EVE Search - Some high res screens from new expansion on sisi

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Some high res screens from new expansion on sisi

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Caiman Graystock Caldari	Posted - 2009.02.09 20:08:00 - [91] Yeah they are all similar size, the dimensions look different because of me zooming in with the camera and what have you, sorry.
Dari Anoh Amarr Imperial Academy	Posted - 2009.02.09 20:10:00 - [92] Edited by: Dari Anoh on 09/02/2009 20:11:43 Edited by: Dari Anoh on 09/02/2009 20:11:12 Originally by: Irida Mershkov Hang on, are these ships the same size? the one looks like it should be frigate sized, the other at Battlecruiser ish, I haven't really got any dimensions to go by, but is one just fat and the other long and skinny? CCP has stated the T3 ships released for the next expansion are "Strategic Cruisers". This means while sizes may vary due to the components chosen to glue one together, they are all just that: cruisers. Edit: Typo (which is Greek for "frickin' error" )
Tippia Raddick Explorations BlackWater.	Posted - 2009.02.09 20:11:00 - [93] Originally by: Steve Celeste Tengu, meet Cerberus. Cerberus, Tengu. …except that that's a temp icon.
Caiman Graystock Caldari	Posted - 2009.02.09 20:28:00 - [94] Dense Veldspar and normal Veldspar (Big and Small roids respectively). I think the dense looks better. http://dl.eve-files.com/media/0902/2009.02.09.20.22.31.jpg
Neth'Rae Gallente Decorum Inc HUZZAH FEDERATION	Posted - 2009.02.09 20:30:00 - [95] Originally by: Steve Celeste Originally by: Tippia I mean, sure, the CNR icon can be confused with the Raven icon (if you're blind or just can't read), but I can't really imagine that the T3 parts will look like anything from the T2 stable. Tengu, meet Cerberus. Cerberus, Tengu. Steve Celeste, meet placeholder icons. Placeholder icons, Steve Celeste.
Lucas Tigh East Khanid Trading Khanid Trade Syndicate	Posted - 2009.02.09 20:32:00 - [96] Edited by: Lucas Tigh on 09/02/2009 20:32:43 I can has Proteus (epic name is epic) model screens? Skinned or not... I'm deprived of Sisi at the moment. D:
Caiman Graystock Caldari	Posted - 2009.02.09 20:35:00 - [97] Originally by: Lucas Tigh Edited by: Lucas Tigh on 09/02/2009 20:32:43 I can has Proteus (epic name is epic) model screens? Skinned or not... I'm deprived of Sisi at the moment. D: Only caldari and minmatar models seem to be in at the moment. Amarr are all spheres, and Gallente subsystems havent been seeded properly so no one can fly one yet.
Lucas Tigh East Khanid Trading Khanid Trade Syndicate	Posted - 2009.02.09 20:38:00 - [98] Ah, damn. Thanks for the update, though. :)
Dirk Magnum Royal Hiigaran Navy	Posted - 2009.02.09 20:38:00 - [99] Amazingly first to point out that the name Strategic Cruiser does not really make sense. Would Modular Cruiser have been such a bad choice?
Lucas Tigh East Khanid Trading Khanid Trade Syndicate	Posted - 2009.02.09 20:42:00 - [100] Edited by: Lucas Tigh on 09/02/2009 20:45:27 Originally by: Dirk Magnum Amazingly first to point out that the name Strategic Cruiser does not really make sense. Would Modular Cruiser have been such a bad choice? Ah, but one must strategize to find the best load out for one's shiny new T3 ship. Besides, Modular Cruiser is far too blunt and not at all creative. It'd be like naming EVE Online "This Isn't a Glorified Spreadsheet, Honest! Online." Edit: fixed an embarrassing grammatical error. <_<
Suboran Gallente Victory Not Vengeance Intrepid Crossing	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:00:00 - [101] Originally by: N'irrti new fitting screen is crappy at best :/ shiny and blinky but nowhere near practical i think it sucks, to large and unpracticle use of space, why have a big hole in the middle?
Ruziel Minmatar RUN Exploration Corps	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:00:00 - [102] Shots of stats for Minmatar Loki and modules: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Loki_Attributes.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Loki_Fitting.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Loki_Prereqs.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Min_Modules_Defensive.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Min_Modules_Electronic.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Min_Modules_Engineering.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Min_Modules_Offensive.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Min_Modules_Propulsion.jpg
Akor Flandres	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:01:00 - [103] Originally by: Suboran Originally by: N'irrti new fitting screen is crappy at best :/ shiny and blinky but nowhere near practical i think it sucks, to large and unpracticle use of space, why have a big hole in the middle? So you can see your ship of course
Dahak2150 Rowdy Ramblers	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:05:00 - [104] Fitting screen is terrible, and needs a lot more work before it's ready. High on the list of things to fix. 1) It's transparent, I can't read or discern anything. 2) Hard to see what turrets and missile launchers you have mounted. 3) Can only have drone or cargo bay open at one time, not both. Fix this. More stuff, but I'm currently flying in a shuttle so it'll have to wait.
Jalif Black Sinisters Freedom of Elbas	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:06:00 - [105] Originally by: Ruziel Shots of stats for Minmatar Loki and modules: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Loki_Attributes.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Loki_Fitting.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Loki_Prereqs.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Min_Modules_Defensive.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Min_Modules_Electronic.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Min_Modules_Engineering.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Min_Modules_Offensive.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Min_Modules_Propulsion.jpg really confusing tbh. There is no much diffrence between those Modules... well lets what will happen. Im just "BIT" unhappy about dual weapon systems. Well, will see..
Ruziel Minmatar RUN Exploration Corps	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:11:00 - [106] Originally by: Jalif really confusing tbh. There is no much diffrence between those Modules... well lets what will happen. Im just "BIT" unhappy about dual weapon systems. Well, will see.. The modules are definitely not finished.
KISOGOKU	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:12:00 - [107] I cant believe noone asked yet , any info on skill ranks*
Dirk Magnum Royal Hiigaran Navy	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:15:00 - [108] Originally by: KISOGOKU I cant believe noone asked yet , any info on skill ranks* All rank 1 apparently. They require level 5 in some low level prerequisites that any older player will already have, most likely. They also require racial cruiser 5 so that's the only real time sink.
Caiman Graystock Caldari	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:15:00 - [109] Originally by: KISOGOKU I cant believe noone asked yet , any info on skill ranks* rank 1
Dahak2150 Rowdy Ramblers	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:16:00 - [110] Originally by: KISOGOKU I cant believe noone asked yet , any info on skill ranks* Subsystem skills are rank 1, Electronic, Engineering and Defensive are int/mem, Offensive and Propulsion are per/will. Ship skill is rank 5, per/will.
Jaisan Minmatar Alcatraz Inc.	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:18:00 - [111] 1m isk to the first person to provide a screenshot of a wormhole, another 5m isk to the first person to give a screenshot of a Sleeper NPC stingy bastard aren't I screenshots till now, look damn good, only 1/2 left on my download before i can check it out myself
Caiman Graystock Caldari	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:19:00 - [112] Originally by: Jaisan 1m isk to the first person to provide a screenshot of a wormhole, another 5m isk to the first person to give a screenshot of a Sleeper NPC stingy bastard aren't I screenshots till now, look damn good, only 1/2 left on my download before i can check it out myself Neither are on the server yet
Jaisan Minmatar Alcatraz Inc.	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:20:00 - [113] no worries, good to have some unknowns to find out on March 10th
Baihuigau Gallente 24th Imperial Crusade	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:21:00 - [114] wormholes dont have any art assets assigned to them yet only a icon.
MotherMoon Huang Yinglong	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:25:00 - [115] Originally by: Jalif Originally by: Ruziel Shots of stats for Minmatar Loki and modules: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Loki_Attributes.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Loki_Fitting.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Loki_Prereqs.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Min_Modules_Defensive.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Min_Modules_Electronic.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Min_Modules_Engineering.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Min_Modules_Offensive.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Ruziel/Min_Modules_Propulsion.jpg really confusing tbh. There is no much diffrence between those Modules... well lets what will happen. Im just "BIT" unhappy about dual weapon systems. Well, will see.. they aren't done yet. and one of those mods adds a turret harpoint and a missle hardpoint. noob.
Dirk Magnum Royal Hiigaran Navy	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:28:00 - [116] Edited by: Dirk Magnum on 09/02/2009 21:30:24 Were there any screenshots of the T3 skill descriptions? What kind of per level bonus do they get, if any? I'm guessing there must be something if it's worth removing SPs from for dying. Also, anyone take a look at those resistance holes (the ones in the defensive module screenshot, not the ship screenshot that lists 0-10% resists for some reason?) Minmatar is majorly gimped against KIN/EXP, as might be expected in exchange for better resists against Amarr lasers. Personally I like that, at least in the case of T3. I wonder if resists are being changed for any non-T3 ships too. Not necessarily sure I'd be as okay with that.
Caiman Graystock Caldari	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:30:00 - [117] Originally by: Dirk Magnum Edited by: Dirk Magnum on 09/02/2009 21:29:20 Were there any screenshots of the T3 skill descriptions? What kind of per level bonus do they get, if any? I'm guessing there must be something if it's worth removing SPs from for dying. Also, anyone take a look at those resistance holes (the ones in the defensive module screenshot, not the ship screenshot that lists 0-10% resists for some reason?) Minmatar is majorly gimped against KIN/EXP, as might be expected in exchange for better resists against Amarr lasers. Personally I like that. I wonder if resists are being changed for any non-T3 ships too. None of the bonuses seem to be described yet.
5pinDizzy	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:33:00 - [118] Originally by: Caiman Graystock http://dl.eve-files.com/media/0902/2009.02.09.19.54.02.jpg Tech 3 Drake?! Omg if true, put this in it's description. "On the last day of mans existence, a single tear is shed. On the last of the Universe, a silent scream unsaid. When all of known reality dies and we're all known as dead. The Tech 3 Drake shall drift on by, not an inch within the red."
Malakai0 M. Corp Mostly Harmless	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:36:00 - [119] Nice the original eve guide I read said willpower was the best stat so I maxed it, with perc being pretty low. Coming up on capital skills I appreciate that! Looks great!
Akor Flandres	Posted - 2009.02.09 21:48:00 - [120] Originally by: 5pinDizzy Originally by: Caiman Graystock http://dl.eve-files.com/media/0902/2009.02.09.19.54.02.jpg Tech 3 Drake?! Not quite... but some of those configs are very sexeh indeed.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.