| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Sticky:Dev blog: Brains! NOM NOM! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
hi, it would be nice to turn ia the tower so that it is adjustable according to choose a strategy. why not also ensure that the sleepers difficulty increases with the presence of players in a wh, eg low presence wh be Class 1, Class 6 strong pres...
- by CeNedra - at 2012.09.25 17:29:00
|
2. R.I.P. V R - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
hi, I join all to send my condolences to his family and all his friends ingame and irl .
- by CeNedra - at 2012.09.12 20:14:00
|
3. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Hi, sorry for my english. Why not give wh, the possibility of undermining the moons? The wh are locked to everywhere, we can not put the station, we can not produce supercaps, we can not claim in the Exploration and is limited
- by CeNedra - at 2012.07.22 11:51:00
|
4. Wormholle and claim - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hi, I just had the idea that it would be nice to have as an anchor mode with POS modules on capital placed in orbit in the pos, This would avoid the accidental bump.
- by CeNedra - at 2012.02.04 08:03:00
|
5. Wormholle and claim - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hi, You are hard, if a small corporation loses 4 or 5 caps and all his property in the destruction of an outpost, this will make it very difficult
- by CeNedra - at 2012.01.28 08:38:00
|
6. Wormholle and claim - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hi, I do not want a station destructible but as in 0.0, but lose the services would retain the overall structure.
- by CeNedra - at 2012.01.24 22:36:00
|
7. Wormholle and claim - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hi, Quote: CCP was worried that the introduction of some sort of wormhole stabilizer would remove some of the everyday safety that people have grown to expect . I disagree because small corporation like ours could not survive, that's why I ...
- by CeNedra - at 2012.01.23 11:32:00
|
8. Wormholle and claim - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hi, Quote: CCP's goal stated everywhere is to disallow wspace colonization ala null and to foster the unknown. They are working on slowly iterating on wspace again by removing the API stats and other things they haven't mentioned. There were e...
- by CeNedra - at 2012.01.23 09:12:00
|
9. Wormholle and claim - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hi, Quote: Aren't WH system supposed to be "hard to live in"? Ouposts, Claiming and stuff would make it a confortable home... I doubt that was the plan tries to refuel four large POS with a vortex that allows only a occator. There is no be...
- by CeNedra - at 2012.01.22 16:23:00
|
10. Wormholle and claim - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
hi I do not want a module to scan for me but to warn of an intrusion, by setting the module possible to our standing in this space must be claim. my reflection revolves around the claim, because I also want caps.Les in to build the super super ca...
- by CeNedra - at 2012.01.21 22:53:00
|
11. Wormholle and claim - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hi, I thought of your second solution for the outpost which also made possible the production hub and other components of sovereignty. I think you'll scream, I would also like it in place ccp modules to scan only for the wormhole, so that we prev...
- by CeNedra - at 2012.01.20 23:09:00
|
12. Wormholle and claim - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hi, I better understand this sentence and you have not saved, I have one hour to translate :p Quote: I had originaly written a 3-4000 letter response to this, but the forums ate it. I can't be arsed to write it all again so I'll just give a f...
- by CeNedra - at 2012.01.19 16:23:00
|
13. Wormholle and claim - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Infrastructure upgrades, yes, but NOT the same as in nullsec, if anything I think they should be deliberatly underpowered and have an element of randomness. Any upgrades like this need to be done very carefully. signatures do not come...
- by CeNedra - at 2012.01.18 19:39:00
|
14. Wormholle and claim - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
kikoo, make, thx
- by CeNedra - at 2012.01.18 17:17:00
|
15. Wormholle and claim - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hi, I'm sorry for my English. I think the coming changes wormhole, the claim and the possibility of opening should be created. the claim should be able to give us as owning a nullsec with a system upgrade that improves the management of resources...
- by CeNedra - at 2012.01.18 17:17:00
|
16. Wormholle and claim - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hi, I'm sorry for my English. I think the coming changes wormhole, the claim and the possibility of opening should be created. the claim should be able to give us as owning a nullsec with a system upgrade that improves the management of resources...
- by CeNedra - at 2012.01.18 16:44:00
|
17. Privet sale - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
agreed
- by CeNedra - at 2010.01.24 19:40:00
|
18. ~ WTA 93M PVP GOD 20b buyout ~ - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Current skills: 228 (skill points: 79,806,257)
- by CeNedra - at 2010.01.20 18:55:00
|
19. ~ WTA 93M PVP GOD 20b buyout ~ - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
bump
- by CeNedra - at 2010.01.20 14:51:00
|
20. ~ WTA 93M PVP GOD 20b buyout ~ - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
cant contact buyers character still for sale
- by CeNedra - at 2010.01.20 10:54:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |