.0+ come in conflict it is extremely possible that a forced partion will be required. Thus leaving you with significantly less resources to draw from for the foreseeable future.
Novus Morningstar Gallente Tactical Enforcement Company	Posted - 2009.01.30 00:44:00 - [9] Originally by: Nader Hoth Edited by: Nader Hoth on 29/01/2009 14:34:32 The problem with any version of Wife (1.0 - n) is that while it is a major resource hog it has a tendency to not draw on the battery significantly. This tends to require that you initiate a manual battery discharge prior to onset of damage to the internal power systems. Mistress 1.0 or later will manage the battery system but is also a major resource user as well. Furthermore, if Wife 1.0+ and Mistress 1.0+ come in conflict it is extremely possible that a forced partion will be required. Thus leaving you with significantly less resources to draw from for the foreseeable future. Wow, good job taking the joke to the extreme... -- Tactical Enforcement Company My Skills
Shadow666Dragon Gallente	Posted - 2009.01.30 10:11:00 - [10] Edited by: Shadow666Dragon on 30/01/2009 10:12:14 I heard that "Duce Bigalo 1.0" is a better program and free. But it does something with Wife 1.0 and Mistress 1.0 (or later version) if you have them install. Well I heard that Duce Bigalo 1.0 takes both programs and F@#@$@#%@$cks their as#WR# around especially when you are not looking. The only way to fix this is by Renaming the Dir folder of Wife 1.0 and Mistress 1.0 to something else and Duce will not find them and you will not have problems. Well the way you know Duce has been ^&&^&*&ing your Wife and Mistress is that you will always find a copy of the Duce Bigalo 1.0 (program) (with file extension .open_wide) in the Wife and Mistress bin folders. But besides abusing your wife and Mistress, Duce does everything you need with your Remote Skill Training...Goodluck!
bitters much Nekkid Inc.	Posted - 2009.01.30 10:33:00 - [11] You can easily avoid any problems with Wife 1.0 by regular patching with Flowers 2.0 or Candy 3.1, sometime it even works by installing Hug 1.1 as it comes for free instead of the other 2 programs.
Shadow666Dragon Gallente	Posted - 2009.01.30 11:04:00 - [12] Originally by: bitters much You can easily avoid any problems with Wife 1.0 by regular patching with Flowers 2.0 or Candy 3.1, sometime it even works by installing Hug 1.1 as it comes for free instead of the other 2 programs. Well, if you like it with Flowers then get GardenStakeOut 1.0, works like a charm, but it has a virus called Snake 1.x, and which shuts down Wife, Mistress, and Duce Bigalo, and while GardenStakeOut continues training your skills, Snake 1.x embeds in your registry and starts deleting everything, so you might want to actually be careful to use it once, because once you start the program you cannot shut it down and if you do, Snake 1.x will come out and your registry is gone. I have found people who have found a way around that, what they do is place the computer in HYBERNATION, but not STANDBY, and when you bring back the computer from hyb, then GardenStakeOut is still running and you are safe. Goodluck!

Chribba Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire	Posted - 2009.01.30 11:07:00 - [13] Wasn't Wife 1.0 and Mistress 1.0 regulated by the Account Sharing Violation 1.2? Secure 3rd party service

Shadow666Dragon Gallente	Posted - 2009.01.30 11:17:00 - [14] Originally by: Chribba Wasn't Wife 1.0 and Mistress 1.0 regulated by the Account Sharing Violation 1.2? Wife and Mistress were ban in the United Fair Trade Summit 2008. "I sense the dark side is strong with this one" DOOMSDAY DEFINES ALL
bitters much Nekkid Inc.	Posted - 2009.01.30 11:27:00 - [15] Edited by: bitters much on 30/01/2009 11:34:29 Edited by: bitters much on 30/01/2009 11:32:07 Originally by: Chribba Wasn't Wife 1.0 and Mistress 1.0 regulated by the Account Sharing Violation 1.2? Wife 1.0 is pretty safe as its normally operates from your standart IP, Mistress 1.0 is abit tricky as it normally operates from a different IP ( as intended just for security reasons ). Also, even CCP must know that after you installed Wife 1.0 you have to live with all the consequenses and I don`t think CCP will punish anyone who already suffers from Wife 1.0 or later versions.
Shadow666Dragon Gallente	Posted - 2009.01.30 11:50:00 - [16] Originally by: bitters much Edited by: bitters much on 30/01/2009 11:34:29 Edited by: bitters much on 30/01/2009 11:32:07 Originally by: Chribba Wasn't Wife 1.0 and Mistress 1.0 regulated by the Account Sharing Violation 1.2? Wife 1.0 is pretty safe as its normally operates from your standart IP, Mistress 1.0 is abit tricky as it normally operates from a different IP ( as intended just for security reasons ). Also, even CCP must know that after you installed Wife 1.0 you have to live with all the consequenses and I don`t think CCP will punish anyone who already suffers from Wife 1.0 or later versions. You sound like my Wife already, just keep things in the low...
Kirana Minmatar Lynch Holdings Frater Adhuc Excessum	Posted - 2009.01.30 20:05:00 - [17] Getting Wife 1.0 and Mistress 1.0 to play nice on the same system is really rather simple. Run Mistress 1.0 from a VM that spoofs as your office IP, and make sure to disable file sharing on the VM. And you might want to avoid installing the VM compatibility tools on the host running Wife 1.0 as the VM may then broadcast errors and announcements from Mistress 1.0 back to the host via event logs. If you are running the OS X version of Wife 1.0... It's very important that you disable Growl for the VM as well as Mistress 1.0. Might want to flag an exception in Spotlight as well. Then again you could just run Friend With Benefits Beta 3. It's open source, free, and has far more frequent upgrades as well as more features than Wife 1.0 and Mistress 1.0
Gideon Haldura	Posted - 2009.01.31 06:32:00 - [18] Greatest. Thread. Ever. My fiance couldn't figure out why I was laughing so hard. Then she read it and said "I've never heard of software called "wife" before. How's it work? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOOOOOL!!!!!

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.