| Pages: [1] |
1. Sovereignty and starbases, the future! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
After reading much of the posts on this subject I thought I would put my own views forward. First off a couple of statements to bare in mind. 1) The intent of the system is to spread conflict out 2) POS are not a good basis for a system as they i...
- by Muratis - at 2008.09.02 13:49:00
|
2. Human nature, Sovereignty & CCP - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
First an acknowledgement. Some of the ideas here are not original, unfortunately I could not find the thread in which I read them, so my apologies to the originator. To state the blindingly obvious; Many people do not find current blob base sover...
- by Muratis - at 2007.08.03 09:55:00
|
3. Human nature, Sovereignty & CCP - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
System and Constellation sovereignty As now maintaining sovereignty would keep outposts invulnerable. There are many logic reasons that outpost should be freely attackable but from a game point of view EVE has been through an era of station ping p...
- by Muratis - at 2007.08.03 09:55:00
|
4. Revelations 2.1 Post Patch Feedback Thread - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
On logging in there are no channels. Private channels appear only if i undock (and i appear in others private channels at that point). Local appears on a jump between systems. Nothing seems to make corp or alliance chat appear.
- by Muratis - at 2007.07.24 13:57:00
|
5. Petition to NOT make tempfiles in MyDocuments only - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Likewise, i use a different copy of the client for each account as the settings i use for my combat character is very different to the settings for my Industrialist, right down to the screen colours (as that makes it esay to tell which account i j...
- by Muratis - at 2007.05.25 12:44:00
|
6. Something missing from blob solutions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Reading through all the threads and posts on the problems with lag and blobs in the wake of the last weeks conflicts i could not help noticing that there was something missing from the varied solutions proposed. There are numerous suggestions abo...
- by Muratis - at 2007.02.17 12:39:00
|
7. Starmaps - Yet Another Insta Solution - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Of all the many 'solutions' to the insta BM problem i have read (and there have been one ot two recently) i think the OP's shows the most promise. It appears to give a solution to the lag and database problems without massively altering the balan...
- by Muratis - at 2006.09.04 16:56:00
|
8. Instas - buying time to build a solution - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I am sure you are sick of reading posts on instas but i am afraid here is another one. Worse this does not offer a solution, just a temporary fix that should not cause too much outcry (accept by those with extreme views who are never likely to be ...
- by Muratis - at 2006.09.01 16:10:00
|
9. Tuxford and the Amazing Drone Calculations Dev Blog - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Given that the Drone Interfacing skill bonus is no longer a repeat of the Drones Skill bonus is there any reason no to change the requirement for the Drone interfacing skill to Drones IV. This is a thought mainly for those starting the game (to w...
- by Muratis - at 2005.11.03 09:19:00
|
10. Discussion Piece - Fleet Combat 'improvements' - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Discussion Piece - Fleet Combat 'improvements' It's lunchtime and so for something to do i thought i would post a couple of ideas on how to reduce the tendency for large battles to be a case of poping single targets in the opposing fleet one by o...
- by Muratis - at 2005.09.08 12:00:00
|
11. Local channel and average players in space in 0.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Here are a few thoughts from someone who visits 0.0 regularly. It works out at a bit of a compromise but here goes anyway. What i would like to see is the following (why will come later) 1) Number of people in system should remain as it is now. 2...
- by Muratis - at 2005.08.18 15:43:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |