| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Dream Five
Renegade Pleasure Androids
413
   |
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
I've formulated my understanding of how and why CODE operates and would like to propose a petition to
1) Permanently ban all their leadership
2) Establish new guidelines for how player post-gank humiliation is unacceptable behavior in EVE
The reasons for this are:
I believe that they gank for player humiliation (not profit) and it's their primary goal.
This belief is based on them contacting players repeatedly after they ganked them even after they told them that they don't want their permit.
a) Posting their "tears" publically on their website, almost daily (see minerbumping.com), including frequently information that is highly derogatory and came from a player that is angry over a loss of their spaceship
b) Rubbing it in after the gank, repeated convos to players who are already outraged over the loss of their spaceship
c) Attempts to get them on voice comms, record their rage and publish it on soundcloud/youtube
b) They gank completely empty freighters
e) They repeatedly try to sell permits to people who already repeatedly said no at least 20 times
f) After they sell their permits they revoke it based on being AFK in station, so the permits are not designed for profit but for player griefing because it's impossible to comply with the terms of the "permit"
g) If you read their website you can see that James 315 is a sick self aggrandizing individual
h) You can see that CCP has failed thus far to ban them because they don't quite see through their sickly disguised roleplay what they are really doing
Therefore I believe that these people or at least their leadership is basically a group of sick individuals who derive pleasure primarily from their victims' suffering and need out of game psychiatric help. We as players are not qualified to give them this help and neither is CCP. In the meantime the game would be better off without them. Let's play with respect and make EVE a better place where pirates seek profits and not player humiliation.
Please +1 if you feel the same way.
Also whenever you get contacted by them for post gank or with an offer to buy a permit, petition them to CCP for humiliation using the factual rationale provided above.
Note that this is not about highsec ganking, it's about this group of sick individuals who basically use EVE for griefing and derive pleasure from it.
At this point i feel like any compromise such as them "fixing up" their behavior is unacceptable and they need to be permanently banned from the game. Minerbumping.com needs to be shut down and these players who unfortunately can't behave in a respectful way expunged from the EVE gaming community.
(There are other issues with actual game mechanics that are questionable, such as bumping to get ready in position and the victim being unable to do anything about it and the fact that people can use 40 ISBoxed thrashers. Neither of those things seem quite right but i can see how people can disagree on that.)
|
Max Greed
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
lulz
|
Dream Five
Renegade Pleasure Androids
413
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
reserved |
Noriko Mai
1555
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:28:00 -
[4] - Quote
reserved |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5832
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
if you feel humiliated by code, that speaks volumes more about you than anything els.
Edit: RABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLERABLE!
Edit 2: just finished reading the whole op HA!
=]I[= |
Hengle Teron
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
2588
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
Can I haz your stuff ? |
Iain Cariaba
537
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:31:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dream Five wrote:tl;dr Butthurt whine thread about CODE. #227,401
You forgot to add a tl;dr, so I provided one for you.
You've gotta love CODE. for their ability to generate tears.
EvE is hard. It's harder if you're stupid. |
Almethea
Trans Stellar Express
171
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:31:00 -
[8] - Quote
LOL, welcome in EVE! you must be new?
just for info +/-90% of player base are sociopath and ccp approve. deal with it?
WTS BPO : https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=307169 |
Paranoid Loyd
2310
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
"PvE in EVE is a trap to turn you into PvP content, don't confuse it for actual gameplay." Lipbite |
Zimm Hakkar
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:33:00 -
[10] - Quote
Rabble
. |
|
|
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5832
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:37:00 -
[11] - Quote
Almethea wrote:LOL, welcome in EVE! you must be new?
just for info +/-90% of player base are sociopath and ccp approve. deal with it?
playing the predator in the one game that explicitly and infamously has allowed it for over a decade dose not indicate a psychological disorder.
Difficulty disassociating moral value responses from digital acts on the other hand...
=]I[= |
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
4922
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:38:00 -
[12] - Quote
Buy your lifetime CODE protection passes here! For a mere 100mil you will never have to worry about code ever again!
Special ISBoxer offer: Cheaper in the dozen! 12 accounts for just 1 bil.
Get it while it's hot!
Sovereignty and Population
New Mining Mechanics |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5832
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:39:00 -
[13] - Quote
Paranoid Loyd wrote:Edit: Lol, I just saw why you are whining, two freighters in one day, how dumb can you be?
lol, that wasn't even code it was Marmite!
=]I[= |
Paranoid Loyd
2310
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:41:00 -
[14] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Paranoid Loyd wrote:Edit: Lol, I just saw why you are whining, two freighters in one day, how dumb can you be? lol, that wasn't even code it was Marmite!
Nah, search corp, it was yesterday.
"PvE in EVE is a trap to turn you into PvP content, don't confuse it for actual gameplay." Lipbite |
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
6861
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:42:00 -
[15] - Quote
Paranoid Loyd wrote:Edit: Lol, I just saw why you are whining, two freighters in one day!?! #Slowlearner
OP should just Biomass now to avoid further humiliation.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5832
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:43:00 -
[16] - Quote
Paranoid Loyd wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Paranoid Loyd wrote:Edit: Lol, I just saw why you are whining, two freighters in one day, how dumb can you be? lol, that wasn't even code it was Marmite! Nah, search corp, it was yesterday.
ah got it.
*Uedama*
no excuse.
=]I[= |
Commentus Nolen
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:44:00 -
[17] - Quote
Well at least this will liven up the forums this Saturday. |
Silverdaddy
Ourapheh Holdings
25
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:44:00 -
[18] - Quote
I was kinda surprised that they have moved on from actions against AFK miners to possing autopiloting shuttles, but whatever.
I refuse to feed the trolls, so I just shrugged-off my loss and moved on.
The problem with slavery is that only half of the manacles are visible. The Holder, supposed master, is equally bound by the gilded chains of privilege and wealth.
Sorrowful is the state of humanity, which shall never be free until all share equally in Liberty.
|
Hengle Teron
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
2589
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:46:00 -
[19] - Quote
IMO they should remove non-profit ganks from low, null and wh as well...
any fleet that loses more than they loot should take a 7 days ban every time that happens |
IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
1279
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:49:00 -
[20] - Quote
Wow....
This reminds me of the guy that told me CCP needs to remove PVP from "his game"
|
|
|
CALDARI CITIZEN 14330909
The Conference Elite
CODE.
513
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 17:54:00 -
[21] - Quote
I am assuming this was a joke... but I don't think it is.
Also regarding the empty freighters, you really should just put stuff in it to prevent that. You know anything.
The Artist Formerly Known As AC.-á
The-áterminal end of the digestive system.-á |
John E Normus
New Order Logistics
CODE.
220
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 18:01:00 -
[22] - Quote
How about we just eliminate the auto-pilot button instead?
Between Ignorance and Wisdom |
PotatoOverdose
Royal Black Watch Highlanders
DARKNESS.
2372
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 18:15:00 -
[23] - Quote
*popcorn* |
Ron Erhlod
Crab Sticks
0
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 18:15:00 -
[24] - Quote
that joke ? yes? |
Black Pedro
Yammerschooner
85
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 18:25:00 -
[25] - Quote
-1
So you want to ban without warning players for engaging in behaviour (Highsec ganking) that has not only been been tolerated for 10+ years, but was explicitly how the game was designed?
Or do you want to ban these players without warning because they trash talk, gloat over a victory - "rubbing it in" as you say, or have at thier own propaganda website like practically every other large player group in Eve?
Or do you want to ban these players without warning because you are licensed mental health professional and have diagnosed these people as an actual threat to society, or at least other players, over the Internet?
I don't even know where to begin. |
Dream Five
Renegade Pleasure Androids
416
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 18:47:00 -
[26] - Quote
CALDARI CITIZEN 14330909 wrote:I am assuming this was a joke... but I don't think it is.
Also regarding the empty freighters, you really should just put stuff in it to prevent that. You know anything.
This is coming from a player who's former name was offensive enough for CCP to rename it . |
Dream Five
Renegade Pleasure Androids
416
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 18:48:00 -
[27] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:-1
So you want to ban without warning players for engaging in behaviour (Highsec ganking) that has not only been been tolerated for 10+ years, but was explicitly how the game was designed?
Or do you want to ban these players without warning because they trash talk, gloat over a victory - "rubbing it in" as you say, or have at thier own propaganda website like practically every other large player group in Eve?
Or do you want to ban these players without warning because you are licensed mental health professional and have diagnosed these people as an actual threat to society, or at least other players, over the Internet?
I don't even know where to begin.
You have a point and each isolated incident is not sufficient. However combined with clearly sociopathic behavior such as recent reposting of death threats on their website with an objective to rub it in and make fun of clearly disturbed individuals. That's not OK and should clearly constitute a violation of reasonable player behavior. |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1687
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 18:52:00 -
[28] - Quote
Dream Five wrote:clearly sociopathic behavior
Naturally, you have the medical qualifications to back this up, yes?
Dream Five wrote:such as recent reposting of death threats on their website with an objective to rub it in and make fun of clearly disturbed individuals. That's not OK and should clearly constitute a violation of reasonable player behavior.
It speaks volumes about you that you think the people reporting the death threats are the ones who should be banned, rather than the ones making the threats.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
Paranoid Loyd
2311
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 18:52:00 -
[29] - Quote
I can't wait to see the article about you. 
"PvE in EVE is a trap to turn you into PvP content, don't confuse it for actual gameplay." Lipbite |
Dream Five
Renegade Pleasure Androids
416
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 18:54:00 -
[30] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Dream Five wrote:clearly sociopathic behavior Naturally, you have the medical qualifications to back this up, yes? Dream Five wrote:such as recent reposting of death threats on their website with an objective to rub it in and make fun of clearly disturbed individuals. That's not OK and should clearly constitute a violation of reasonable player behavior. It speaks volumes about you that you think the people reporting the death threats are the ones who should be banned, rather than the ones making the threats.
Don't twist my words. F for Fail attempt at spindoctoring. I never said that the person who posted it in first place shouldn't be banned. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |