| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2121. Resource Redistribution - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: Emu Meo wrote: Here is another anology - Tech moons in their current form is akin to having all wormhole and exploration signaures static and fixed in space never respawning. Ie once you've scanned them down, you never need t...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 23:43:00
|
2122. Advanced Battlecruisers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Read the Whole Dang DevBlog about the skill changes before whinging about them. wrote: Command Ships Racial Cruiser 5 requirement swapped for racial Battlecruiser 5 Generic and old Battlecruiser skill removed from the Command Ship skill ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 20:50:00
|
2123. Resource Redistribution - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Emu Meo wrote: The thread is missing the real point here in my opinion. Yes it is possible to compete with moon goo income, the issue is, is moon mining in its current form conducive to interesting a fun gameplay? In my opinion, and also I be...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 20:34:00
|
2124. Resource Redistribution - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog wrote: That's definitely one way to look at it - nerf a portion of the game that people actually interact with on a regular basis to bring it down to what you consider average moon goo profit levels. Or, we could go the...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 20:29:00
|
2125. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Murk Paradox wrote: Concord, in a bassackwards way, is protecting the ganker. If CONCORD did not exist, the ganker would not have any costs to minimize (well, ammo, but ). "Destroying a Ship is he...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 20:26:00
|
2126. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Once again, I made no claim as to what level of protection CONCORD provides. Just that protection is what they provide. Proof: People are using catalysts to gank Hulks instead of Proteus's. Ergo, CONCORD...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 19:30:00
|
2127. Resource Redistribution - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nobody's saying that it wasn't broken, so what's your point? Now there's Alchemy. Murk Paradox wrote: Rephrased. And no, you haven't demonstrated. You've used instances that don't compare to say they don't compare, but compete, which they do...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 18:25:00
|
2128. sanctum question - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Crying FreeWoman wrote: Are u sure of that ? May be some npc don't aggro ! What type of npc are you fighting ? Yes. They die too fast to approach and apply significant damage to your drones, and if they are doing enough damage to be worrisom...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 18:07:00
|
2129. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
March rabbit wrote: I don't get it. You mean policeman will stay and wait until you attacked/dead and then take weapon of "bad guy" and let him out independent of attack result? And your "protection of MrPresident" doesn't include analyzing o...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 18:04:00
|
2130. Resource Redistribution - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: You know, if moongoo is such a worthless commodity and doesn't really drive any conflict, let's just make it worthless. All the people in charge of handling it are saying it's worthless, everyone who doesn't involve it aren...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 17:31:00
|
2131. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
March rabbit wrote: And not only you "bad guys" adapt - everyone does it. Every time. Really? So why, then, are there scads of miners who never fit a tank to their ship? Why did they never adapt to the large scale ganking going on around t...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 09:14:00
|
2132. Resource Redistribution - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ace Uoweme wrote: Read Sure. When you start demonstrating that you read and understand posts before responding to them.
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 04:40:00
|
2133. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ace Uoweme wrote: It's at least more interesting than exchanging word definitions... That was tangential to the point of my post. (But you hang on to that thin thread of a reason to dodge the point.) Either way, the conditions of when and w...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 04:38:00
|
2134. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ace Uoweme wrote: RubyPorto wrote: I know what service CONCORD provides (it's Protection) You also are claiming CONCORD can't be tanked. Ask your Goon gatecampers how uninformed that remark is! You can definitely tank their guns, espe...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 04:36:00
|
2135. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ace Uoweme wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Are Police in your conception of reality both Omniscient and Omnipresent? They would be nice to have in EvE. Having them jail or even kill Goons and likewise pirates would be a blessing...and you know ma...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 03:31:00
|
2136. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ace Uoweme wrote: It's comprehensive enough, because the conditions are when or where you can even use your weapons. 1. Comprehensible. Not comprehensive. Two entirely different words. 2. That has absolutely nothing to do with whether or ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 03:16:00
|
2137. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ace Uoweme wrote: I guess he already knew about them being an infantryman in Korea and Vietnam. Like if you don't respond fast enough your buddies and you are going to die. Which is why he got the bronze star in Korea, by knocking out a machin...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 03:07:00
|
2138. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ace Uoweme wrote: Andski wrote: Ace Uoweme wrote: It's conditional PvP in a game suppose to be ABOUT 24/7 PvP. Seems you misunderstood "hyper-competitive PvP environment" as "a fragfest like Darkfall" What's competitive with Goons c...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 02:55:00
|
2139. Resource Redistribution - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ace Uoweme wrote: RubyPorto wrote: You seem to have no understanding of the actual events that that mediocre summary claims to represent. So you're saying to the world Evelopedia is lying? EvE has it on it's link bar, so would believe it'...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 02:04:00
|
2140. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ace Uoweme wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Quick, what does a Bulletproof Vest provide? Protection. Quick, I think 10001 players in High-Sec could actually use a bulletproof vest (with ceramic plates even), as CONCORD does jack for protection. By...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.03 01:57:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |