Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. WTS - 95 million SP. Focused PVP - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Confirming isk received.
- by Inistis - at 2011.10.24 21:02:00
|
2. WTS - 95 million SP. Focused PVP - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Confirm
- by Inistis - at 2011.10.24 20:56:00
|
3. WTS - 95 million SP. Focused PVP - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Posting to officially accept your offer.
- by Inistis - at 2011.10.24 20:54:00
|
4. WTS - 95 million SP. Focused PVP - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Please contact me in game to discuss. Will be online next few hours - thanks
- by Inistis - at 2011.10.24 20:12:00
|
5. WTS - 95 million SP. Focused PVP - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Bump/
- by Inistis - at 2011.10.23 20:34:00
|
6. WTS - 95 million SP. Focused PVP - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Thanks for the offer Cr1ms0n - But I would really only entertain offers around the 35 mark.
- by Inistis - at 2011.10.22 20:15:00
|
7. WTS - 95 million SP. Focused PVP - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
WTS 95 million very focused skill points. Highlights include: Gallente Dreadnaught 5 and Capital Hybrid 5. Battleship 5 in every race, plus weapon systems to match. Marauders 5. 26 million SP in Gunnery alone ! Slave implants (no...
- by Inistis - at 2011.10.21 03:33:00
|
8. @ CCP: Delete inactive Characters - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Put the cool names up for Aurum Auction.....
- by Inistis - at 2011.08.29 02:29:00
|
9. High Sec Wardec - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Of course the other option is to remain in a starter corp. Or join a nullbear alliance and bear it up, in relative safety.
- by Inistis - at 2011.08.25 20:40:00
|
10. High Sec Wardec - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
The "Buy Out" option is already available. Contact the CEO of your "aggressor" corp and I'm sure they will be happy to accommodate you.
- by Inistis - at 2011.08.25 16:39:00
|
11. Release character names of unused characters - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
How about selling old char names for plex Or auction for charity !
- by Inistis - at 2011.05.24 06:33:00
|
12. Capitals in highsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It would seem then another concern worth talking about is that the introduction of Capitals to High sec may induce blob warfare. Im not sure I see how - Anybody that has had experience with 0.0 warfare and Highsec warfare can tell you that the tw...
- by Inistis - at 2011.02.02 17:58:00
|
13. Capitals in highsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Infinity Ziona Forgot to mention: Low sec / 0.0 people - don't want capitals in high sec because they're wanna be special. High sec people - don't want capitals in high sec because they're afraid. General consensus - don'...
- by Inistis - at 2011.02.01 07:14:00
|
14. Capitals in highsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I can see everybodies concern with neutral RR carriers. But I would say that the problem lies with the neutral RR mechanic not carriers. I also see the concern for cyno jumping being a too powerful travel tool - Simple dont allow cynos and let th...
- by Inistis - at 2011.02.01 01:31:00
|
15. Capitals in highsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Deja Thoris Concord says no (Which really means CCP says no) Highsec is meant to be "safer". One of the things this means is no caps in combat there. The only ones allowed are some that are grandfathered in from the days yo...
- by Inistis - at 2011.01.31 08:05:00
|
16. Capitals in highsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Windjammer Would make it kind of hard on the newbs, wouldn't it? -Windjammer Its all relative to how new you are - a Battleship is hard on a newb during his / her first month.
- by Inistis - at 2011.01.31 07:52:00
|
17. Capitals in highsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
For With 0.0 dwellers all trading in their now ôobsoleteö dreadnaughts and carriers for Motherships, highsec would seem like the next best place for these vessels to roam. Allowing Capitals in high sec would also add an interesting dynamic to em...
- by Inistis - at 2011.01.31 07:49:00
|
18. Capitals in highsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The title is kinda self-explanatory but I would like to hear peopleÆs views on allowing Dreadnaughts and Carriers operate in High security space. Let intelligent discussion commence. Please preface û ôFor ô or ôAgainst ô and then your thoughts.
- by Inistis - at 2011.01.31 07:41:00
|
19. " Since you have proven to be an enemy to our people " - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ok - I should have expected this thread to slide side ways quickly. Point of the matter is that it is a ******ed message that nobody except the recipient (possibly) needs to see.
- by Inistis - at 2011.01.27 23:36:00
|
20. " Since you have proven to be an enemy to our people " - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I understand the mechanic behind the notification - I just dont understand what purpose it achiives by anouncing it to all of local...
- by Inistis - at 2011.01.27 23:11:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |