| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
121. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Robert Caldera wrote: Man, its funny how hordes of isbotters claiming here how they cant be caught. Holy ****, go try it out after January, 1st if you're so smart and tell us how it went for you. I don't understand that mentality myself. I ...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.11.27 01:22:30
|
122. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Not Primary Disengage wrote: this is a mistake. i would not have resubscribed if I knew this would be restricted. No other MMO restricts this and no other MMO is as well suited towards it as EVE. Perhaps fixing your game is the solution and ...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.11.25 18:09:34
|
123. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I hope that on or shortly before 1 January that the Policies page is updated with this information. In the past, CCP has had a bad habit of just posting this type of information on the forums. This information really needs to either have its own...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.11.25 16:47:23
|
124. Sticky:[Phoebe] Higgs Anchor Rigs - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Yana Hendar wrote: So, an anti bumping rig... surely this should be a lowslot module, like the other hull stuff (or maybe just a cap-sized rig). If miners don't want to be bumped, or they want to avoid PVP outside of hisec, make them lose an ML...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.10.29 14:26:07
|
125. The ISBoxer Saga - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Okay, for everyone who is complaining about ISBoxer breaking the EULA, please remember that CCP has given ISBoxer dispensation from parts of the EULA. This time, I am going to quote the entire section on Client Modification from the Third Party P...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.10.13 03:43:00
|
126. The ISBoxer Saga - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mag's wrote: Rosewalker wrote: CCP has stated in the Third Party Policies that even though ISBoxer violates the Sections 6A2, 6A3, and 9C of the EULA ("the multiboxing application" refers to ISBoxer) that it is not something that CCP will ...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.10.12 07:18:00
|
127. The ISBoxer Saga - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mallak Azaria wrote: I know a bunch of dudes that multibox in GW2 & have been doing so for ages. No bans yet. lol people played Aion. Sorry, but ISBoxer is not allowed in GW2. If you go to the ISBoxer website, you will find it is not l...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.10.12 07:04:00
|
128. Maybe Eve isn't dying after all.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote: To bite a WoW related quote from Greg Street when people were QQing about difficulty, and certain things being underpowered: "Have you ever played an electronic game on god mode? (UUDDLRLRBABASTART.) It's cute for ...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.08.08 21:49:00
|
129. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Is this STILL going on? Adrie Atticus wrote: Now you're going into the debate if we should use computers at all. What is allowed is clearly outlined in the EULA/TOS and ISBoxer is not currently breaking it. If it does start breaking rules, ...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.07.05 04:10:00
|
130. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
ashley Eoner wrote: You're making up rules. I could do the same thing as isboxer with some simple electrical work. Since I can do it purely with hardware you'd have absolutely no way of detecting it. Hell I could make isboxer impossible to d...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.07.01 13:33:00
|
131. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Naj Panora wrote: I love people who take thing too literally. The point is that the program can be used to circumvent game mechanics that CCP has implemented. The example was greatly exaggerated to demonstrate how it is an unfair advantage not...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.06.30 03:01:00
|
132. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Ashley, that was an interesting response. Let's see if I can address your points. ashley Eoner wrote: Have you ever actually tried to fly stealth bombers with isboxer? It's incredibly difficult and infuriating. You need save spots and such to...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.06.29 22:13:00
|
133. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Still going? Since the only people who are going to read this are the couple of people posting, forum mods, and the CSM, I'll drop in a pro-ban argument. One argument for banning ISBoxer is that people in PvP don't like losing to software. The nu...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.06.28 23:37:00
|
134. Proposal: Multibox use should only be allowed outside of NPC corps. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
De'Veldrin wrote: Multiboxerrs are ebil thread # 2,907,876,802,987,421. This must be the whine of the week - all I see are these threads. Probably because Wildstar basically banned ISBoxer, just like Guild Wars 2 did. Then again, WoW allows...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.06.25 02:17:00
|
135. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
This argument again? I'm not even going to restate my opinion on this. Instead, I'll quote from CCP's policy on client modification since no one ever bothers to quote or link to the appropriate policies and rules. After quoting Section 6A2, Sec...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.06.25 00:55:00
|
136. Don't try this at home! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ISD Ezwal wrote: Dirk MacGirk wrote: The whole thread is against the forum rules why? I don't thing Grimmi wrote anything that related to the rules you listed The Rules: 21. Posting regarding RMT (Real Money Trading) is prohibited. ...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.05.19 23:59:00
|
137. Sticky:[Kronos] Blockade Runner Rebalance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sheeana Harb wrote: Great changes, I'm glad to see increased cargo, especially for Prowler, as he will be able to transport cruisers. Yay! One suggestion that isn't really related to the balance, but could you please consider using: "Immune t...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.05.17 21:24:00
|
138. Sticky:[Kronos] Blockade Runner Rebalance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Priestess Lin wrote: Cargohold too puny. Allow them to be able to fit enough to launch and upgrade a customs office ~8000m3, if you won't let the deep space transports do it. Fozzie said all 4 ships will have 10,000+ m3 of cargohold with T1 ...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.05.17 21:11:00
|
139. Sticky:[Kronos] Blockade Runner Rebalance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Harvey James wrote: i still don't get why every cloaky ship needs too have cyno's???? The second high allows all four ships to mount probe launchers for use in wormholes. Currently only the Prowler is designed for use in w-space.
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.05.17 20:55:00
|
140. Sticky:[Kronos] Blockade Runner Rebalance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sigras wrote: Can you tell us what the thought process is behind the mass and agility nerf on the prowler? As it stands there doesnt seem to be much of a reason to use one over a viator. More mass, slightly slower align time, smaller cargo sa...
- by Rosewalker - at 2014.05.17 20:07:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |