| Pages: [1] |
1. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T Meh, when you say you want improvements but you want to accomplish them with a nerf, that doesn't exactly go down well. Well I hadn't finished my argument. Originally by: Akita T An actual buff to inven...
- by Elayae - at 2011.01.12 08:12:00
|
2. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 10/01/2011 23:24:38 If most people that invent T2 ammo and charges do so for their own use... well, then I'd chalk that up under "big success" on the invention scoreboard. Yes I agree a...
- by Elayae - at 2011.01.11 09:08:00
|
3. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 10/01/2011 20:41:54 Originally by: Elayae It shows that tech II BPO can easily outproduce the invention method And to repeat myself, that is completely irrelevant. Per manufactur...
- by Elayae - at 2011.01.10 23:17:00
|
4. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T Originally by: Elayae [...]I estimate that around 99,90% of the mass produced tech II items such as mining crystals and ammunition that are available for the market come from tech II blueprint originals[...]T...
- by Elayae - at 2011.01.10 18:04:00
|
5. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T It is wholly irrelevant whether one person or multiple persons do it, only total volumes matter and percentages of those volumes coming from BPOs vs invented BPCs. Yes true, however I estimate that around 99,90% o...
- by Elayae - at 2011.01.10 15:09:00
|
6. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
The OP in this thread has failed to see that mass production of tech II items with blueprint originals in some cases do have a significant advantage over the invention method. The main examples of cases using mass production are mining crystals an...
- by Elayae - at 2011.01.10 12:08:00
|
7. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Elayae Edited by: Elayae on 04/01/2011 15:57:30 Edited by: Elayae on 04/01/2011 13:30:14 Not all tech 2 BPOÆs are unfair in a market and production perspective but there are a few that are, for example the production...
- by Elayae - at 2011.01.05 09:04:00
|
8. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Not all tech 2 BPOÆs are unfair in a market and production perspective but there are a few that are, for example the production of 100 tech II mining crystals of veldspar, scordite, plagioclase, omber or pyroxeres. Tech II BPO *no copy hassle ...
- by Elayae - at 2011.01.04 12:12:00
|
9. Electronic parts - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Yes true, but should this commodity not be producible on planets? We have e.g. consumer electronics, mechanical parts, robotics and miniature electronics which can be produced on planets, so why not electronic parts?
- by Elayae - at 2010.05.29 10:20:00
|
10. Electronic parts - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Hmm seems like a strange question but I cannot find electronic parts in the refined commodities or other planetary products. This basic commodity is much needed in tech II production. Will the electronic parts perhaps be added at a later date?
- by Elayae - at 2010.05.29 07:55:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |