Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
rhygos
Progressive State State Section 9
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:24:00 -
[61] - Quote
You're fukin da whole game! |
Cass Lie
State War Academy Caldari State
67
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:26:00 -
[62] - Quote
mynnna wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Caitlyn Tufy wrote:mynnna wrote:Drake's going to be a bit tough to fit as people "expect" to be able to fit one. Guess they'll have to just man up and think outside the double LSE box. With increased speed and velocity bonus, it just screams PODLA to me. Not an accident What the heck is PODLA? PODLA drake is a nanoed version meant for heavy duty kiting (in the pre Tier 3 BC age). A soon-to-be colleague of yours has a fit. |
Vilnius Zar
Ordo Ardish
834
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:28:00 -
[63] - Quote
Initial gut reply: "goodbye balance, hello OP bullshit." after reading the proposed ideas: "hmm, interesting, not overpowered but actually a sidestep rather than a direct upgrade"
I approve.
- edit -
Some will be used more than others; like that drake for instance (as mentioned above), the Brutix and Harb I'm not so sure about. Amat victoria curam. Excellence in everything.
Some guides that may be useful to you: http://www.youtube.com/user/OrdoArdish |
Ager Agemo
Imperial Collective
261
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:30:00 -
[64] - Quote
ZOMG that Drake! *-* screams Flexibility on a leven never before seem!
just 1 more thing... cannot modify the bonus to affect rapid fire launchers too, pretty please...*-* |
m3talc0re X
Solar Revolutions Co.
130
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:31:00 -
[65] - Quote
CCP finally makes navy battlecruisers. Kleenex stock jumps 50 points today... |
S1dy
Haha Corporation
10
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:31:00 -
[66] - Quote
I have the strange feeling that CCP is missing the consistency in this Navy Battlecruisers. There should be Prophecy, Brutix, Ferox and Cyclone as faction variants. That would correlate with the NPC Faction Ships in Missions/Anomalies/Sites/Belts/where ever else. I've never seen a Navy Drake in any NPC fleet...
And while I'm at the critics, it's really lame to take the old Hurricane and implement it as the new Navy variant, really innovative... At least you did a better job with the other 3 Battlecruisers |
Aiko Hanomaa
State War Academy Caldari State
20
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:31:00 -
[67] - Quote
I think I came a little. |
The Sinister
SKUNKWORKZ STRATEGIC SERVICES Fuzzy Nut Attack Squirrels
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:32:00 -
[68] - Quote
I am a bit confused here:
Scythe Fleet Issue: this is our attempt to redeem the old Minmatar tradition of split weapon systems. Instead of forcing two separate weapon types this ship has a choice between two equally valid weapon options. It has been changed to have 5 launchers and 5 turrets, with a 10% bonus to medium projectile turret rate of fire and 10% bonus to missile damage per level. Since these bonuses have twice the strength of the bonuses the ship would receive normally, it effectively has four weapon bonuses, two of which can be used at a time. This will allow the Fleet Scythe to have an exceptional element of surprise as opponents will never know what to expect until they see the ship arrive on the field of battle.
Mentions 5 Launchers or 5 Turrets yet in this other forum says diferent.
Scythe Fleet Issue: This is my attempt to redeem the Minmatar split weapons tradition. Instead of forcing both weapon systems it gives both as viable choices. Cruiser skill bonuses: 10% bonus to Medium Projectile Turret rate of fire 10% bonus to Missile damage Slot layout: 5(-1) H, 5(+1) M, 5(+2) L, 4(+1) Turrets, 4(+1) Launchers Fittings: 745 PWG, 400(+125) CPU Defense (shields / armor / hull) : 2400(+1000) / 1950(+910) / 1950(+730) Shield Recharge Time: 1250s(-100) Capacitor (amount / recharge rate / average cap per second): 1275(+213) / 425s(+43.75) / 3(+0.2) Mobility (max velocity / agility / mass / align time): 280(+10) / 0.44 / 10910000 / 6.65s Drones (bandwidth / bay): 25 / 25 Targeting (max targeting range / Scan Resolution / Max Locked targets): 50km(+12.5) / 345 / 7 Sensor strength: 16(+3) Ladar Signature radius: 90 Cargo capacity: 440
Was that a mistake? |
BeanBagKing
Aperture Harmonics K162
229
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:33:00 -
[69] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Yea could you explain why other factions bc will be equivalent of tier2 and only Gallente have tier1 not tier2, there has be a reason ? What are these tiers you speak of? Some relic of a bygone age lost to time? Im used to tiers, it will take some time for me get used to the new clasification. So is there a reason ? We went with the ships we considered to be the most "iconic" BCs for each race. There was lots of internal debate about Brutix vs Myrm but Brutix won out.
Wha?!? How is that even a contest :( The myrm is -clearly- the most iconic battlecruiser in the Gallente line up. I'm not angry though CCP, just dissapinted in all of you :( |
|
CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
5215
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:34:00 -
[70] - Quote
The Sinister wrote:I am a bit confused here:
Scythe Fleet Issue: this is our attempt to redeem the old Minmatar tradition of split weapon systems. Instead of forcing two separate weapon types this ship has a choice between two equally valid weapon options. It has been changed to have 5 launchers and 5 turrets, with a 10% bonus to medium projectile turret rate of fire and 10% bonus to missile damage per level. Since these bonuses have twice the strength of the bonuses the ship would receive normally, it effectively has four weapon bonuses, two of which can be used at a time. This will allow the Fleet Scythe to have an exceptional element of surprise as opponents will never know what to expect until they see the ship arrive on the field of battle.
Mentions 5 Launchers or 5 Turrets yet in this other forum says diferent.
Scythe Fleet Issue: This is my attempt to redeem the Minmatar split weapons tradition. Instead of forcing both weapon systems it gives both as viable choices. Cruiser skill bonuses: 10% bonus to Medium Projectile Turret rate of fire 10% bonus to Missile damage Slot layout: 5(-1) H, 5(+1) M, 5(+2) L, 4(+1) Turrets, 4(+1) Launchers Fittings: 745 PWG, 400(+125) CPU Defense (shields / armor / hull) : 2400(+1000) / 1950(+910) / 1950(+730) Shield Recharge Time: 1250s(-100) Capacitor (amount / recharge rate / average cap per second): 1275(+213) / 425s(+43.75) / 3(+0.2) Mobility (max velocity / agility / mass / align time): 280(+10) / 0.44 / 10910000 / 6.65s Drones (bandwidth / bay): 25 / 25 Targeting (max targeting range / Scan Resolution / Max Locked targets): 50km(+12.5) / 345 / 7 Sensor strength: 16(+3) Ladar Signature radius: 90 Cargo capacity: 440
Was that a mistake?
Yup that's a typo in the blog. 4 is correct. Game Designer | Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie |
|
|
The Sinister
SKUNKWORKZ STRATEGIC SERVICES Fuzzy Nut Attack Squirrels
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:35:00 -
[71] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:The Sinister wrote:I am a bit confused here:
Scythe Fleet Issue: this is our attempt to redeem the old Minmatar tradition of split weapon systems. Instead of forcing two separate weapon types this ship has a choice between two equally valid weapon options. It has been changed to have 5 launchers and 5 turrets, with a 10% bonus to medium projectile turret rate of fire and 10% bonus to missile damage per level. Since these bonuses have twice the strength of the bonuses the ship would receive normally, it effectively has four weapon bonuses, two of which can be used at a time. This will allow the Fleet Scythe to have an exceptional element of surprise as opponents will never know what to expect until they see the ship arrive on the field of battle.
Mentions 5 Launchers or 5 Turrets yet in this other forum says diferent.
Scythe Fleet Issue: This is my attempt to redeem the Minmatar split weapons tradition. Instead of forcing both weapon systems it gives both as viable choices. Cruiser skill bonuses: 10% bonus to Medium Projectile Turret rate of fire 10% bonus to Missile damage Slot layout: 5(-1) H, 5(+1) M, 5(+2) L, 4(+1) Turrets, 4(+1) Launchers Fittings: 745 PWG, 400(+125) CPU Defense (shields / armor / hull) : 2400(+1000) / 1950(+910) / 1950(+730) Shield Recharge Time: 1250s(-100) Capacitor (amount / recharge rate / average cap per second): 1275(+213) / 425s(+43.75) / 3(+0.2) Mobility (max velocity / agility / mass / align time): 280(+10) / 0.44 / 10910000 / 6.65s Drones (bandwidth / bay): 25 / 25 Targeting (max targeting range / Scan Resolution / Max Locked targets): 50km(+12.5) / 345 / 7 Sensor strength: 16(+3) Ladar Signature radius: 90 Cargo capacity: 440
Was that a mistake? Yup that's a typo in the blog. 4 is correct.
God Damit man i was having a hard on with that one you completely ruined my day LOL
|
Lord Fudo
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
42
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:36:00 -
[72] - Quote
Mascha Tzash wrote:Why not a Nyrmidon? Why a "Nrutix"?
It would be so much easyer to talk about it. 1. Nutrix looks better. 2. Nutrix sounds better. 3. CCP will redesign the Myrim hull to be non-vertical eventually. So navy version doesnt make sense at this time. |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8601
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:36:00 -
[73] - Quote
Thelonious Blake wrote:Gallente should have navy faction Myrmidon instead of Brutix.
That would tread on the toes of the Guristas BC Please vote for me for CSM8-áhere
My recommended voting list |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8601
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:39:00 -
[74] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Drake's going to be a bit tough to fit as people "expect" to be able to fit one. Guess they'll have to just man up and think outside the double LSE box.
It's not a Drake, it's a cerb with good Alpha Please vote for me for CSM8-áhere
My recommended voting list |
The Sinister
SKUNKWORKZ STRATEGIC SERVICES Fuzzy Nut Attack Squirrels
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:47:00 -
[75] - Quote
Also i would like to point out that this is a lie.
Since these bonuses have twice the strength of the bonuses the ship would receive normally, it effectively has four weapon bonuses, two of which can be used at a time.
Its actually 3 bonuses a Double bonus to turrets and a single bonus to Launchers because THIS is not a double bonus:
10% bonus to missile damage per level.
That bonus with 4 launchers its not a viable missile boat. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13532
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:49:00 -
[76] - Quote
Mascha Tzash wrote:Why not a Nyrmidon? Why a "Nrutix"?
It would be so much easyer to talk about it. Federal navy brutix GÇö so it's a Frutix (fruitix?), obviously. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |
Razul Ora'mac
Amarrian Special Forces Angel Causalities Demolition Crew
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:57:00 -
[77] - Quote
A white Harb with black rally stripes... killing stuff in style...
Ps. brb, gotta run ALL the missions for that much LP... |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8601
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:59:00 -
[78] - Quote
Marcel Devereux wrote:How about making all the navy ships FW only? It would give FW something special other than the current faction BS and datacores.
With those LP costs, very few people are going to be making them with non-FW LP Please vote for me for CSM8-áhere
My recommended voting list |
Ravcharas
GREY COUNCIL Nulli Secunda
223
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:03:00 -
[79] - Quote
So the old cane was priced at one sixth it's game design value? |
wallenbergaren
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
71
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:19:00 -
[80] - Quote
Is there a mistake with the LP store prices? It says the FW one is 125k LP + 10m while the regular store is 250k LP + 100m |
|
Din Chao
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
205
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:27:00 -
[81] - Quote
Oh well, my dreams of a turret Drake dashed again... |
ctx2007
Wychwood and Wells Beer needs you
282
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:29:00 -
[82] - Quote
Thank you very much the improvement to the Cerberus and the birth of the Navy drake You only-árealise you life has been a waste of time, when you wake up dead. |
tofucake prime
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
80
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:55:00 -
[83] - Quote
Filled gap between cruiser and battleship
Didn't fill gap between frigate and cruiser
#NavyDestroyers2013 |
Anabella Rella
Gradient Electus Matari
593
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:57:00 -
[84] - Quote
So, your great innovation for a Minmatar navy BC variant is to:
- Resurrect the pre-nerf 'Cane (sort of)
- Slap a hideous camo paintjob on it
- Price it at 3x-4x what a standard issue 'Cane costs
Is that about it? Wow, color me underwhelmed.
What you want is irrelevant, what you've chosen is at hand. |
Lili Lu
726
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:02:00 -
[85] - Quote
Navy Drake
You finally did it . . . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPfcim_p38w |
Nessa Aldeen
The Sword and The Shield
14
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:30:00 -
[86] - Quote
As much as I like the idea of Navy BCs, I must protest your logic regarding the Myrmidon. The Brutix already (as stated by others) has 3 iterations, the original, the useless Eos, and the Astarte. Now, you're adding the fourth. Another brawler ..oh dear.
The Myrmidon should be in there simply because all the other factions had their version upgraded from the current stable. The Myrmidon was iconic for a good while before you nerfed it to hell and back. Your logic sets the Gallente BC line as an orphan. Do you want to create an OLIVER TWIST?
If you do decide to change your minds, bring the Myrmidon back to its full glory - and with more buff (drones! and guns!). The Cane has got to have something more too, as is it doesn't seem on par with the rest... or maybe you have something else you're not telling us.
Another thing, is the ridiculous amount of LP for non-FW. 250k LP and 100kk is stupid. How does making FW store so ridiculously cheap at 50% less and 10kk (10 percent as opposed to standard store) make any damn sense? Farming FW is already so bloody easy these days as opposed to the grind in hi sec LP stores. All it does is make FW LP farming even more rampant than it already is. If you have to make it fair, bring it in line to a more logical level. 125k LP, 50 kk at the very least.
The new and improved line of the first Navy cruisers e.g. Augoror I really like as they've been abandoned for such a long time.
And finally my last comment, which has no bearing on the blog, for the love of EvE, please fix the Moa, Imicus and the Dominix models. These three are the godamn ugliest ships since 2004, a time when your spaceship designers were taking too much LSD and came out with these three misshapen monsters.
Overall, this blog is quite epic but I am more worried about the BS TEAR-cide than anything else |
I Love Boobies
All Hail Boobies
420
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:44:00 -
[87] - Quote
I wonder what their plans for the pirate factions, for example, the Rattlesnake and so on. *removed inappropriate signature* - CCP Eterne |
Indahmawar Fazmarai
1467
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:44:00 -
[88] - Quote
The Navy Harby color scheme is quite sexy... but, 200 million for the old Hurricane? Cm'on. The Greater Fool Bar-áis now open for business, 24/7. Come and have drinks and fun somewhere between RL and New Eden!-áIngame chat channel: The Greater Fool Bar |
Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
148
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:55:00 -
[89] - Quote
I look forward to the new/old cane. Though the LP seems rather steep. |
Stags4
Caucasian Culture Club Transmission Lost
6
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:56:00 -
[90] - Quote
I was looking forward to a Navy Myrmidon, but it seems we will be getting another Brutix brawler? This makes sense how? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |