| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 |
141. 18 years is too long - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ModeratedToSilence wrote: Elzon1 wrote: Chribba wrote: 18 years you say... that means I'm halfway there nice! Although last time I checked iirc it was 25+ years... /c Cool 25+ years even longer, doesn't change my argument. And being...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.06.05 09:00:00
|
142. 18 years is too long - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Talon SilverHawk wrote: No I disagree : ) For one thing I'm not halfway there (except in time) as I have taken breaks and been lax with training sometimes. I like the skill system. You train for what you need and when your done move onto to s...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.06.05 08:50:00
|
143. 18 years is too long - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mara Rinn wrote: How do you reduce the time it takes to train skills in general without reducing the time it takes to get to level 5? You do reduce the time it takes to get to level 5 and I see no harm in that overall. Mara Rinn wrote: ...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.06.05 08:40:00
|
144. 18 years is too long - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Chribba wrote: 18 years you say... that means I'm halfway there nice! Although last time I checked iirc it was 25+ years... /c Cool 25+ years even longer, doesn't change my argument. And being halfway done doesn't mean anything in EVE so ...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.06.05 08:33:00
|
145. 18 years is too long - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gerald Taric wrote: Elzon1 wrote: The time it takes to train everything in EVE to it's maximum base potential doesn't seem very sane really. Isn't 18+ years of training a bit much? This was the introductionary sentence of your OP, where...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.06.05 08:29:00
|
146. 18 years is too long - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ivy Romanova wrote: no simply no No one should be great at EVERYTHING that provide the intensive for people to specialize and encourage teamplay instead of being an one man army Having max SP would make you great at NOTHING. SP has nothing ...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.06.05 08:01:00
|
147. 18 years is too long - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Talon SilverHawk wrote: Yey, I'm halfway there. Don't a change a thing. Tal Who cares, SP has got nothing to do with success in EVE so it wouldn't matter even if you would be finished training forever. True skill and experience are ...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.06.05 07:57:00
|
148. 18 years is too long - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Petrus Blackshell wrote: Other than being a capital pilot (which we do not need more of) what takes so long to specialize for that such a drastic solution is needed? It's not so much about specialization that I am concerned with, it's the re...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.06.05 07:50:00
|
149. 18 years is too long - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vera Algaert wrote: you are not supposed to be able to train everything That is not the intention of my post. Vera Algaert wrote: even if characters would reach the 18 years mark CCP would just add some new skills for another few year...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.06.05 07:13:00
|
150. 18 years is too long - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marcus Ichiro wrote: Training everything isn't the point. I wasn't saying it is. Just that it takes too long overall. Marcus Ichiro wrote: The point is that you're supposed to specialise. Indeed, and this change would make that just a...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.06.05 06:58:00
|
151. 18 years is too long - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No More Heroes wrote: But but but :endgame: Look at the post above your's.
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.06.05 06:57:00
|
152. 18 years is too long - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Martin0 wrote: Eve is about specialization. You are NOT supposed to train everything. Did I suggest anyone train all the skills to level V, nope. Was I implying such a thing, nope. All I am after is to reduce the overall time it takes to ...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.06.05 06:56:00
|
153. 18 years is too long - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The time it takes to train everything in EVE to it's maximum base potential doesn't seem very sane really. Isn't 18+ years of training a bit much? Simple suggestion: Take the character with the most SP and add 1 month's worth of SP on top of that...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.06.05 06:48:00
|
154. CSM7 Summit Topic: Null Sec - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: I always welcome new ideas, agree with them or not ideas are always good. It is just negative criticism without proposing ideas that I have a problem with. Cool. I am generally the same. Although on some occasions it migh...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.05.31 23:37:00
|
155. CSM7 Summit Topic: Null Sec - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Just in case it is not too late to add some input, I will add my .02 isk. Most of this stuff is going to be obvious. 1. r32 alchemy as a band aid to the technetium bottleneck problem. Add ring mining or whatever afterwards if that doesn't help t...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.05.31 08:19:00
|
156. Does expensive moons give reason to fight ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Replying once again in a JitaPriceChecker2 fix tech bottleneck thread with an obligatory post about implementing R32 alchemy and possibly adding ring mining afterwards if alchemy is not enough. If R32 alchemy isn't a semi-decent 'fix' to the tec...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.05.23 22:00:00
|
157. I really Know why Eve don't get more Players.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Maximille Biagge wrote: Deal with it. We need a EVE themed monocle version of "deal with it" in this thread ASAP!!!
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.05.23 21:47:00
|
158. I really Know why Eve don't get more Players.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I see the optimal solution to PVP being too scary is to adjust PVE in a way that it is as close to being PVP as possible. I think the devs kind of like the idea and will do such things in the future as they have time and resources to spend on so...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.05.23 21:22:00
|
159. CCP technetium !!!!!!!!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm still confused why r32 alchemy hasn't been implemented. It seems the devs want this bottleneck to stay for some strange reason. If r32 alchemy isn't enough then add ring mining on top of that. This bottleneck has persisted for far too long and...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.05.23 08:54:00
|
160. A new interview - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Back during Dominion a bottleneck was created in terms of technetium and the players warned of this happening. CCP went ahead with this change and as a result major alliances used technetium moons as a source of passive income supplying the tech 2...
- by Elzon1 - at 2012.05.22 09:21:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |