| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 [50] 60 70 80 90 100 |
981. [proposal] ban the use of ISboxer - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
"Vegita, what is their butt-hurt and idiot level?" "It's over 9000!"
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.21 20:57:00
|
982. Feel free to give your opinion about ISboxer - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ellen Thrace wrote: "ISboxer bring more money to CCP" No, ISboxers can make so much ingame ISK that they dont need to use real cash to pay their accounts. This is the biggest myth I see perpetuated about multiboxer. If a multiboxer is runni...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.21 12:33:00
|
983. Hi Resolution Texture Pack - Show Your Support!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why hasn't this happened yet?
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.21 11:27:00
|
984. Was there another big fight tonight causing mass DC's? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: That's right, everyone not involved in null sec cartel wars is a high sec solo player, and their gameplay style is unworthy of discussion, or any sense of equality. I hate to be the one ...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.21 11:26:00
|
985. Why We Should Support Off Grid Boosting - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
maCH'EttE wrote: Getting rid of OGB is gonna get rid of small gang pvp. Its simple as that. Look at it how you want to, say what you want to, its simple as that.. We will see a decline of small gang pvp corps decline. All of eve will be control...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.21 01:58:00
|
986. Eve MultiBoxing allowed : An nice game for cheaters ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cpt Arareb wrote: isboxer that alow you to control 10 ships simultaneosly, is a cheat and gamebreaking imo Got any logic to go with that opinion?
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.20 23:08:00
|
987. Eve MultiBoxing allowed : An nice game for cheaters ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Miilla wrote: Arduemont wrote: Paladin Amarr wrote: Anderson Footman wrote: Paladin Amarr wrote: When this game will favore the honest players ??? Never. I will stop playing the day it does. I think you miss the point. I am t...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.20 22:59:00
|
988. Eve MultiBoxing allowed : An nice game for cheaters ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Paladin Amarr wrote: Anderson Footman wrote: Paladin Amarr wrote: When this game will favore the honest players ??? Never. I will stop playing the day it does. I think you miss the point. I am talking about people using external so...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.20 22:56:00
|
989. Eve MultiBoxing allowed : An nice game for cheaters ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Miilla wrote: Arduemont wrote: Miilla wrote: GreenSeed wrote: whats false is your idea that broadcasting mirrors the action on every client after it "records" in on the first client for fucks sake, i feel like im talking to a thirteen ...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.20 22:54:00
|
990. Eve MultiBoxing allowed : An nice game for cheaters ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Miilla wrote: GreenSeed wrote: whats false is your idea that broadcasting mirrors the action on every client after it "records" in on the first client for fucks sake, i feel like im talking to a thirteen year old. if that were the way multi...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.20 22:53:00
|
991. Eve MultiBoxing allowed : An nice game for cheaters ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Miilla wrote: Arduemont wrote: Miilla wrote: Want me to write it in first order predicate logic? Because it WILL evaluate to True, its a Tautology. Using vague stupid technical terms doesn't make your argument stronger. GǣIf you ca...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.20 22:47:00
|
992. Eve MultiBoxing allowed : An nice game for cheaters ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Miilla wrote: Want me to write it in first order predicate logic? Because it WILL evaluate to True, its a Tautology. Using vague stupid technical terms doesn't make your argument stronger. GǣIf you can't explain it to a six year old, you...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.20 22:45:00
|
993. Eve MultiBoxing allowed : An nice game for cheaters ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Miilla wrote: GreenSeed wrote: Miilla wrote: SO which part of doing an action on N number of accounts "mirrored / echoed automatically aided by a program" over my single handedly sitting at hte computer manual input on the same N accoun...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.20 22:42:00
|
994. Eve MultiBoxing allowed : An nice game for cheaters ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Miilla wrote: SO which part of doing an action on N number of accounts "mirrored / echoed automatically aided by a program" over my single handedly sitting at hte computer manual input on the same N accounts without the aid of a program thus n...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.20 22:34:00
|
995. Eve MultiBoxing allowed : An nice game for cheaters ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Miilla wrote: Lara Dantreb wrote: parallelization of actions = multiboxing serialization of actions = botting if you mine 2 hours with 12 characters and ISBoxer, it's legit if you mine 24 hours with 1 botting character, it's forbidden. res...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.20 22:22:00
|
996. Eve MultiBoxing allowed : An nice game for cheaters ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Oh, for (imaginary) Gods sakes! Give it a rest you idiots. There's nothing wrong with multiboxers. Use your damn brain before you complain about something.
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.20 22:12:00
|
997. Why We Should Support Off Grid Boosting - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If Rorquals aren't realistic as On grid boosters, then CCP needs to make them realistic for on grid boosting. We shouldn't be making suggestions and invulnerable ships. Give them a reinforcement timer if they get attacked whilst deployed or someth...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.20 21:25:00
|
998. How will the war end? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
War between big alliance like this aren't ended when one side runs out of ISK or ships, they end when one side is so depressed with the fighting that their players don't log on any more. Most big wars eventually end when one of the alliances fall ...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.19 01:44:00
|
999. Eve Gate in New Eden - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Everyone has to go see the Eve gate WH at least once. Because its a rather dead end pointless system down there it is a common way of introducing new players to lowsec. Ie, get in a fast ship, don't stop jumping and go visit the Eve gate. There a...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.19 01:35:00
|
1000. CCP, would you let EVE die? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
flakeys wrote: Lord Ryan wrote: EA is ready. SOE .............. Would prefer this to Acitivion, Bioware, Blizzard, or EA. They're doing a fantastic job with PlantSide 2. Kult Altol wrote: Least EA would finish ambulation.....for...
- by Arduemont - at 2013.06.18 22:03:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 [50] 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |