| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 |
121. Factional Warfare: Capturing Systems - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Have any systems been made vulnerable yet? I was thinking about this last night after we had captured 4 or 5 complexes in one system... would they have increased the points needed for a system capture perhaps? Don't really want systems changing ha...
- by MrChook - at 2008.06.13 07:40:00
|
122. Factional Warfare? NAHH, NANO NOOB BLOB - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Podruski yeah, **** off. its unbalanced. Stop appeasing the ****** movement, delete it. I'm not trying to appease anyone. I just don't really see them as a problem. I do have a nano vaga set up but I've never used it in...
- by MrChook - at 2008.06.13 01:02:00
|
123. Factional Warfare? NAHH, NANO NOOB BLOB - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: MrChook on 13/06/2008 00:29:34 Originally by: Del Narveux Why should the recon ship for one race be the only effective anti-nano? Particularly in FW, which one assumes most folks will be flying their own race's stuff. Hm...
- by MrChook - at 2008.06.13 00:28:00
|
124. Pros and Cons of Factional War??? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Admiral Tolwyn Ok, I thought there is a difference between Militia and for example the amarr ships at the normal gates. But it's not concord who's attacking right? And concord is protecting you from other players in your re...
- by MrChook - at 2008.06.12 12:27:00
|
125. OPEN A NEW FORUM: FACTIONAL WARFARE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Butter Dog it does need to be done And the poster above you needs to be podded repeatedly for using "3d".
- by MrChook - at 2008.06.12 11:59:00
|
126. Who hates from FW come and share your opinions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This is hilarious. I'm really enjoying the whining from the pirates that were pontificating on the forums prior to FW. I seem to recall many statements along the lines of "we are going to own the militias so hard that FW will be a failure" . Per...
- by MrChook - at 2008.06.12 11:25:00
|
127. Empyrean Age issues thread - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Casqade People that are experiencing weird issues with overview, right click menus and other interface issues, please clear your cache and settings. These things are usually caused by corrupted cache which can happen if ...
- by MrChook - at 2008.06.12 11:15:00
|
128. [SPLU] Call us Terrorists, but the Amarr Empire will Fall - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Originally by: cyberdog One day I shall see you on the battle field slaves, and you duct tape ships will crumble under the amazing power of my lazers. Be warned, I use T2 Duct tape. It has a nice metallised finish that is excellent at r...
- by MrChook - at 2008.06.12 05:18:00
|
129. What are most people flying in fw? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I've seen a lot of people flying pods.
- by MrChook - at 2008.06.12 01:46:00
|
130. Cheetah - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dear me, I thought it was just the ***lente that were whining about the changes to the covert ops. I love the Probe hull, never did like the Vigil. Stop the snivelling and get on with your life.
- by MrChook - at 2008.06.12 01:45:00
|
131. 24th Imperial Crusade - new joiners - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tressin Khiyne Originally by: dastommy79 If your gonna troll somebody, do it in caod. I am usually much more responsible with my posts... I am so ashamed. But I do believe that solo pilots in militias should be ...
- by MrChook - at 2008.06.12 01:14:00
|
132. CCP you fail at life and everything. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Vanessa Vasquez besides, i begin to wonder why this has been changed anyways? Because it was wrong from the beginning and now it's fixed (driven by the addition of the missing Amarr frigate which really is so sexy I'm tem...
- by MrChook - at 2008.06.11 01:59:00
|
133. CCP you fail at life and everything. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
HA HA !!! Sucked in Oregon... maybe now you can stop carebearing up those exploration sites and go do some PVP I like my new Cheetah though, always thought it would be better with the Probe hull. Cheers !
- by MrChook - at 2008.06.11 01:47:00
|
134. Impressions Trying Empyrean Age on SiSi - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: bwheeler I think you guys are forgeting one major part. FW will also be a major boom to miners and indusrialists, not just pirates... more pvp = more demand for ships = more demand for minerals = more profits for the people ...
- by MrChook - at 2008.05.27 11:58:00
|
135. Impressions Trying Empyrean Age on SiSi - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Hasak Rain Why is everyone assuming that only noobs are going to be playing FW? In fact, I am betting that most people who will play FW will either be Alliance alts or players in Empire who both carebear and pvp. This del...
- by MrChook - at 2008.05.27 11:38:00
|
136. CCP fuels the fires of war - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Oh, sweeeet. I was just saying the other day how much I dislike the Vigil hull and that the Cheetah should be a Probe hull! CCP must be listening to NPC corp chats
- by MrChook - at 2008.05.21 04:14:00
|
137. Trinity 1.1 Patch Deployment, Tuesday, 11 March from 0200-1600 GMT - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Decaying Youth what are CCP running? a chook raffle? NOOOOOoooooooooooo......... leave me alone, nobody raffles ME off and lives to crow about it!!!
- by MrChook - at 2008.03.10 06:49:00
|
138. CCP your forum technology fails - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: L70Rogue Originally by: Taua Roqa I used the search function yesterday. totally useless it works as intended noob Well, then whoever wrote the spec for that feature should be taken out the back and shot. Th...
- by MrChook - at 2008.02.20 11:09:00
|
139. CCP your forum technology fails - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Charles Provenzano "Will anotherforumsomething allow CCP the same level of integration or planned integeration that they currently have without spending endless manhours by adapting a generic message board to their needs ?"...
- by MrChook - at 2008.02.20 11:08:00
|
140. CCP your forum technology fails - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Raekone Originally by: Oregon sinful Your Face fails for complaining instead of offering other viable options Didn't read the actual content of my post at the top did you He said viable . PhpBB is a bug and ...
- by MrChook - at 2008.02.20 11:04:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |