| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
301. [DATAC] Discussion of Profit Sharing - in Market Discussions [original thread]
My feeling is the whole way the plan was structured was at fault. Here's how I'd have done it: Investors buying shares would have been buying into ALL stages of the project. So each investor would have been expected to make staged payments to you...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.21 08:23:00
|
302. [DATAC] Discussion of Profit Sharing - in Market Discussions [original thread]
I don't think you see the risks the same way as I do. The risk to both parties (you and investors) isn't directly that data-cores will drop, it's derived factors from that. One of the main ones being: If data-cores crash, no new investors (with a...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.21 08:14:00
|
303. [DATAC] Discussion of Profit Sharing - in Market Discussions [original thread]
In the "skilling up" period, the book value you assign to the shares isn't actually based on the actual (or even expected) performance of the shares - rather, you're "marking the shares up" in line with a target payout of 4%. I completely understa...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.21 08:01:00
|
304. [DATAC] Discussion of Profit Sharing - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Ricdic Ignore that 4% bi-weekly thing. That was only explaining that even in a worst case scenario, 100% being paid out as dividends would still equal the 4% bi weekly. Matalino wants to make sure the math is correct before ...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.20 19:44:00
|
305. [DATAC] Discussion of Profit Sharing - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Ricdic What do you guys think of this. Matalino wants to privatise/take personal ownership of the business in January 2009 (or end of 2008 basically). How do you feel about 100% of all profits being dividended up until this...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.20 19:21:00
|
306. [DATAC] Discussion of Profit Sharing - in Market Discussions [original thread]
I honestly can't see where the difficulty is in doing a simple split. To pay out a certain percentage of profits doesn't require that you divulge details of how you run the business - just that you divulge what the profits are. As I mentioned in t...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.20 18:03:00
|
307. Help With IPO Scammer Names Needed - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Fitz VonHeise Originally by: Digital Nightfall There are so many reasons why its unethical to put names down on a list where they cant engage in any kind of debate to argue their own case. As I have already said a...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.20 11:07:00
|
308. [CAP4U] Capital Productions Unified IPO - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: LaVista Vista My plan was indeed to do 9%. But several large factors outside my control have killed it. 1. The prices on capitals are dropping very rapidly atm, hard to sell them also atm, because people sell at stupid pric...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.20 10:14:00
|
309. [Discussion] Purpose of the Market Discussions forum - in Market Discussions [original thread]
I'd like to see moderation kept as light as possible. They, for me, when assessing a post isn't so much what the post itself says - as what the OP (or other person involved in the discussion) could say in reply to progress the thread. It's the sma...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.20 09:40:00
|
310. [CAP4U] Capital Productions Unified IPO - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Proton Power Originally by: FastLearner Originally by: LaVista Vista Originally by: Ezoran DuBlaidd Originally by: LaVista Vista Projected Return per Dividend Payment(%) This is depends on...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.20 09:30:00
|
311. [DATAC] Proposed Expansion - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Shadarle Edited by: Shadarle on 20/10/2007 07:20:58 It has always seemed to me that profits could get extremely high on this possibly... the ~4% bi-weekly divs is what kept me away from it. It's a bit too risky and long ...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.20 09:09:00
|
312. EVEonline ISK 100M $3.33 trust 100% guarantee by paypal - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Hexxx Ok...now THIS you can definintly lock/delete/mod!!!! Only buy orders and questions to the OP in this forum :)
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.19 12:26:00
|
313. [CAP4U] Capital Productions Unified IPO - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: LaVista Vista Originally by: Ezoran DuBlaidd Originally by: LaVista Vista Projected Return per Dividend Payment(%) This is depends on how many shares are sold. If little amount is sold, itĘs not got going...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.19 12:04:00
|
314. Fury Holdings - Results/Updates Thread - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Prodigal Just as a final rebuttal to the arguement... Here you are concluding that your buy/build, deliver and sell cycle has gone even better than anticipated (meaning sales were great) and you still have 22+ Billion in st...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.19 07:40:00
|
315. [service] Chribba's 3rd party service - in Sell Orders [original thread]
I used Chribba's services a week or two ago. Everything went smoothly and I'd definitely use him again if a third-party service were required by me in the future.
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.18 18:18:00
|
316. Fury Holdings - Results/Updates Thread - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: FastLearner on 18/10/2007 15:45:51 Report for week 13th-19th October 2007 Report (and dividends) is a day early this week - this is due to me planning to be moving a lot of stock around tomorrow, making stock-taking tricky to do th...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.18 15:44:00
|
317. Fury Holdings - Results/Updates Thread - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Results for Week 13th October 2007 - 19th October 2007. Net Asset Value at start of week : 23.193 Billion ISK ---------- Breakdown of assets at end of period: Fixed Assets Ship/Major BPOs : 11.786 Billion POS : 999 million Freighter : 900 mil...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.18 15:20:00
|
318. RDIR Shareholder Vote #1 - Revaluation - in Market Discussions [original thread]
I'll change my vote to yes, so this passes. The disadvantage of delaying implementatin far outweighs any debatable benefit of keeping capitalisation low.
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.18 07:44:00
|
319. RDIR Shareholder Vote #1 - Revaluation - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Benvie Originally by: FastLearner Originally by: Shar Tegral Originally by: FastLearner I'd vote no - as obviously any such dilution would reduce the profit on my own share-holding. I disagree but s...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.18 00:49:00
|
320. Shar Managed IPO - Revelations Direct - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: FastLearner on 18/10/2007 00:44:42 Originally by: Taikun Originally by: Shar Tegral Originally by: Minerva Vulcan As someone who's fairly new to these forums, the last thing I need is being wrongly associate...
- by FastLearner - at 2007.10.18 00:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |