| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 |
41. I want mechs - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Enkryption on 08/06/2008 02:49:14 This is gonna sound really bad on my part but... I once had a dream where I was in a crow with 5 fighters flying across a planets surface and came across a "Turret Platform Mech". I fought it w...
- by Enkryption - at 2008.06.08 02:40:00
|
42. [RMR] Vexor NPC Setup - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Enkryption on 05/06/2008 19:42:47 [Vexor, 1. Vexor Missions] Medium Armor Repairer II Armor Kinetic Hardener II Armor Kinetic Hardener II Armor Thermic Hardener II 10MN Afterburner II Cap Recharger II Medium Capacitor Battery II...
- by Enkryption - at 2008.06.05 19:41:00
|
43. Booting From Station/Remove Access to Services - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This has nothing to do with PoS's :) I am talking about Outposts. By your argument it would seem all one has to do is close his eyes and he shall be magically connected to everything that is for sale in the galaxy. If that is so then I guess ther...
- by Enkryption - at 2008.06.05 01:59:00
|
44. The "REAL" Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: AlexiK Rapiers/Huggins anyone? with 2-3 of them a nanogang will go away So everyone should be forced to train minmitar recons to be able to counter nanogangs? Yah I can see it happening...not really.
- by Enkryption - at 2008.06.05 00:52:00
|
45. Stacking modules in the UI - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Good idea!
- by Enkryption - at 2008.06.05 00:43:00
|
46. Booting From Station/Remove Access to Services - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Enkryption on 05/06/2008 00:34:35 Originally by: Marcus Gideon Ownership is a fluid concept. Fluid how? The station(s) are payed for by the alliance, built by the alliance, and defended by the alliance, how are they not...
- by Enkryption - at 2008.06.05 00:34:00
|
47. Booting From Station/Remove Access to Services - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Enkryption on 05/06/2008 00:15:56 Quote: As far as removing people from stations: I disagree 100% - this would really wreck havoc on allot of players without serving actual purpose. They are engaged in a form of "partisan" war...
- by Enkryption - at 2008.06.05 00:15:00
|
48. Booting From Station/Remove Access to Services - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I was thinking there should be a way for the owning corp of a station to forcibly remove people from a station. or Remove access to all services (including the market with the sole exception of contracts) if you do not meet the owners standing...
- by Enkryption - at 2008.06.04 20:04:00
|
49. The "REAL" Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Inertial Nanoes are not a problem. The problem is stupidity. The problem is it takes multiples of people to take down a single cruiser sized nano ship that is piloted by someone with the IQ of a chimp. But of course, y...
- by Enkryption - at 2008.05.23 13:20:00
|
50. The "REAL" Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sakura Nihil All it takes sometimes is an inty or two getting close and holding you down. As you say "oh ****", the oh-so-helpful Cerb and Drake pilots you're fighting against drop a swarm of missiles on your expensive toy....
- by Enkryption - at 2008.05.23 13:17:00
|
51. The "REAL" Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I love idiots like this who try to justify how their nanofit ships aren't overpowered because a gang of 5+ specifically setup ships can take them out. I mean, come on guys, get 5+ people together to take out one person in a cruiser , a...
- by Enkryption - at 2008.05.23 12:52:00
|
52. Questions For Carrier Pilots - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
A lot of carrier pilots seem to think this change will be the absolutely worst change ever in Eve. I would like to know why you think this change will be so terrible after answering a few questions. 1. What do you use your carrier for? Name all t...
- by Enkryption - at 2007.10.23 08:07:00
|
53. Every Player who feels the Carrier/ Mothership Nerf is wrong>>>>>>>>>> - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So much whining about this change. I read all these battle reports on CAOD about how completely terrible lag is when someone deploys drones as a fleet jumps in or a blob of carriers releasing drones and the game coming to a stand still in the tens...
- by Enkryption - at 2007.10.23 03:54:00
|
54. The latest updates - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Enkryption on 23/10/2007 00:44:49
- by Enkryption - at 2007.10.23 00:41:00
|
55. ALTERNATIVE TIMELINE: One Year Ago... CCP announce the follwing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Okkie2 Edited by: Okkie2 on 22/10/2007 07:55:47 Nerfing a ship to fix problems that don't exist (and doesn't even solve the real problem) is not the way to solve things That's the reason there is so much complaining. ...
- by Enkryption - at 2007.10.22 23:14:00
|
56. You're killing cap ships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cap Ships are killing the game.
- by Enkryption - at 2007.10.22 04:27:00
|
57. Good Moooooooooooorning, Tyrrax! - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Exortius Amarrus Originally by: Obidios People saying the bet was won because of downtime are ******s. Even if IAAAAC put towers on every moon and killed all of BOB's it would still be our station today. This. T...
- by Enkryption - at 2007.10.21 02:13:00
|
58. Good Moooooooooooorning, Tyrrax! - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Stoned Celt Originally by: Enkryption Originally by: Nahia Senne Once Tyrrax pays off his gambling debts, a new bet cant be made. Until debts are paid in full, i see no reason why you should gamble with peopl...
- by Enkryption - at 2007.10.20 08:58:00
|
59. Good Moooooooooooorning, Tyrrax! - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Nahia Senne Once Tyrrax pays off his gambling debts, a new bet cant be made. Until debts are paid in full, i see no reason why you should gamble with people who refuse to pay. I have no doubt TT would pay the bet, but Pi...
- by Enkryption - at 2007.10.20 08:44:00
|
60. Good Moooooooooooorning, Tyrrax! - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Vaarmoth Malinigvious Originally by: Enkryption Edited by: Enkryption on 20/10/2007 07:36:24 Originally by: Vaarmoth Malinigvious Originally by: Enkryption To be honest, if it was me, I'd go doubl...
- by Enkryption - at 2007.10.20 07:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |