| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
801. Anti-Ganker Barge Fits. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Sosueme Hapytuedispt wrote: You've lost the argument. You either explain, in great detail how you can gank a dreadnaught in 2 seconds flat, or you have no argument and your opinion is invalidated. You made the claim it could be done. The burd...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.17 17:27:00
|
802. Anti-Ganker Barge Fits. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Sosueme Hapytuedispt wrote: Ganking the Veldnaught is impossible. What your getting confused with ungankable is indestructable. So what's your definition of "ungankable?" Quote: Besides the numbers you presented, which you left out a key...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.17 05:37:00
|
803. Sticky:Terms of Service CSM Feedback Thread - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Benny Ohu wrote: other forums have rich text editors so it's easy to understand what you're writing Other forums didn't get coded in a Quafe induced haze one Valentine's weekend.
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 23:51:00
|
804. Anti-Ganker Barge Fits. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Sosueme Hapytuedispt wrote: Yeah, that can't be done. It won't be done. And therefore, it is not gankable. Now you're changing your argument. Nobody claimed that it was likely that someone would organize a gank of the Veldnaught (even tho...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 23:06:00
|
805. Sticky:Terms of Service CSM Feedback Thread - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
^^^ These forums and quotes. Parse them carefully if you're going to edit inside the tags.
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 23:01:00
|
806. Sticky:Terms of Service CSM Feedback Thread - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
xBumper Baby wrote: RubyPorto wrote: The point of my post is that "...used to scam..." cannot be anywhere near the rule. I totally agree. RubyPorto wrote: I was using the "A" "4" equivalence because it was easy to work in as an exampl...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 22:45:00
|
807. i need a loan - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Lord LazyGhost wrote: Logical Chaos wrote: flakeys wrote: the Independent Gaming Group LOL, thanks for pointing that out :D lol that is funny :) sould read the Not so independent gaming group Would you say "needy", "clingy"...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 22:11:00
|
808. Sticky:Terms of Service CSM Feedback Thread - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
xBumper Baby wrote: RubyPorto wrote: MiningAlt, Mining4lt Bah! I wrote an incredibly eloquent and harrumphingly impassioned response to this, but the 'preview' button wiped it! Here's a crappy rewrite: 'I' looks like 'l' because of the ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 22:01:00
|
809. Sticky:Terms of Service CSM Feedback Thread - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Georgina Parmala wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Either character name-based impersonations (Chirbba, Chribbo, Zeppo, Groucho, etc) should be against the rules, full stop, or they should be allowed, full stop. Trying to draw a line through the midd...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 19:45:00
|
810. Sticky:Terms of Service CSM Feedback Thread - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Georgina Parmala wrote: Luckily, this is all fairly irrelevant to the matter at hand. Impersonation does not need to concern itself with randomfool654 who unwittingly gave away his super. The victim is the character being impersonated via sla...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 18:47:00
|
811. Anti-Ganker Barge Fits. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Sosueme Hapytuedispt wrote: You cannot gank the veldnaught, and until you prove otherwise, you are simply ignorant. Assuming that it's pimped out (X type hardeners, A type ENAMs, Slaves, Legion boosts, etc), the Veldnaught has a maximum of 1...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 18:36:00
|
812. Sticky:Terms of Service CSM Feedback Thread - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Georgina Parmala wrote: That makes me think any character name impersonations with malicious intent should be a no-no (as opposed to creating corps/alliances following the previous paragraph, since those can be freely created and closed with ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 18:19:00
|
813. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote: ISD Cura Ursus wrote: Please discuss the TOS changes here. Wait...we're discussing the changes....but we're told there are no changes?!!?! Are there changes or aren't there? There is no change. We h...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 18:15:00
|
814. Writing Checks they cant cash..... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
virm pasuul wrote: OK so I think I get your point now. My original idea is very simply adapted by making the fine a percentage of the REMAINING escrow, or capping it at the remaining escrow amount. Agreed nothing should be allowed to go negativ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 15:29:00
|
815. T2 cruiser/ T2 ship general profitability - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: If you are only making 1 unit runs, yes perfect ME is very low. If you are making 1000 units at a time the extra ME does have an impact, although it is small. Nope. EVE does all the materials math on a per-run basis. T...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 14:13:00
|
816. Writing Checks they cant cash..... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Elvis Preslie wrote: how about I write you a check and then take the money out of the account. it then would be karma for people to say the same thing to you, after you start "driveling" as you call it. If only margin trading gave the buyer ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 13:01:00
|
817. In about two and a half hours.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Chribba wrote: I hear the people in France are already gone? Would you say they've... retreated?
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 12:21:00
|
818. The awox button for corps - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hesod Adee wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Saeger1737 wrote: Its a friendly fire thing, disabling the firing abilities to shoot and kill corpmates not control over a ship You already can: Kill them, pod them and kick them from corp Dock up and...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 09:50:00
|
819. The awox button for corps - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Saeger1737 wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Saeger1737 wrote: Its a friendly fire thing, disabling the firing abilities to shoot and kill corpmates not control over a ship You already can: Kill them, pod them and kick them from corp Dock up and...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 08:33:00
|
820. OTEC again - this time Dysprosium and other r64's - in Market Discussions [original thread]
mynnna wrote: OliverJames wrote: Time to stock up? please discuss "Look, another moon post by someone who has no idea how the system worked or why OTEC worked in the first place!" Am I discussing this right? Was it magic? Did mag...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.16 07:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |