| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Grath Telkin wrote: ClusterFook wrote: The Problem with the thinking T3's are for versatility is that who uses generalized ships? Really, i see tons of people using proteus to tackle and lokis' to web even though they do the job worse tha...
- by ClusterFook - at 2013.06.11 05:39:00
|
2. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The Problem with the thinking T3's are for versatility is that who uses generalized ships? hull + mods for best performance for the job Subsystem + mods for best performance for the job. Both require you to dock up to switch roles. but with t3'...
- by ClusterFook - at 2013.06.10 22:11:00
|
3. Experiences of 10 year eve veteran streaming lowsec Odyssey Exploration - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ran 3 data sites in null today... made about i dunno 20 mil perhaps? only took an hour and a half. Ran 2 sites yesterday made about 4 mil. all while in a defenseless frigate In null sec. SO basically i could make more running lvls twos in high sec...
- by ClusterFook - at 2013.06.06 04:20:00
|
4. Try our new hacking/archaeology sites! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Ran 2 sites in null today for the first time. I have to say i'm rather disappointed. It took about an hour to find these sites and run them. i made about 2 million total if i could be bothered to move that junk to sell. The Mini game is 35% traini...
- by ClusterFook - at 2013.06.05 01:52:00
|
5. POS & POCO raiding, conflict generation and great way to integrate Dust514 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I think they POCO's and POS's with moon mining mods should be raid-able. Attacking forces could take a % of whatever is held inside. This could even be linked up with dusties whom would have to do the raiding. Contracts for raiding and defending c...
- by ClusterFook - at 2013.05.01 00:20:00
|
6. New tech 2 battleship idea, anti-capital - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Serina Tsukaya wrote: There's no point in talking about a new bc or bs bomber or anti cap ship, as they are already fully capable of killing a capital ship in sufficent numbers. Adding a battleship or a battle cruiser JUST for that role would b...
- by ClusterFook - at 2013.01.26 21:24:00
|
7. New tech 2 battleship idea, anti-capital - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Also what about instead of making these a tech two ship, they become either a 4th tier or the current 3rd tier? Could make the weapon skill associated with it 8x to help keep them from proliferating to quickly. Also the reduction in isk cost woul...
- by ClusterFook - at 2013.01.25 02:04:00
|
8. New tech 2 battleship idea, anti-capital - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Just trying to come up with a solution that is both fun, gives small groups a chance to at least compete with super on field, changes the status quo and does not nerf super/titans to the point of uselessness. The main goal here is to allow a sub c...
- by ClusterFook - at 2013.01.25 01:52:00
|
9. New tech 2 battleship idea, anti-capital - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
True Ace wrote: Your idea would be great if you give them a more submarine feel. Since their only weapons only work on caps give them a cloak like stealth bombers. T2 bs already cost an arm and a leg so people cant complain about a cheaper ship...
- by ClusterFook - at 2013.01.24 22:36:00
|
10. New tech 2 battleship idea, anti-capital - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
So we all know the only counter to supers is more supers, but what if we could change that? I had an idea for new tech 2 battleship with a unique weapon system: A weapon system that has damage based off of mass (similar to how explosion radius a...
- by ClusterFook - at 2013.01.24 21:45:00
|
11. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Hybrid Turrets - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Turns out CCP Tallest had twins and is now on paternity leave, as the leader of the re-balance team (there are 3 total) it has been put on the side burner untill he gets back. So i woul not expect ANY hyrbrid/Gallente changes/ re-balance for at le...
- by ClusterFook - at 2012.02.23 00:31:00
|
12. CCP Tallest would love you forever if.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
To be fair if one perosn goes on leave for an extended peroid of time, important parts of the game should not be neglected becuase of it especially when it was a focus for the new expansion, that is poor corporate organization and planning. That s...
- by ClusterFook - at 2012.02.23 00:13:00
|
13. CCP Tallest would love you forever if.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well luckily i've trained into Winmatar (that tornado is nice, wtf is the talos for again?). i remember when there was a dev blog on how unbalance is a good thing to an extent as it keeps poeple training and expereinceing new things in EVE. Guess ...
- by ClusterFook - at 2012.02.22 05:13:00
|
14. CCP Tallest would love you forever if.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
You would give us that Hybrid rebalance update you said you would write by last month! I'm sure your busy guy and maybe you forgot but i know two devs have said they would remind you to write it... CCP Punkturis https://forums.eveonline.com/defa...
- by ClusterFook - at 2012.02.22 01:09:00
|
15. So you want T3 Frigates. Please explain. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xorv wrote: I really dislike the idea that cost becomes a major factor in balance. . I got a huge kick out of that statement. Cost has always been a balancing factor and is what drives ALL conflict in EVE. Why else would poeple fight over i...
- by ClusterFook - at 2012.02.17 07:00:00
|
16. CCP where is your feedback and communication? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ciar Meara wrote: I don't think anyone could write any decent summary in 20 minutes times. Actually i think you can. Because CCP Tallest or whoever is in charge should have an idea how they feel about hybrids, whether they need more work, o...
- by ClusterFook - at 2012.02.16 01:34:00
|
17. CCP where is your feedback and communication? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So we were promised a response in the hybrid rebalance test feedback forum by end of January. In 95 pages there are 3 dev responses, 1 saying we will be getting a dev response. Is this the improved communication you promised us? What are you plann...
- by ClusterFook - at 2012.02.13 00:30:00
|
18. CCP sort this out now!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Now heres an Idea, most in BTL average 100 mil an hour per person in 10 man groups. So get 2 groups run them for 3 hours then give a good merc corp 6 billion to attack them when they start attacking the mom. Honestly if your complaining about this...
- by ClusterFook - at 2012.01.21 04:07:00
|
19. Sticky:CCP Focuses on EVE Universe - A CCP Announcement - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Seewong wrote: leavwiz wrote: perhaps the almost daily client updates and patches since the release of crucible should be sending the message that either you let the wrong people go, or you are still spread too thin to do quality work in eve...
- by ClusterFook - at 2011.12.28 01:35:00
|
20. Foolproof method to prevent the suicide gank - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Actually it is a sound philosophy. Action through non-action, whole Chinese philosohies built around it. Good stuff.
- by ClusterFook - at 2011.12.17 11:46:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |