| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dustpuppy is right. Nobody cares anymore, especially CCP. Old news. Move on...
- by Trakow - at 2015.05.03 06:20:08
|
2. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Trakow wrote: Crying about his threads existence You can keep posting the exact same posts if you want, but this is the thread CCP made for these particular types of discussions and questions. I understand that you think i...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.29 14:21:59
|
3. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
AayJay Crendraven wrote: Trakow wrote: That's what I expect them to say, and it's very clear. You clearly missed the first post that said to ask any questions about ISBoxer or any activity that remotely relates to ISBoxer in a ticket. W...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.29 03:07:32
|
4. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
AayJay Crendraven wrote: Trakow wrote: Wrong. As for your mention of TS3, see the Third Party Policy under Client Modification, which states: "the use of programs that provide in-game overlays (Mumble, Teamspeak) is not something we plan ...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.29 03:04:12
|
5. Kerbal Space Program 1.0 has finally been released! - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Jade Blackwind wrote: Warning: heatshields have no mass, so pods tend to flip upside down and burn on re-entry. Wait until hotfix with any landings that you can't reverse. Another recommended fix is early (25 km+) parachute deployment. Apparent...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.29 02:55:53
|
6. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
AayJay Crendraven wrote: Trakow, let's try something new. You submit a ticket and ask, in your own words, about the legality of ISBoxer's VideoFX software, or the legality of using Windows Aero. If CCP says anything other than "You should re...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.29 02:44:32
|
7. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
AayJay Crendraven wrote: Incorrect as the only way to ban VideoFX's interaction with a client would also snag video capturing software such as Fraps (though as I mentioned earlier I'd be unsure as to Shadowplay due to the nature of how it grab...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.29 02:41:54
|
8. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Posting observations regarding the subject of this thread: 1-CCP made their statement on this subject clear on post #1. 2-CCP clearly has no intention on answering specific questions from players in this thread and keep referring to the first po...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.29 02:30:11
|
9. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Trakow wrote: I'm requesting/suggesting that CCP/ISD lock this thread for the following reasons: 1-CCP made their statement on this subject clear on post #1. 2-CCP clearly has no intention on answering specific questions from players in this ...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.28 14:07:58
|
10. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
AayJay Crendraven wrote: 4 windows tiled, or 4 separate monitors. Have Windows function "OnMouseOverFocus" set on. Spin mouse in circle at the corner of the 4 monitors, and mash F1. Tada, you just send 4x commands on 4x separate clients to the...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.27 14:17:41
|
11. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GankYou wrote: Bachari Tanner wrote: Trakow wrote: Forum Moderation Policy #27 : Off-topic posting is prohibited. Thos posts were on topic. Why is it you are posting here if you think that everything has been said and the thread is ...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.27 14:11:45
|
12. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bachari Tanner wrote: Trakow wrote: THIRD-PARTY POLICIES : A) "We will not authorize or otherwise sanction the use of any third party software." B) "We may, in our discretion, tolerate the use of applications or other software that simp...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.27 14:04:40
|
13. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GankYou wrote: And since CCP already got their cash, does it matter to them when that ISBoxer converts 80 PLEX into game time? Hell, no! All it means is that there are more PLEX on the market thus driving down the isk cost. CCP cares when so...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.27 03:01:14
|
14. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lee Sin Priest wrote: Trakow wrote: I'm requesting/suggesting that CCP/ISD lock this thread for the following reasons: 1-CCP made their statement on this subject clear on post #1. Really, really was not clear seeing as how they went fro...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.27 02:54:28
|
15. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm requesting/suggesting that CCP/ISD lock this thread for the following reasons: 1-CCP made their statement on this subject clear on post #1. 2-CCP clearly has no intention on answering specific questions from players in this thread and keep r...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.26 20:03:26
|
16. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote: Removed a ton of off topic/personal attack/ranting posts. Please don't get to the point where we have to do more about it. Thank you. Well, all my posts which were removed were a result of defending CCP's abilit...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.26 05:00:06
|
17. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
AayJay Crendraven wrote: And again, writing a complex macro to automate gameplay is measurably in violation of the EULA. One of the CCP devs used to define banned complex macros by saying "If your macro has any sort of "if then" statement, it'...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.25 03:55:25
|
18. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Yes it is, it really is that simple. I'm claiming people will get banned in error and am of the opinion that a single person banned in error for something like RR is too many. You are claiming I'm wrong and that nobody will be...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.23 22:23:02
|
19. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Trakow wrote: Again, saying that people WILL be banned People WILL be banned (in error). If you are suggesting they won't that means you think CCP are infallible and will achieve a 0% false positive rate. Simple question, ...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.23 21:16:19
|
20. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: So you're a DBA, good job. I too have experience, I've been a professional developer for over 10 years and a hobbyist developer a heck of a lot longer than that. I've worked with a number of languages including having been emp...
- by Trakow - at 2015.04.23 19:54:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |