| Pages: [1] |
1. Alliance rename resolution - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well it looks like the argument was not worked out properly at all from CCP's perspective. If sound it out was what they were doing why did they not tell us? Instead they present it as a decision and we go through the arguments for them. They chec...
- by Lubsmelongtime - at 2009.03.25 20:40:00
|
2. Alliance rename issue - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dungar Loghoth CCP has NEVER helped anyone get their sov back - in this case, they are helping BOBR by not taking it away from them, which also has never been done before, because CCP has never renamed an alliance simple b...
- by Lubsmelongtime - at 2009.03.25 17:30:00
|
3. Alliance rename issue - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kheldon Fel So, what, the legitimate reasons that dozens of previous denied alliances are void because the weren't an alliance spamming multiple regions? Well gee golly, I guess the little people really are ****ed. Tha...
- by Lubsmelongtime - at 2009.03.25 16:23:00
|
4. Alliance rename issue - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Lubsmelongtime on 25/03/2009 16:03:50 Originally by: Kuranta Since you still don't get it: When a Alliance is disbanded for whatever reason you can: a) Join existing alliance. You can eventually claim sov faster (or, in ca...
- by Lubsmelongtime - at 2009.03.25 16:03:00
|
5. Alliance rename issue - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dungar Loghoth You're not appealing to any kinds of logic here - again, tell me why Stian Empire's petition was refused and KenZoKu's was granted. You can't come up with a good reason, so you continue to cling to appeals of...
- by Lubsmelongtime - at 2009.03.25 16:00:00
|
6. Alliance rename issue - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Lubsmelongtime on 25/03/2009 15:53:02 Originally by: Kuranta Originally by: Lubsmelongtime If you read the statement above carefully you will see is that CCP does not claim it has happened before. What they are ...
- by Lubsmelongtime - at 2009.03.25 15:52:00
|
7. Alliance rename issue - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kuranta CoW had to reform, pay 1 bil and lost sov. - Then they got their original name back. BoB did not pay and did not lose sov. And then they got a different name of their liking. Thats where it's different. Thats why...
- by Lubsmelongtime - at 2009.03.25 15:38:00
|
8. Alliance rename issue - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Lubsmelongtime on 25/03/2009 15:30:43 Edited by: Lubsmelongtime on 25/03/2009 15:30:28 double post dumb moi
- by Lubsmelongtime - at 2009.03.25 15:30:00
|
9. Alliance rename issue - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Razoq ok give an example when it has happened before where an alliance has not had to pay a billion isk and reset all the sov in systems controlled over a name change? even over a stupid typo like Stian and black Out. They ...
- by Lubsmelongtime - at 2009.03.25 15:29:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |