Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
101. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Vincent Gaines wrote: I don't have a way to check this fit, but how does a triage mix fit work out? (2 shield, 2 armor) Under on CPU (96.4%), 111% of powergrid. The powergrid is over by 81K MW. But it's a fit that no-one's going to use o...
- by Svennig - at 2011.11.10 19:57:00
|
102. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Tallest wrote: Update: Nidhoggur: * 7,5% bonus to armor and shield transfer amount per carrier level instead of 5%. * +30000 PG * +2500 capacitor capacity (recharge time will be changed to have same base recharge.) Hi Tallest, Love ...
- by Svennig - at 2011.11.10 18:07:00
|
103. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: New Tech2 modules - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Joinin the call, T2 triage is worthless as it stands. Make the bonus something useful: they can rep sieged dreads. That would shake the capital game up a bit.
- by Svennig - at 2011.11.08 09:33:00
|
104. Sticky:New dev blog: Starbase happy fun time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP: Fuel pellets are a good idea, although I agree with the statements here that faction towers are nerfed and build times need to be slashed unless you want no slots anywhere. I'd also like you to take some time to think about another ship c...
- by Svennig - at 2011.11.07 17:23:00
|
105. Sticky:New dev blog: Beauty hides in the shadows - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Awesome work.
- by Svennig - at 2011.11.01 16:57:00
|
106. Sticky:New dev blog: Hybrid weapon and Tech II ammo balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Haulin Aussie wrote: Large hybrid ammo is also way too many m3 compared to others. could this be looked at too please? not empty quoting.
- by Svennig - at 2011.10.31 22:02:00
|
107. Mass-test feedback - October 20 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 64 Bit CPU: Phenom II x4 3.2G GPU: Radeon 6850, latest drivers RAM:8gb Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 2, one TQ one Duality. Graphic setting of the client ...
- by Svennig - at 2011.10.21 09:29:00
|
108. Duality update problem - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
<3 Habakuk
- by Svennig - at 2011.10.20 13:29:00
|
109. Duality update problem - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I'm trying to update duality for the mass test tonight. I made a fresh copy of the TQ client and tried to update using sisilauncher, got the following error: PackageUnavailableError: http://cdn1.eveonline.com/test/RepairData_263924.dat
- by Svennig - at 2011.10.20 10:17:00
|
110. WTS Freighter/hulk/orca/carrier pilot. only need books for JFs. JDC 5. 8b! - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Character transfer email recieved, many thanks :)
- by Svennig - at 2011.10.20 09:06:00
|
111. WTS Freighter/hulk/orca/carrier pilot. only need books for JFs. JDC 5. 8b! - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Details sent
- by Svennig - at 2011.10.20 06:56:00
|
112. WTS Freighter/hulk/orca/carrier pilot. only need books for JFs. JDC 5. 8b! - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
ISK Sent. Character transfer will wait until I have a free slot available. Cus, y'know, I'm ******** like that.
- by Svennig - at 2011.10.19 18:23:00
|
113. Sticky:CCP Focuses on EVE Universe - A CCP Announcement - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Love to all those at CCP. I'm glad to see this refocus, and I'm looking forward to seeing Incarna and WoD when the time is right. To all those who lost their jobs, I'm sorry for the hardship you may have to go through, and I wish you all the best.
- by Svennig - at 2011.10.19 15:08:00
|
114. WTS Freighter/hulk/orca/carrier pilot. only need books for JFs. JDC 5. 8b! - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Remaps?
- by Svennig - at 2011.10.19 08:37:00
|
115. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Tallest wrote: In this thread, I've read several very good reasons why the fighter change is a bad idea. You are right. Fighters should stay the way they are. The change would be unfair for carriers. The poor performance of Minmatar capita...
- by Svennig - at 2011.10.11 13:27:00
|
116. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Obsidian Hawk wrote: Ok so here is a tl;dr of the first 32 pages. 11. Finally to the devs - BEFORE YOU IMPLEMENT THIS , please post a second dev blog about community suggestions on these changes and talk more with us about what changes w...
- by Svennig - at 2011.10.11 01:51:00
|
117. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Baron vonDoom wrote: Don't nerf fighters - they're fine. Gonna keep quoting the truth until someone at CCP recognises it. Might be here a while
- by Svennig - at 2011.10.11 00:02:00
|
118. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
August Hayek wrote: good nerf, but please: 1. buff dreads --> 20% more tank, better tracking 2. buff carriers --> 20% more tank, more fuel bay 3. let fighters as they are now, with the nerf they get somewhat useless CCP, do this.
- by Svennig - at 2011.10.10 23:36:00
|
119. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Raid'En wrote: ovenproofjet wrote: You kinda just nerfed the standard carrier there with the change to the fighter sensor res, carriers are gonna have trouble doing what you say here: "If you want to deal with sub-capitals, you should bring...
- by Svennig - at 2011.10.10 17:41:00
|
120. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Cedric deBouilard wrote: Quote: Fighters Increase signature resolution to 400 that's x4 increase from 100 to 400. isn't that a bit too much? 250-300 is ok. but 400 is overkill. Yeah this is a little extreme. It relegates fighte...
- by Svennig - at 2011.10.10 17:24:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |