| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
361. Burner Mission Rewards are Horrible! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Aria Jimbojohnson wrote: Radamant Nemess wrote: Vortexo VonBrenner wrote: 3 - Burners have a chance to drop faction modules. Lemme bold this, for this is supposed to be the most lucrative aspect of burner missions...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.28 21:19:00
|
362. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
E-2C Hawkeye wrote: Scipio Artelius wrote: You can do something about it yourself. No need to ask CCP for help. You already have big guns too. Just like the other guy does. You just choose not to train for them, or not to use them. That's n...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.28 20:44:00
|
363. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kagura Nikon wrote: not at all. There is a small part of the movment that is reasoanble and do not want gank gone. Just think that the effects of cocnord intervention are too small, sepcially with the cheap gank ships like destroyers. Just that...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.28 17:46:00
|
364. "How Highsec miners threaten EVE, and how we can stop them.&quo... - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
La Rynx wrote: You got me. It is mostly not only. In fact freighters are "fair game". If you have evidence to show that CODE is targeting rookies, you should report them to CCP.
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.28 17:42:00
|
365. "How Highsec miners threaten EVE, and how we can stop them.&quo... - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
La Rynx wrote: Bronson Hughes wrote: La Rynx wrote: codies fight only rookie targets. All others are better protected, pros and botters alike. So jump freighter pilots are rookie targets? I am not talking of freigthers. code propaga...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.28 09:01:00
|
366. Quick Question for the Dev's - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sentamon wrote: Jitamule Momaki wrote: you know i've never in my entirely life seen such a Toxic, hostile, hateful comunity then Eve online i once thought League of Legends comunity was Toxic.... it dosn't hold a wick to Eve's even in the s...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.28 08:50:00
|
367. Quick Question for the Dev's - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jitamule Momaki wrote: you know what your right im not ok with high sec suicide ganking i think its a broken system that only leads to anger and hate. but that dosn't answer my question as to why is CCP ok with this? CCP Solomon wrote: th...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.28 08:47:00
|
368. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Celthric Kanerian wrote: Tears? I'm merely stating the fact that you are all a bunch of noobish and honorless gankers, regardless of what alliance you belong to. You know, I communicate almost exclusively in gifs ranging from the moderately ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.28 07:49:00
|
369. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sentient Blade wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Except for the part where the OP had a cloaking device and clearly failed to use it. Or the part where, had they had an escort and thereby by definition had a scout, they wouldn't have jumped i...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.28 05:31:00
|
370. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Angeal MacNova wrote: Skiffs have gone up and are at the highest price they've ever been. Uh-huh. And the numerous changes to the Skiff itself, to the underlying Procurer, and to industry as a whole definitely has nothing to d...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.28 02:49:00
|
371. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Angeal MacNova wrote: Competitive market = good. Monopoly = bad. Why is a monopoly bad for the game if it arises from player actions? Anything done by players can be undone by other players. Anyway, there are vanishingly few monopolizeab...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.28 02:48:00
|
372. Burner Mission Rewards are Horrible! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Not that we're going to get a response, but which decent income sources for solo players in high sec have been killed off in the past? If I remember the list of Dindin's complaintsGǪ GÇó Incursions GÇó Indu...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.28 01:50:00
|
373. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vincent Athena wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: Why should CCP provide protection for your haulage in high sec? CONCORD offer a level of deterrent just the same as any law enforcement agency, but as with any police for they're reactive and punitive...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.28 01:46:00
|
374. Burner Mission Rewards are Horrible! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: And next week, CCP will do an ad blitz for people to get alt accounts to run these missions. Can't wait until they convert all L4's into randomized frigate, cruiser, or BS burner missions, effectively ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.28 01:42:00
|
375. Burner Mission Rewards are Horrible! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Remiel Pollard wrote: Hawkin Pete wrote: These burner mission are tough as hell and they pay out less then a level 2 mission. WTF? Did a bunch of these today and they all pay like 200k and 800 LP. At least CCP is Keeping EVE's award for ha...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.27 20:46:00
|
376. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: Why should CCP provide protection for your haulage in high sec? CONCORD offer a level of deterrent just the same as any law enforcement agency, but as with any police for they're reactive and pun...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.27 20:26:00
|
377. Gambling is apparently illegal in Iceland - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ryder 'ook wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Jonah Gravenstein wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: The only thing we gamble with in Iceland is our lives... by living on a big volcanic rock in the middle of the ocean, thousands of miles from help. You...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.27 19:58:00
|
378. Why do people announce things in alliance chat? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
metalravenous wrote: J3ssica Alba wrote: because being helpful in ally > paranoid fear of spais So being helpful justifies being dumb? It's hard to get ganked when you jump from under cover of undocking invulnerability.
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.27 19:24:00
|
379. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Falcon wrote: Why should CCP provide protection for your haulage in high sec? CONCORD offer a level of deterrent just the same as any law enforcement agency, but as with any police for they're reactive and punitive rather than proactive. ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.27 19:22:00
|
380. Gambling is apparently illegal in Iceland - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: The only thing we gamble with in Iceland is our lives... by living on a big volcanic rock in the middle of the ocean, thousands of miles from help. You forgot about gambling that the rotten sh...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.08.27 19:16:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |