Pages: [1] |
1. Sticky:Singularity: Requests for account reactivation - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Activate Nerodon please! Thanks a lot!
- by Nerodon - at 2013.05.15 02:18:00
|
2. Caracter creation is laggy as hell - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Hmmm, It's possible that the older hardware may be simply too slow for the new engine, although I don't initialy know how resource hungry the new Carbon engine really is. I know that logically, it should need much more graphic power than eve in sp...
- by Nerodon - at 2010.12.24 21:25:00
|
3. Caracter creation is laggy as hell - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Runs fantastic on my machine. What are your system specs? Have you tried reducing the graphic quality level in the options, there are new ones exclusively for the character portion of the game, try tweaking those! I think the cloth/hair simulation...
- by Nerodon - at 2010.12.24 19:26:00
|
4. The Turnaround - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Riska Turoka Instead of spending who knows how much time and money developing a bot to simulate players, CCP could have developed tools to manage actual player testers (rewards and punishments). Hell, why not create another...
- by Nerodon - at 2010.08.09 16:14:00
|
5. The Turnaround - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Also, everyone has to keep in mind that logging on to SiSi is a privilege given to players in order to speed up the ongoing debug process. No way has it even meant to be a fun zone to try out new stuff they otherwise can't afford in TQ, unless in ...
- by Nerodon - at 2010.08.03 18:24:00
|
6. Singularity Mass Testing why? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP probably does not want to influence or disturb the world of Eve Online for the sake of testing, they shouldn't have to. The reason SiSi exists is to match the technology used in TQ and most likely to isolate tests in a controlled environment ...
- by Nerodon - at 2010.08.03 18:04:00
|
7. Make the CC useful - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
You double-click all the time when navigating folders on your computer. Admit the fact that you are simply lazy and you would love effortless gameplay. This isn't simcity that continues to grow in your predefined zones when you put the game on Ul...
- by Nerodon - at 2010.06.15 17:07:00
|
8. Anyone else think this version of Planetary interaction is dumb? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Orephia Most of these so-far end tier listed products have names suggesting Implants production, like Neural Interface & Wetware Mainframe. So not Rifters, but perhaps something more profitable. Time will tell. So much i...
- by Nerodon - at 2010.04.18 20:40:00
|
9. Anyone else think this version of Planetary interaction is dumb? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
This thread is heading Waaaay of course to OP's post. Anyways, I do think that what we see in the current iteration of PI on the test server to be just that a test. CCP wants to test the mechanics and filter out bugs with the planet mineral syste...
- by Nerodon - at 2010.04.18 18:38:00
|
10. PI and group based manufacturing - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Nerodon on 18/04/2010 00:08:05 PI on the test server as of now apears to be adapted to be managed by individual players only. Will there be any corp/alliance wide control of planets? Or the ability to "Give control" of the colony to...
- by Nerodon - at 2010.04.18 00:04:00
|
11. Illegal Podding.. Ban Possibly? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I plead guilty. If everyone posted their pod loss... there would be about 15. I thought podding in this fleet battle was okay. I was wrong. I have no excuse for what I done. Do what you must. [Order of New Eden] We carry our own destiny; no one ...
- by Nerodon - at 2010.04.17 23:27:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |