| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
1. Petition for system name change for Vile Rat - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP could let the players vote on it. Or make a special status for peoples toons that are confirmed Deceased IRL that everyone can access. This is something dooable without having to worry about values of people etc. Human life has so much v...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.09.13 19:39:00
|
2. Goons 4x4ing through the Sandbox - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Richard Desturned wrote: RougeOperator wrote: So 900t to be able to name a system and its planets. this was nowhere close to 900tn, it was "only" around 5tn It theoretically was an infinite money loop. the real value is not impor...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.06.23 04:26:00
|
3. Goons 4x4ing through the Sandbox - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Richard Desturned wrote: RougeOperator wrote: maybe trillions is the going price for the right to name a system or two. Goonamake Id say that would be the only fair way for CCP to handle this problem of their own making with FW mechan...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.06.23 04:06:00
|
4. Goons 4x4ing through the Sandbox - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xython wrote: RougeOperator wrote: I said something like this was possible when they listed the changes that were coming. I was told no one would want to do the work to pull it off. Seems I new better. This is all CCPs fault, this was ...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.06.23 03:55:00
|
5. Goons 4x4ing through the Sandbox - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I said something like this was possible when they listed the changes that were coming. I was told no one would want to do the work to pull it off. Seems I new better. This is all CCPs fault, this was a super obvious thing. It was one of the ...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.06.23 03:44:00
|
6. CCP how meny dirty isk are inside eve market place ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cloned S0ul wrote: http://i.imgur.com/dtMk4.png some of print screns shared by playes inside game... Should you rolback data base or not ? You know i told people something like this was possible. And I was not listened too then. They sa...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.06.23 02:10:00
|
7. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Dirk Smacker wrote: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: 2.) The doomsday predictions will come true, and the war will stagnate, fights will decrease, and I will have demonstrated to CCP that they should have listened to me and pared back the multiplie...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.14 22:01:00
|
8. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lock out wrote: Mutnin wrote: 1st off I will say you are a lucky **** to get that Navy Geddon out the other day in structure and the friendly carriers were totally unexpected from us. We jumped into behind you guys started shooting stuff a...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.14 11:02:00
|
9. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Mutnin wrote: [quote=Lock out] I'm not interested in sov warfare so I'd likely just go pie again or just start roaming in null sec for random fights.. The station locks out are kinda a deal breaker for me , but I'll at least give it a try for...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.14 09:36:00
|
10. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Veshta Yoshida wrote: The current system was to supposedly to be a template for a sovereignty revamp, FW was once upon a time a null guinea pig .. but CCP chickened out. Remember all the talk prior to Dominion about CCP wanting null sov to b...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.14 04:18:00
|
11. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Vordak Kallager wrote: RougeOperator wrote: SigmaPi wrote: Or the revival, perhaps? Sigma, explain how this leads to a revival? I want some detailed reasoning as to how. Cause All i see is tracks being laid for it to be null sec lig...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.14 02:32:00
|
12. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
SigmaPi wrote: Or the revival, perhaps? Sigma, explain how this leads to a revival? I want some detailed reasoning as to how. Cause All i see is tracks being laid for it to be null sec light. Needing logistic chains and super blobs is whe...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.13 23:14:00
|
13. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Veshta Yoshida wrote: What we are getting is FW as seen through the eyes of null .. since changes are 99% identical to the Fanfest presentation it must have been planned based on feedback from the pure null CSM .. in that light it is understand...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.13 07:12:00
|
14. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Silence iKillYouu wrote: Wait and see. How about NO. Im sick of that "wait and see line." I have seen so many games and MMOs die because the fanbase took this stance. After so many horrible games this year and decisions by game compani...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.13 06:09:00
|
15. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
What we have to look forward too now is worse stagnation in FW then we had before.
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.13 01:11:00
|
16. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
When the fun created by the NEW SHINY stuff in the expansions ends after a month we will be stuck with how bad this is it will be too late. Obvious problems being if one faction dominates a zone. FW is not like 0.0 its full of casual or semi ...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.12 00:19:00
|
17. Logoffski exploit, video proof. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gogela wrote: FeralShadow wrote: Let me tell you a story, a story about pirates camping an entry system into our area of space. One day these pirates, while doing their usual shenanigans, notice a freighter jumped into their system. We were ...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.10 02:06:00
|
18. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
SigmaPi wrote: RougeOperator wrote: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: The long-awaited Dev Blog is up!! http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=28659 ... Maybe its just me but I tend to think the goal should be to make ...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.09 23:13:00
|
19. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: The long-awaited Dev Blog is up!! http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=28659 Well its clear that CCP wants to basically kill FW. The goal being FW light. I could put up with most of the...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.09 22:50:00
|
20. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
X Gallentius wrote: RougeOperator wrote: This whole thing is not very well thought out. It was very well thought out on the forums months ago. You have amazing low standards for what is well thought out then. This comes off as RP f...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.09 02:13:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |