| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
161. Why are titans considered to be "useless" for fleet fights? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Borasao You can get enough Titans together now to multi-DDD cap fleets to death. keep dreaming
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.05.06 13:32:00
|
162. delete - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: TheEndofTheWorld on 02/05/2008 09:54:02 Edited by: TheEndofTheWorld on 02/05/2008 09:53:54 please, delete
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.05.02 09:54:00
|
163. The problem with EVE today can be summed to 2 modules (Web and MWD) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: XFreedomX Here is the core issue. These modules are BROKEN, they DO NOT reflect how physics works. lol
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.04.30 10:14:00
|
164. EVE: The Nano Age - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong They don't orbit, they will hang around and they do not engage against 1:3 odds, they pick off straglers to attempt to get them to engage. E.G. Nano-gang encounters BS gang. Nano-gang burns out of range to eith...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.04.30 09:49:00
|
165. EVE: The Nano Age - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: *****zilla Things aren't static. If the BS are defensive the nanos will zip around, gank anyone outside of bs range, and leave at will. The bs gang wasn't effective. If offensive the nanos will try to dictor the bs, or ...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.04.29 18:26:00
|
166. EVE: The Nano Age - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: *****zilla *cry* long response...wiped by silly forum software...*cry* 5 nanoships has zero chance against a 5 shortrange BS gang. Any decent nanogang FC will RUN when they are outnumbered 2 to 3 times against a decent ...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.04.29 16:31:00
|
167. Directional Scanner Improvements as a Local Replacement - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Complete removal of local 3 AU autoscanner, shows everything(even cloaked) on scanner. Alliances can move their poses to planets, that do not have belts or ban leaving empty ships in forcefield. This would work against the "too easy" passive d...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.04.24 21:20:00
|
168. Vote to sticky duplicates of the latest devblog in all places :) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: TheEndofTheWorld on 19/04/2008 17:24:55 Claiming that there will always be RMT is... ignorant. There will always be bugs in EVE as well, so should CCP should stop fixing them, because there always will be some? I might be wrong, bu...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.04.19 17:24:00
|
169. The best carrier - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Sokratesz Edited by: Sokratesz on 19/04/2008 14:52:08 Originally by: Anubis Xian Archon and Nidhoggur are both good in their own way. Thanatos and Chimera are less so despite the hype. I disagree. Chimera, w...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.04.19 16:24:00
|
170. 3.6 Million Dollar per year isk seller fingered... its CCP! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Malcanis I'm still waiting for someone to suggest a policy that would do less harm and more good than allowing GTC sales. It's pointless whining about GTC for ISK unless you can suggest an alternative. Regulating the syste...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.04.09 19:12:00
|
171. 3.6 Million Dollar per year isk seller fingered... its CCP! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Having legal RMT also has a downside. If the only way to obtain ISK would be illegal RMT, a lot of the older players would actually have to think about buying isk. Illegal RMT would only be a tool for players who really aren't committed to EVE in ...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.04.09 19:08:00
|
172. 3.6 Million Dollar per year isk seller fingered... its CCP! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tarminic Originally by: TheEndofTheWorld The whole topic is about CCP being hypocrites. I accept that it might be appealing to some customers, or that it has some advantages. But, in the end it is still RMT. GT...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.04.09 18:09:00
|
173. 3.6 Million Dollar per year isk seller fingered... its CCP! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The whole topic is about CCP being hypocrites. I accept that it might be appealing to some customers, or that it has some advantages. But, in the end it is still RMT. GTC trading is just a fancy name for RMT Don't try to deny that, it is ...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.04.09 18:07:00
|
174. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong Originally by: TheEndofTheWorld Originally by: Goumindong ... Your list is biased. You left plenty of things out... Ask any nanopilot, would they like to have a nanophoon pre-nerf or a vagabon...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.04.01 15:02:00
|
175. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong ... Your list is biased. You left plenty of things out... Ask any nanopilot, would they like to have a nanophoon pre-nerf or a vagabond(or other nanohacs/recons) today...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.04.01 14:16:00
|
176. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: TheEndofTheWorld on 30/03/2008 15:29:40 Edited by: TheEndofTheWorld on 30/03/2008 15:28:26 Quote: The question isn't "can one", the question is "can two"? "blobbing" in that you have more ships than your enemy, is a leg...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.03.30 15:28:00
|
177. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: TheEndofTheWorld on 30/03/2008 14:29:55 Originally by: Goumindong ... Originally by: Goumindong ... Can a nanozealot kill a tanked zealot? NO Can a nanoishtar even kill a t1 cruiser? NO Pretty much all clos...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.03.30 14:25:00
|
178. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: TheEndofTheWorld on 29/03/2008 15:52:46 Originally by: IamAcontractALT Edited by: IamAcontractALT on 29/03/2008 15:30:09 Originally by: L70Rogue Look at this battle report, only a few nano ships takes out an enti...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.03.29 15:52:00
|
179. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lord WarATron Originally by: TheEndofTheWorld Originally by: Lord WarATron non-nanoships being almost useless vs a nanogang Where do you get this from? From being a nano-pilot myself. Be more spec...
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.03.29 15:31:00
|
180. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lord WarATron non-nanoships being almost useless vs a nanogang Where do you get this from?
- by TheEndofTheWorld - at 2008.03.29 15:13:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |