| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Capital Ship Component Outsourcing - in Market Discussions [original thread]
To put mineral compression into perspective, it takes about 500 / 1000 425mms per carrier / dread respectively. Using this method it is possible to fit about 10 capitals in a single JF run. The cost to compress the minerals is typically less than ...
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2013.10.02 10:01:00
|
2. Crowdfunding - in Market Discussions [original thread]
I'd be an idiot to refuse one of MD's best offerings. ISK sent.
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2013.09.16 14:30:00
|
3. Vigilant Price Crash - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: I am clearly an idiot Fixed. Anything you can dock is insurable, to a greater or lesser extent.
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2013.07.19 11:38:00
|
4. Financial Fraud, Cartels, Monopoly, API's and you. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
7 pages of people trying to convince someone too stupid to realise his own stupidity that he is wrong. My only wish is that I could say threads like this are rare The only merit is that you somehow scrambled together the mental agility to use...
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2013.07.11 14:53:00
|
5. Battleships mineral changes on sisi - in Market Discussions [original thread]
I don't have hard data to back this up but it seems that minerals are currently being vastly over-consumed (more being added to the ship stockpile than leaving the game through ship destruction). Post patch Tier 1 BS will no longer be built, alon...
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2013.05.20 09:25:00
|
6. T2 bpo rent scams - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Captain-Jean LucPicard wrote: IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote: Not sure why you care so much, funny, I was JUST thinking the same about you :D Yeah, hence why I made a thread in a different forum about it, but thanks for the input who...
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2013.03.28 19:24:00
|
7. T2 bpo rent scams - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Arronicus wrote: Actually, the renter DID pay what was owed. He was fully up to date on rent. The ONLY reason the BPO owner cancelled the whole thing, and stole his items was because the pos, all the contents of which, belonged to the renter, a...
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2013.03.28 18:05:00
|
8. T2 bpo rent scams - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Otti Ottig wrote: actually, if you look at the BPO-¦s they arent very profitable (doesnt mean they arent worth a lot) so it would actually take quite a bit time and effort to get the 22b out of them. And the way i was reading the whole story i...
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2013.03.28 17:56:00
|
9. If idle ISK is bad, what would be a stable investment? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Plex aren't bad as their 'value' is relatively constant, 30 days of game time no matter when so they should adjust for inflation pretty well. Avoid NPC or LP items like BPOs and implants as they are tied to absolute ISK values.
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2013.03.28 15:47:00
|
10. T2 bpo rent scams - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Arronicus wrote: Are these common? As per: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2802507#post2802507 Trying to find out if many others have had their stuff stolen in these sorts of circumstances, or if there are legit ones...
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2013.03.28 15:21:00
|
11. Increase/Decrease Market Price [Reasons] - in Market Discussions [original thread]
1.4 to 1.2 is a pretty small change, in a low volume item like a chimera that is well within natural fluctuations. For example even thought long term suppy and demand are balanced. changes still occur because of chaotic effects in Eve, A) Throug...
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2013.03.21 16:51:00
|
12. 15b Loan @ 7% interest monthly - in Market Discussions [original thread]
The NPC corp is strong in this thread. :popcorn:
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2013.02.26 01:17:00
|
13. A new investment approach : 40%+ interest offered - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Well this thread really has been a roller-coaster of emotion, I would have liked a little more foreplay as it were, maybe some will they / won't they at the beginning to build the tension, normally this poor start would have been enough to cripple...
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2013.02.08 17:16:00
|
14. CSM notes on faucets & sinks - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Candy Oshea wrote: this is what happens when a mechanical engineer argues with ecomonics major's isn't it I really hope that isn't accredited.
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2013.01.20 09:09:00
|
15. Datacores - Surely its all up from here. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Herman Klaus wrote: I suspect it is you trying buy low before the inevitable spike. Comes on the forum asking for advice. Get advice from someone who knows more than him. Rejects advice. Enjoy your loss
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2012.11.05 22:20:00
|
16. FW item price spike? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Think it depends vastly on the items, items that had an ISK purchase price will hike hard (implants, datacores, cap boosters) other things will depend greatly on how each faction does. If one faction attains a stable Tier 5 balance then expect th...
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2012.10.24 09:55:00
|
17. Implications for the proposed Technetium changes. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
whaynethepain wrote: Na, it's gonna go the other way I imagine. If they had the level of control you imply they would be better set up to do this now. Your argument seems to be supply increasing will somehow increase prices?
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2012.07.26 06:57:00
|
18. Implications for the proposed Technetium changes. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Bumping with an update to the plan After evaluating the market reactions and the estimates from experienced players we now feel comfortable accelerating our planned implementation these reactions. We're going to have them sta...
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2012.07.25 13:10:00
|
19. Implications for the proposed Technetium changes. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Assuming this patch goes through as currently laid out what will the wider implications be? It seems obvious that new reactants for Platinum Technite should gain some value for those brave enough to speculate, but what about the indirect change, ...
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2012.07.19 14:43:00
|
20. Does FW Tier 4&5 ISK reductions destroy the LP ISK sink? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Actually more ISK is destroyed per LP Same ISK / LP ratio but more taxes on the transactions per LP.
- by IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 - at 2012.07.16 14:18:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |