| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Harisdrop
   |
Posted - 2004.08.05 15:54:00 -
[1]
 Quote:
Final version of cloaking. Smartbombs go back to damaging but not uncloaking cloaked ships within range. Added decloaking wave module support.
Where is it in these two line where the distance of the decloak for object in space?
Right now its 10km is it being reduced ro less or back too 1km???
--------------------------
Garsh ma it soo cool killing people in there space thingies |
Harisdrop
|
Posted - 2004.08.05 15:54:00 -
[2]
Quote:
Final version of cloaking. Smartbombs go back to damaging but not uncloaking cloaked ships within range. Added decloaking wave module support.
Where is it in these two line where the distance of the decloak for object in space?
Right now its 10km is it being reduced ro less or back too 1km???
--------------------------
Garsh ma it soo cool killing people in there space thingies |
Discorporation
|
Posted - 2004.08.05 17:10:00 -
[3]
As far as I know, thare are no smartbombs with a range of 10KM 
[Heterocephalus glaber]
|
Discorporation
|
Posted - 2004.08.05 17:10:00 -
[4]
As far as I know, thare are no smartbombs with a range of 10KM
[Heterocephalus glaber]
|
Harisdrop
|
Posted - 2004.08.05 18:44:00 -
[5]
Dis are you suggesting they are returning it to 1km???
--------------------------
Garsh ma it soo cool killing people in there space thingies |
Harisdrop
|
Posted - 2004.08.05 18:44:00 -
[6]
Dis are you suggesting they are returning it to 1km???
--------------------------
Garsh ma it soo cool killing people in there space thingies |
BH Valar
|
Posted - 2004.08.05 19:26:00 -
[7]
The range is being reduced to 1km, you can test the changes on chaos.
|
BH Valar
|
Posted - 2004.08.05 19:26:00 -
[8]
The range is being reduced to 1km, you can test the changes on chaos.
|
flummox
|
Posted - 2004.08.05 20:47:00 -
[9]
awesome...!
there is a fine, but dissasterous line between a fart and a shart. i suggest you make sure which side you want to be on... |
flummox
|
Posted - 2004.08.05 20:47:00 -
[10]
awesome...!
there is a fine, but dissasterous line between a fart and a shart. i suggest you make sure which side you want to be on... |
Qlippothia
|
Posted - 2004.08.05 22:03:00 -
[11]
Originally by: BH Valar
The range is being reduced to 1km, you can test the changes on chaos.
The decision to change it back was mentioned some time ago. The devs were quick to nerf cloaks after they came out, but have been slow to reverse it now that they have decided that it was fine as it was. Putting the change on Chaos does us no good. Putting back on Tranquility, where we actually play, will. Originally by: "Dev Blog: Tranquility, patch and proposed cloaking"
The current hotfix of 10Km decloaking range would of course be reverted. Good thing is we don't need a client patch for this, we can do a server update in the scheduled downtime, after it's been through QA.
That was a month ago. And I have since read (unable to find source) that it was decided to do nothing and let those who use smartbombs in Empire suffer the consequnces. If this is really the case, then this could have been reverted in *any interim downtime* between the decission to do so and now. So why are we still waiting?
|
Qlippothia
|
Posted - 2004.08.05 22:03:00 -
[12]
Originally by: BH Valar
The range is being reduced to 1km, you can test the changes on chaos.
The decision to change it back was mentioned some time ago. The devs were quick to nerf cloaks after they came out, but have been slow to reverse it now that they have decided that it was fine as it was. Putting the change on Chaos does us no good. Putting back on Tranquility, where we actually play, will. Originally by: "Dev Blog: Tranquility, patch and proposed cloaking"
The current hotfix of 10Km decloaking range would of course be reverted. Good thing is we don't need a client patch for this, we can do a server update in the scheduled downtime, after it's been through QA.
That was a month ago. And I have since read (unable to find source) that it was decided to do nothing and let those who use smartbombs in Empire suffer the consequnces. If this is really the case, then this could have been reverted in *any interim downtime* between the decission to do so and now. So why are we still waiting?
|
Fritz Ionar
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 09:33:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Qlippothia
And I have since read (unable to find source) that it was decided to do nothing and let those who use smartbombs in Empire suffer the consequnces.
Wasn't it the other way around? Let thous who cloak take the consequences, ei. if your hurt by a smartbomb while cloaked concord won't protect you.
That's what I thought... might be wrong thoug?
------------------------------------------
The services YOU need, WE provide! |
Fritz Ionar
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 09:33:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Qlippothia
And I have since read (unable to find source) that it was decided to do nothing and let those who use smartbombs in Empire suffer the consequnces.
Wasn't it the other way around? Let thous who cloak take the consequences, ei. if your hurt by a smartbomb while cloaked concord won't protect you.
That's what I thought... might be wrong thoug?
------------------------------------------
The services YOU need, WE provide! |
JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 11:43:00 -
[15]
Edited by: JoCool on 06/08/2004 11:45:30
Who in his right mind would fly a 130million isk ship into smartbomb range with a 4% insurance? 
If you're talking about cloaks for normal ships, well yes that's possible. But once you warp in and disappear at once the empire npc hunter should be warned right ahead. An official news message like the sentry guns had should be enough and avoid 99% of the grief.
|
JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 11:43:00 -
[16]
Edited by: JoCool on 06/08/2004 11:45:30
Who in his right mind would fly a 130million isk ship into smartbomb range with a 4% insurance?
If you're talking about cloaks for normal ships, well yes that's possible. But once you warp in and disappear at once the empire npc hunter should be warned right ahead. An official news message like the sentry guns had should be enough and avoid 99% of the grief.
|
lickspittle
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 12:45:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Qlippothia
Originally by: BH Valar
The range is being reduced to 1km, you can test the changes on chaos.
The decision to change it back was mentioned some time ago. The devs were quick to nerf cloaks after they came out, but have been slow to reverse it now that they have decided that it was fine as it was. Putting the change on Chaos does us no good. Putting back on Tranquility, where we actually play, will. Originally by: "Dev Blog: Tranquility, patch and proposed cloaking"
The current hotfix of 10Km decloaking range would of course be reverted. Good thing is we don't need a client patch for this, we can do a server update in the scheduled downtime, after it's been through QA.
That was a month ago. And I have since read (unable to find source) that it was decided to do nothing and let those who use smartbombs in Empire suffer the consequnces. If this is really the case, then this could have been reverted in *any interim downtime* between the decission to do so and now. So why are we still waiting?
Because it is a change that needs to come out in a patch. Like the upcoming Castor one. It was not possible or desired that this change come out as a hotfix.
-- Richard
CCP Programmer. Anything said above is not the official line, but my own take or opinion. |
lickspittle
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 12:45:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Qlippothia
Originally by: BH Valar
The range is being reduced to 1km, you can test the changes on chaos.
The decision to change it back was mentioned some time ago. The devs were quick to nerf cloaks after they came out, but have been slow to reverse it now that they have decided that it was fine as it was. Putting the change on Chaos does us no good. Putting back on Tranquility, where we actually play, will. Originally by: "Dev Blog: Tranquility, patch and proposed cloaking"
The current hotfix of 10Km decloaking range would of course be reverted. Good thing is we don't need a client patch for this, we can do a server update in the scheduled downtime, after it's been through QA.
That was a month ago. And I have since read (unable to find source) that it was decided to do nothing and let those who use smartbombs in Empire suffer the consequnces. If this is really the case, then this could have been reverted in *any interim downtime* between the decission to do so and now. So why are we still waiting?
Because it is a change that needs to come out in a patch. Like the upcoming Castor one. It was not possible or desired that this change come out as a hotfix.
-- Richard
CCP Programmer. Anything said above is not the official line, but my own take or opinion. |
Albus
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 13:16:00 -
[19]
So which action was taken in the end?
Do invisible people take the consequences of being invisible, or are innocent smart-bomb using people punished for being unaware of invisible people?
|
Albus
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 13:16:00 -
[20]
So which action was taken in the end?
Do invisible people take the consequences of being invisible, or are innocent smart-bomb using people punished for being unaware of invisible people?
|
Harisdrop
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 16:54:00 -
[21]
YOu use smartbomb at your own risk in empire space. You hit someone concord comes and cleans up your act for you!!!
--------------------------
Garsh ma it soo cool killing people in there space thingies |
Harisdrop
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 16:54:00 -
[22]
YOu use smartbomb at your own risk in empire space. You hit someone concord comes and cleans up your act for you!!!
--------------------------
Garsh ma it soo cool killing people in there space thingies |
Cruz
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 20:07:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Discorporation
As far as I know, thare are no smartbombs with a range of 10KM
there are
................. |
Cruz
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 20:07:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Discorporation
As far as I know, thare are no smartbombs with a range of 10KM
there are
................. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |