| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
61. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Rosewalker wrote: WoW - My understanding is that Blizzard screwed over ISBoxer users big time by taking the /follow command out of battlegrounds. They didn't give any notice. They just did it. At least CCP gave ISBoxer user...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.30 20:20:09
|
62. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bli ShadowandLight wrote: If this is so concrete in CCP's mind, why dont they sit down and answer questions? Why do people send in petitions and get different answers from what you above interpreted CCP's acutal stance to be? Is it impossibl...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.30 19:27:52
|
63. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sealin Windfire wrote: I would like to Clarify that in no way do I use any form of anything to control the 5 accounts I have, but I would like to point out the legality aspect of this. The only way CCP could be finding out what somebody is usin...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.29 16:46:14
|
64. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ShadowandLight wrote: heres a quick video, more proof of concept, showing how isboxer mouseovers can be used to very quickly activate dozens of modules https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhAk7EMDjvE&feature=youtu.be You really are on a c...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.28 01:52:53
|
65. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I only took a look here because Lucas left a comment on my blog. It's Christmas and you guys are still waging your little war? Well, I hope you take (or took, depending on where you live) an hour or two to get away from the serious business of ...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.25 15:09:37
|
66. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nolak Ataru wrote: Rosewalker wrote: As much as I'd like to be wrong, I agree that a bunch of people will probably get banned for not realizing that CCP was taking away the exceptions that currently litter the forums. If I didn't, I wouldn't...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.23 23:50:12
|
67. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Rosewalker wrote: Perhaps Lucas sees something that I don't in trying to decypher the tea leaves. But as far as I can tell, you got your orange neon sign in the dev blog. Here's the key statement: CCP Grimmi wrote: Any ...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.23 23:02:51
|
68. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Rosewalker wrote: Your using Teamspeak as the example is interesting. If you look in the Third Party Policies , Teamspeak is specifically mentioned as an app that technically violates the EULA, but CCP doesn't really care ...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.23 22:33:58
|
69. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nolak Ataru wrote: Rosewalker wrote: But the objective should be to avoid getting banned in the first place. That means trying to figure out where the line that will get you banned is Victim blaming aside, that's what we're TRYING to do h...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.23 22:15:36
|
70. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nolak Ataru wrote: As we've (and you too) have mentioned before, Twitter is not an official platform and any announcement on Twitter is "meh" until they post it on a dev blog or the forum. Steve used specifically vague language that could have ...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.23 21:09:23
|
71. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Rosewalker wrote: One more question I got, and it comes from reading the security dev blog on Friday. The way you describe how the round robin works is what I took from the video. That is, think of the WoW spell as F1 and i...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.23 19:46:38
|
72. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Rosewalker wrote: Now, my understanding of the EULA is that all commands must be entered using the EVE client. So what you are telling me is that round robin bypasses the EVE client and injects the commands directly into th...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.23 17:11:46
|
73. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Drago Shouna wrote: Nolak Ataru wrote: Eli Apol wrote: Round robin sends one command to the focus window and one command to your window management software (to change to the next focus window) per click. Macro. (Al...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.23 16:08:11
|
74. Mouse Macro Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
KIller Wabbit wrote: Rosewalker wrote: From a tweet from CCP Random, any such posts from before 1 January 2015 will be "outdated". If you hadn't posted this I would not have known that since I don't do Twitter. CCP making such notices...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.22 15:26:12
|
75. Clarification on seeking clarification regarding EULA related issues... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jean Luc Lemmont wrote: Mara Rinn wrote: That sounds about right. If the GM told you to take it to the forums, I would suggest escalating that support ticket. Ask for a senior GM to give it some attention. Failing that, I would go full ther...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.22 04:06:39
|
76. Mouse Macro Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Waltaratzor wrote: Rosewalker wrote: Waltaratzor wrote: Sibyyl wrote: Maybe you don't want an answer. Sounds like you just want someone to tell you that it's ok. No I want an answer from an authoritative source. If the answer is ...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.21 22:38:32
|
77. Mouse Macro Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Waltaratzor wrote: Sibyyl wrote: Maybe you don't want an answer. Sounds like you just want someone to tell you that it's ok. No I want an answer from an authoritative source. If the answer is no then I will be surprised but I will move...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.21 21:08:44
|
78. Mouse Macro Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nolak Ataru wrote: Rosewalker wrote: ~Shilling and a**kissing for CCP~ I guess it depends on your point of view. I look at this as CCP finally agreeing with me on what the EULA actually says. I'm not getting everything I wanted two year...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.21 19:56:59
|
79. Mouse Macro Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nolak Ataru wrote: Rosewalker wrote: Yes, I'm referring to the accelerated gameplay clause. What I'm referring to is the use of macros. If the macro makes you more efficient than someone not using the macro, then CCP can use the banhammer. I...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.21 08:43:04
|
80. Mouse Macro Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nolak Ataru wrote: Rosewalker wrote: CCP isn't targeting ISBoxers, no matter how much propaganda is being spread around on that score. They would expend less effort if they just chose to detect Inner Space and automatically ban everyone they...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.12.21 03:54:13
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |