Pages: [1] 2 |
1. How many original '03 Toons are still out there? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Present and accounted for. Since beta even, although I remade this char after launch as I was suspicious of bugs.
- by Ravoc - at 2009.05.01 01:42:00
|
2. CCP = epic fail, sort the f.cking lag - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Pan Crastus just yet another 0.0 fleet fight that isn't happening ... Don't join fleet fights?
- by Ravoc - at 2008.04.27 15:48:00
|
3. New Dev Blog, Nozh's Jump Freighter! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
For each jump freighter pilot, you can easily find 10+ cargo dread pilots...
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.18 21:08:00
|
4. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer If you count tracking a maelstr and an abaddon do the same damage to eachother when they are up close. Mael has cap less weapons. Its a fair trade. Fair enough. Now add the tracking disruptors (range) to b...
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.12 23:52:00
|
5. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer ACs stay at range when facing blasters. Blasters cant reach em, but ACs still do dps outside blaster range. True, I pointed that out myself. But the AC damage will be crappy and not enough to beat the blast...
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.12 22:11:00
|
6. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer You forgetting that total range is opti+2xfall off? ROFL, do you even fly anything else than laserboats? Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Thats why AC dps is balanced IN FALL-OFF. If ACs would have l...
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.12 18:44:00
|
7. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Wu Jiun Td's were nerfed with script introduction in the same way as damps. So get your facts straight before you come here crying. Edit: Up to now pulses were the only close range weapons that suffered from range reduction...
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.11 20:26:00
|
8. Any Minmatar Love? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Lyria, if you claim to know the Tempest so well, try fighting all other bs in 1 vs 1 fights. Then tell me against which you actually won.
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.10 21:13:00
|
9. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Fine, stay blind and expect a bunch more whine threads later on. Anyway, I guess the dominix and amarr recons are going to be the new FOTM ...again! DTja vu anyone?
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.10 18:53:00
|
10. Any Minmatar Love? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong The tempest has 5 med slots. In the same passive plated setup that everyone else has it needs 3 since it isnt using cap to fire its guns. This means either 2 webs, or two tracking disruptors. That will be a prett...
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.10 14:24:00
|
11. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
ECM got nerfed in general strength for the sake of balance. Sensor Dampening got nerfed in general strength for the sake of balance. Now it's time to nerf Tracking Disruption in general strength too.
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.10 14:09:00
|
12. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
No you didn't. ACs against blasters? yes ACs/blasters against pulses? hardly
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.10 14:00:00
|
13. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sorry, but I can't take your word on that. Your holy love for the new I-win button doesn't make you that credible.
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.10 12:36:00
|
14. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The Sentinel doesn't matter. The point is that under the same conditions, Amarr becomes overpowered and Gallente underpowered.
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.10 02:43:00
|
15. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong It is. But what Amarr or Gallente battleship can run 2 tracking disruptors with an mwd, web, and scram while not needing cap to fire its guns or run its tank? A: The tempest The Tempest is prolly the ****tiest...
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.10 02:13:00
|
16. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I assumed a bs vs bs scenario, not bs vs recon. A Rook can easily beat all 3 either. Besides, a Pilgrim is prolly better of disrupting the tracking instead of the range.
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.10 01:50:00
|
17. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Ravoc on 09/02/2008 23:37:20 Let me give a practical example: Maelstrom vs Hyperion vs Abaddon, 2 disruptors (-40% optimal & falloff each), (edit) full skills Maelstrom Optimal: 3000m / old disruptor: 1080m / new disruptor: 1080m F...
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.09 23:36:00
|
18. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Stats of the large heavy short range turrets: 800mm Repeating Artillery II optimal: 4800m / 3000m with skills & EMP L (20em, 16ex, 8ki - 44 total) falloff: 16000m / 20000m with skills tracking: 0.0432 dam mod: 3.234 Neutron Blaster Cannon I...
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.09 20:41:00
|
19. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Nope, and do you know why? ACs arent balanced around their dps at their optimal. To put that short: we dont want AC boats sticking dmg mods in mids and lows that dont stack nerf with gyros. Have you ev...
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.09 17:58:00
|
20. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Takeshi Yamato Disagree with that. The optimal script is supposed to reduce the range of turrets, and it does just that when it lowers optimal and falloff. Nothing more nothing less. The fact that it affects two stats of is ...
- by Ravoc - at 2008.02.09 15:02:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |