| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. sisi patch - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
There is a workarround for the patch problem here . It's not sticky so it drops from first page frequently. Feel free to bump it.
- by Ausser - at 2009.12.25 06:55:00
|
2. carrier's - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
We got the fuel bay - to compensate for this the cargo was reduced. I had no trouble with cargo capacity till now. For what do we need more cargo? For fitting cargo extenders and rigs to haul stuff arround? The jump frighters do this job well. B...
- by Ausser - at 2009.12.24 08:45:00
|
3. HOWTO just 160MB to patch from TQ-120813 to SISI-121200 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Lt Expendable ((EDITED)) BE WARNED:::: you will probably have to manually patch 119404 to latest, auto patching puts the client back to ver.120813!! Hmm... did you forgotten to start eve.exe with the /server:87.237.38.5...
- by Ausser - at 2009.12.23 04:35:00
|
4. HOWTO just 160MB to patch from TQ-120813 to SISI-121200 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Alex Zander505 i tried to open up the common.ini and change the build and sync but it wont let me change it. it says something how the file cannot be created and check if the file name and path is correct but it wont ever le...
- by Ausser - at 2009.12.22 07:41:00
|
5. HOWTO just 160MB to patch from TQ-120813 to SISI-121200 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ausser on 22/12/2009 02:17:42 Originally by: CCP Atropos That TRANSIENT_ERROR is a BITS error. If you could do me a favour, open a command prompt as administrator, and then type 'bitsadmin /list' This should list any BITS jo...
- by Ausser - at 2009.12.22 02:10:00
|
6. HOWTO just 160MB to patch from TQ-120813 to SISI-121200 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: RoCkEt X Quote: Downloading file replacements... Bits download job in incorrect state, state: TRANSIENT_ERROR Error Level: 2 Log file: C:\Program Files\CCP\EVE - Copy\repairlog.txt repair.exe fails with that error ...
- by Ausser - at 2009.12.21 18:10:00
|
7. HOWTO just 160MB to patch from TQ-120813 to SISI-121200 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I had trouble downloading the full installer (2.7GB @20kB/s = 30h+ download time ). I've found a solution where you only need to download ~160MB to patch from TQ-120813 to SISI-121200. Since there is no native 120813 to 121200 patch out there ...
- by Ausser - at 2009.12.21 16:19:00
|
8. I can't patch. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ausser on 21/12/2009 13:09:08 Is there a torrent out there? Download speed is ~20kB/s from original location. I've allready tried it once, it failed after 18 hours before download completed. Now i have the second try running...
- by Ausser - at 2009.12.21 13:08:00
|
9. Flogged to death, but any news on the cyno effect? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I've voted to get the old effect back a while ago. But meanwhile i like the new one too.
- by Ausser - at 2009.06.02 02:38:00
|
10. The Only Way to Fix Blobbing (But will never happen) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Implementation of line of sight would not remove blobs. Think about fighters/drones. They go where they have to kill something and do it close range. Even with guns it would still be sexy to blob up. You just have to spread arround after warp in...
- by Ausser - at 2009.05.27 23:32:00
|
11. Little Smartbomb/DDD/Bomb revamp - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Dragon Greg Originally by: Ausser A Doomsday Device ignition would not neccecary kill all targets on grid, even if they have less ehp than the effective base damage of the dd device. So there is a chance to survi...
- by Ausser - at 2009.05.27 01:57:00
|
12. Little Smartbomb/DDD/Bomb revamp - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
There have been some issues about smarties and doomsday in other threads. In the citadel hp thread i've suggested a change, which i'll bring in here again for discussion. It's verry simple, low level and without lots of pain for everybody while i...
- by Ausser - at 2009.05.26 22:07:00
|
13. escort carriers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Xodd Hil Part of the underlying idea (small noncap mini-carrier) is a good one, although fairly old. I would rather say that 5 fighters is way too much, maybe 1-2-3. Slot layout is also a bit flawed, overpowered. But yeah, I...
- by Ausser - at 2009.05.26 21:11:00
|
14. The problems with T3 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ausser on 26/05/2009 20:35:16 If we allow them to swap subsystems in space, without the use of maint service from carrier/orca/array, then we also allow to swap modules. That would be far too overpowered, because it's a 'for free' s...
- by Ausser - at 2009.05.26 20:35:00
|
15. CCP visual effec guys.. look at this video and say what is wrong... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I like it. Add ECCM and it looks still cool. I can understand if ppl get headache - but they can turn off effects. No reason to turn it off for everybody. Maybe an option for continuously variable adjustment of the intensity of all the effects w...
- by Ausser - at 2009.05.25 22:04:00
|
16. escort carriers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Mafaka we need to improve existing carriers , not invent new ones i dont like the idea , especially logistics in it , useless skill at all for cap pilot , treiange module only but hey who uses it Hey, the existing carr...
- by Ausser - at 2009.05.25 21:28:00
|
17. escort carriers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Lewyrus Some minnie ships do get shield boost amount bonuses, why the gallente is the only one that gets the 0,5% more local rep amount? This 0.5% asymmetricity is the best idea in this concept. I love it. It makes the s...
- by Ausser - at 2009.05.25 18:14:00
|
18. Sleeper Level AI in mission rats is the day drones are screwed - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The numbers of npc's in mission will not stay the same when ai changes. So no blobbing up npc's and no plex-fitted pve ships to counter them. No need to talk about. Problem with drones is: The drones will be anihilated most time as soon as they s...
- by Ausser - at 2009.05.25 17:54:00
|
19. escort carriers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
LOL - That are really overpowered units. But why not? Let's think about how they could look like so they get enough itchiness to compensate for their overpowered capabilities. These units should not be new t1 hulls. Instead, they coul...
- by Ausser - at 2009.05.25 17:09:00
|
20. Sleeper Level AI in mission rats is the day drones are screwed - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Drones are not a 'Fire and Forget' weapon platform. You need to keep them alive in some cases. If you want something to fly to your target and spank it while you dont need to care about, then try missiles. Nobody would try to repair his missiles ...
- by Ausser - at 2009.05.25 14:24:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |